<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- name="generator" content="blosxom/2.0" -->
<!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN" "http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd">

<rss version="0.91">
  <channel>
    <title>Notebooks   </title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks</link>
    <description>Cosma's Notebooks</description>
    <language>en</language>

  <item>
    <title>Asceticism and Self-Mortification</title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks/2004/03/02#asceticism</link>
    <description>


&lt;P&gt;Especially intellectual self-mortification.  Even more especially, what
causes intellectuals to despise and repudiate intellect, and even to devise
elaborate theories concerning the despicability of intellect?

&lt;P&gt;&lt;em&gt;Costly signalling and sunk costs.&lt;/em&gt;  Costly signalling is the idea
that &quot;talk is cheap&quot; --- it's too easy to &lt;em&gt;say&lt;/em&gt; you'll do something for
that to mean very much, but if you're willing to do something difficult and
costly and hard to fake, &lt;em&gt;that&lt;/em&gt; should carry conviction.  Asceticism
could be thought of as a costly signal of the ascetic's devotion to their
cause.  A religion (or other group) that demands asceticism of its members
thus has an easy way of checking who is really committed.  However,
this does not &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; explain why ascetic practices are attractive.
There I think we're looking at a combination of pride (&quot;am I strong enough
to bear this?&quot;) and a form of effort justification or dissonance reduction ---
an unwillingness to admit that the (considerable) costs incurred by the ascetic
were wasted.  That is, the &lt;em&gt;binding&lt;/em&gt; power of ascetic practices derives
from our susceptibility to the sunk cost fallacy.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;See also:
	&lt;a href=&quot;initiation-rites.html&quot;&gt;Initiation Rites&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;mysticism.html&quot;&gt;Mysticism&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;shamanism.html&quot;&gt;Shamanism&lt;/a&gt;

	&lt;ul&gt;To read:
	&lt;li&gt;Ariel Glucklich, &lt;cite&gt;Sacred Pain: Hurting the Body for the Sake
of the Soul&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Geoffrey Galt Harpham, &lt;cite&gt;The Ascetic Imperative in Culture and
Criticism&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Susan Ashbrook Harvey, &lt;cite&gt;Asceticism and Society in Crisis: John
of Ephesus and &lt;/cite&gt;The Lives of the Eastern Saints [&lt;a
href=&quot;http://ark.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/ft3d5nb1n1/&quot;&gt;online&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;George Levine, &lt;cite&gt;Dying to Know: Scientific Epistemology and
Narrative in Victorian England&lt;/cite&gt; [Review by Lorraine Daston: &lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.lrb.co.uk/v24/n21/dast01_.html&quot;&gt;Saintly
Resonances&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Vincent L. Wimbush (ed.)
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Ascetic Behavior in Greco-Roman
Antiquity: A Sourcebook&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Asceticism&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>