<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- name="generator" content="blosxom/2.0" -->
<!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN" "http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd">

<rss version="0.91">
  <channel>
    <title>Notebooks   </title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks</link>
    <description>Cosma's Notebooks</description>
    <language>en</language>

  <item>
    <title>W. Ross Ashby</title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks/1999/11/29#ashby</link>
    <description>




&lt;P&gt;British psychiatrist, one of the brighter lights of the early days of &lt;a
href=&quot;cybernetics.html&quot;&gt;cybernetics&lt;/a&gt;, who is extremely little known for all
the quality of his work and all the eminent people he influenced --- &lt;a
href=&quot;simon.html&quot;&gt;Herbert Simon&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;wiener.html&quot;&gt;Norbert Wiener&lt;/a&gt;,
Miller, Galanter &amp;amp; Pribram, Stuart Kauffman (see below), and so on.  In
fact, I can't find any references to him in any of the standard biographical
reference works on science, math, technology, computers, etc. (to say nothing
of &lt;cite&gt;Britannica,&lt;/cite&gt; which continues its steady decline from the heights
of the 11th edition), and only passing mention of him in histories like Heims's
&lt;cite&gt;The Cybernetics Group.&lt;/cite&gt; This is bizarre and unjust, and I'd greatly
appreciate it if anyone who could tell me anything about him would write me.


&lt;P&gt;And &lt;a href=&quot;adaptation.html&quot;&gt;adaptation&lt;/a&gt;.  And intelligence, esp.  &lt;a
href=&quot;ia.html&quot;&gt;intelligence augmentation&lt;/a&gt;.  The &quot;law of requisite
variety.&quot;  The idea that any deterministic system will eventually evolve its
&quot;own sort of life and intelligence, possibly in the zero degree.&quot;  Where did
his (unfortunate) infatuation with Bourbaki come from?

