<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- name="generator" content="blosxom/2.0" -->
<!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN" "http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd">

<rss version="0.91">
  <channel>
    <title>Notebooks   </title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks</link>
    <description>Cosma's Notebooks</description>
    <language>en</language>

  <item>
    <title>Branching Processes</title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks/2012/01/08#branching-processes</link>
    <description>
&lt;P&gt;A class of &lt;a href=&quot;stochastic-processes.html&quot;&gt;stochastic process&lt;/a&gt;
important as models in genetics and population biology, chemical kinetics, and
filtering.  The basic idea is that there are a number of objects, often called
particles, which, in some random fashion, reproduce (&quot;branch&quot;) and die out;
they can be of multiple types and occupy
differing &lt;a href=&quot;spatial-statistics.html&quot;&gt;spatial locations&lt;/a&gt;.  They can
pursue their trajectories and their biographies either independently, or with
some kind of statistical dependence across particles.

&lt;P&gt;The most basic version has one type of particle, and no spatial
considerations.  At each time step, each parrticle gives rise to a random
number of offspring; the distribution of offspring is fixed, and the number is
independent across time-steps and across lineages (IID).  This is the so-called
Galton-Watson branching process.  Galton introduced it as a model of the
survival of (patrilneal) family names, so that only male offspring counted; he
required the distribution of time until a given lineage went extinct.  This was
provided almost immediately by Watson, in a very elegant use of the method of
generating functions, which is, itself, reproduced in probability textbooks
down to the present day.  (However, when I first encoutnered the problem, in a
probability class, the teacher presented it as one about the survival
of &lt;em&gt;matrilineal&lt;/em&gt; lineages, defined by inheritance of mitochondrial DNA.
Whether this was conscious subversion of the patriarchy, or just a reflection
of the changing scientific interests between the 1890s and the 1990s, I
couldn't say.)

&lt;P&gt;See also:
	&lt;a href=&quot;epidemiology.html&quot;&gt;Epidemiology&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;social-contagion.html&quot;&gt;Social Contagion&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;Recommended (introductory):
	&lt;li&gt;Geoffrey Grimmett and David Stirzaker, &lt;cite&gt;Probability and Random
Processes&lt;/cite&gt; [This is my favorite probability textbook, and returns to
branching processes in many places.]
	&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;Recommended (forbiddingly technical):
	&lt;li&gt;P. Del Moral and L. Miclo, &quot;Branching and Interacting Particle
Systems Approximations of Feynman-Kac Formulae with Applications to Nonlinear
Filtering&quot;, in J. Azema, M. Emery, M. Ledoux and M. Yor
(eds)., &lt;cite&gt;Semainaire de Probabilites XXXIV&lt;/cite&gt; (Springer-Verlag, 2000),
pp. 1--145 [&lt;a href=&quot;http://math1.unice.fr/~delmoral/seminaire.ps&quot;&gt;Postscript
preprint&lt;/a&gt;.  Looks like a trial run for Del Moral's book, below, which I've
yet to read.]
	&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;P&gt;To read:
	&lt;li&gt;David Assaf, Larry Goldstein and Ester Samuel-Cahn, &quot;An unexpected
connection between branching processes and optimal
stopping&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.PR/0510587&quot;&gt;math.PR/0510587&lt;/a&gt;
= &lt;cite&gt;Journal of Applied Probability&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;37&lt;/strong&gt; (2000):
613--6 [This sounds like a nice pedagogical topic for a course in stochastic
processes.  I teach a course in stochastic processes....]
	&lt;li&gt;Michael Assaf and Baruch Meerson, &quot;Spectral Theory of Metastability
and Extinction in Birth-Death
Systems&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.200602&quot;&gt;Physical
Review Letters&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;97&lt;/strong&gt; (2006): 200602&lt;/a&gt;
= &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0610415&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0610415&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Krishna B. Athreya, &lt;cite&gt;Branching Processes&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;K. B. Athreya, A.P. Ghosh, S. Sethuraman, &quot;Growth of preferential
attachment random graphs via continuous-time branching
processes&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.PR/0701649&quot;&gt;math.PR/0701649&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Ellen Baake, Hans-Otto Georgii, &quot;Mutation, selection, and ancestry
in branching models: a variational
approach&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/q-bio.PE/0611018&quot;&gt;q-bio.PE/0611018&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Romulus Breban, Raffaele Vardavas and Sally Blower,
&quot;Linking population-level models with growing networks: A class of epidemic models&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.72.046110&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Physical Review E&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;72&lt;/strong&gt; (2005): 046110&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Nicolas Champagnat, R&amp;eacute;gis Ferri&amp;egrave;re, Sylvie
M&amp;eacute;l&amp;eacute;ar, &quot;Individual-based probabilistic models of adaptive
evolution and various scaling
approximations&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.PR/0510453&quot;&gt;math.PR/0510453&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Charles R. Doering, Khachik V. Sargsyan and Leonard M. Sander,
&quot;Extinction times for birth-death processes: exact results, continuum
asymptotics, and the failure of the Fokker-Planck approximation&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/q-bio/0401016&quot;&gt;q-bio/0401016&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Pierre Del Moral, &lt;cite&gt;Feynman-Kac Formulae: Genealogical and
Interacting Particle Systems&lt;/cite&gt; [This looks &lt;em&gt;really, really cool&lt;/em&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Janos Englander, &quot;Branching diffusions, superdiffusions and random media&quot;, &lt;cite&gt;Probability Surveys&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;4&lt;/strong&gt; (2007): 303--364,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/0710.0236&quot;&gt;arxiv:0710.0236&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Benjamin Golub and Matthew O. Jackson, &quot;Using selection bias to explain the observed structure of Internet diffusions&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1000814107&quot;&gt;&lt;citE&gt;Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences&lt;/cite&gt; (USA) &lt;strong&gt;107&lt;/strong&gt; (2010): 10833--10836&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Vicenc Gomez, Hilbert J. Kappen and Andreas Kaltenbrunner,
&quot;Modeling the structure and evolution of discussion cascades&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/1011.0673&quot;&gt;arxiv:1011.0673&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;P. Haccou et al., &lt;cite&gt;Branching Processes: Variation, Growth,
and Extinction of Populations&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Jose Luis Iribarren and Esteban Moro, &quot;Branching Dynamics of Viral
Information Spreading&quot;, &lt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.84.046116&quot;&gt;cite&gt;Physical Review E&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;84&lt;/strong&gt; (2011): 046116&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Predrag R. Jelenkovic, Jian Tan, &quot;Modulated Branching Processes,
Origins of Power Laws and Queueing
Duality&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/0709.4297&quot;&gt;0709.4297&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Junghyo Jo, Jean-Yves Fortin, M. Y. Choi, &quot;Weibull-type limiting distribution for replicative systems&quot;, &lt;cite&gt;Physical Review E&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;83&lt;/strong&gt; (2011): 031123, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/1103.3038&quot;&gt;arxiv:1103.3038&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Jean-Francois Le Gall, &lt;cite&gt;Spatial Branching Processes,
Random Snakes and Partial Differential Equations&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Brendan P. M. McCabe1