&lt;ul&gt;Recommended:
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;&lt;a name=&quot;design-for-a-brain&quot;&gt;Design for a Brain: The Origin of
Adaptive Behavior.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/cite&gt; [I really like this book.  It is, I think, wrong
in places (see below), but it's clear, persuasive, even elegant in a way, and
turns up in the oddest places.  It is, for instance, one of the inspirations of
&lt;a href=&quot;complexity.html&quot;&gt;Stuart Kauffman's &lt;cite&gt;The Origins of
Order&lt;/cite&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (though &lt;cite&gt;Design&lt;/cite&gt; is much more fun to read).  In one
sense it's very advanced, since Ashby began incubating the ideas in the '40s,
published the first version as a paper in '48, and the second edition of the
book in '60: yet it's still very informative.  On the other hand, his
references to dynamical systems are thirty or forty years out of date, and at
times I have to stop and consciously translate what he's saying into the modern
language.
	&lt;P&gt;It's actually still in print (Chapman and Hall, London, ISBN
0-412-20090-2), but my copy from the publishers took months to reach me; and
$30 is a bit much for a ~300 page paperback.  I may perhaps quote the
&quot;Summary&quot; on p. 238:
	&lt;blockquote&gt;The primary fact is that &lt;em&gt;all&lt;/em&gt; isolated
state-determined dynamic systems are selective: from whatever state they have
initially, they go towards states of equilibrium.  These states of equilibrium
are always characterised, in their relation to the change-inducing laws of the
system, by being &lt;em&gt;exceptionally resistant.&lt;/em&gt;
	&lt;P&gt;(Specially resistant are those forms whose occurrence leads, by
whatever method, to the occurrence of further replicates of the same form ---
the so-called `reproducing' forms.)
	&lt;P&gt;If the systems permits the formation of local equilibria, these will
take the form of dynamic subsystems, exceptionally resistant to the disruptive
effects of events ocuring locally.
	&lt;P&gt;When such a stable dynamic subsystem is examined internally, it will be
found to have parts that are &lt;em&gt;co-ordinated&lt;/em&gt; in their defence against
disturbance.
	&lt;P&gt;If the class of disturbance changes from generation to generation but
is constant within each generation, even more resistant are those forms that
are born with a mechanism such that the &lt;em&gt;environment&lt;/em&gt; will make it act
in a regulatory way against the particular evnironment --- the &quot;learning&quot;
organisms.
	&lt;P&gt;This book has been largely concerned with the last stage of the
process.  It has shown, by consideration of specially clear and simple cases,
how the gene-pattern can provide a mechanism (with both basic and ancillary
parts) that, when acted on by any given environment, will inevitably tend to
adapt to that particular environment.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
	Clearly, there are some parts of this which are over-statements (for
instance, chaotic Hamiltonian systems can wander over essentially all of their
phase space indifferently, i.e. they do not go to equilibria).  I think it's
equally clear that Ashby really was on to something, and one of my longer-term
projects is to re-do the essential portions of &lt;cite&gt;Design for a Brain&lt;/cite&gt;
in modern terms (replacing &quot;equilibrium&quot; with &quot;attractor&quot;, for instance),
showing where Ashby's results break down and how they must be modified.
Ideally, I'd preface this by a sketch of his life and of his influence.]
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Introduction to Cybernetics&lt;/cite&gt; [Now &lt;a
href=&quot;http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/ASHBBOOK.html&quot;&gt;available on-line in PDF&lt;/a&gt;!]
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;a name=&quot;princip-self-org&quot;&gt;&quot;Principles of Self-Organizing
Systems&quot;&lt;/a&gt; in Heinz von Foerster and George W. Zopf, Jr., eds.,
&lt;cite&gt;Principles of Self-Organization,&lt;/cite&gt; 1962.  [Remarkably enough, for
such a paper, it claims that there's really no such thing as self-organization.
The argument runs as follows.  By the &quot;organization&quot; of a system, Ashby means
the rule which takes present states into future states.  A self-organizing
system, at the very minimum, must change its organization.  One could try to
represent this by making the evolution-rule depend on the current state, but
obviously this just means you have a different, unchanging rule than you first
thought.  You could make the rule depend on some external input: then the
organization would change with the input; but then it isn't really
&lt;em&gt;self&lt;/em&gt;-organizing; and if you include the input-device in the system,
you're back where you started.
	&lt;P&gt;I don't think this is what most people have in mind when the speak
about &quot;self-organization&quot;; rather I think it's more like what Ashby considers
under the heading of &quot;selection of states&quot; by the organization of the system.
To make some slight move towards formalizing it, a system would be
self-organizing if it takes a flat, even distribution of states into a peaked,
non-uniform one.  If p is the distribution over states, then I think it would
be enough to say that (sum) p log p was decreasing.
	&lt;P&gt;Cf. &lt;a href=&quot;self-organization.html&quot;&gt;self-organization&lt;/a&gt; in these
notebooks, and my talk &lt;a href=&quot;../Self-organization/soup-done/&quot;&gt;&quot;Is the
Primordial Soup Done Yet?&quot;&lt;/A&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;&quot;Principles of the Self-Organizing Dynamic System,&quot; &lt;cite&gt;Journal
of General Psychology&lt;/cite&gt; (1947) &lt;strong&gt;37&lt;/strong&gt;: 125--128 [First
known occurance of &quot;self-organizing&quot; in print.  Uses the same notion of
organization as the above, and shows how it can &lt;em&gt;apparently&lt;/em&gt; change if
some of the variables are step-functions of the others.]
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rossashby.info/index.html&quot;&gt;The W. Ross Ashby
Digital Archive&lt;/a&gt; [Complete archive of his research journal, plus
bibliography, biographical information, etc.]
	&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;To read (thanks to Maurice Lanselle for some pointers):
	&lt;li&gt;WRA, &lt;cite&gt;Mechanisms of Intelligence&lt;/cite&gt; [Posthumous collection
of &quot;writings on cybernetics&quot; --- I suspect I've read them all, but...]
	&lt;li&gt;Roberto Cordeschi, &lt;cite&gt;The Discovery of the Artificial: Behavior,
Mind and Machines Before and Beyond Cybernetics&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;George J. Klir, &quot;W. Ross Ashby&quot; [Originally Klir's
introduction to &lt;cite&gt;Mechanisms of Intelligence&lt;/citE&gt;, now
&lt;a href=&quot;http://projects.isss.org/Main/WRossAshbyByGeorgeJKlir&quot;&gt;online&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Andrew Pickering, &quot;Cybernetics and the Mangle: Ashby, Beer and
Pask&quot;
[&lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.soc.uiuc.edu/people/CVPubs/pickerin/cybernetics.pdf&quot;&gt;PDF&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>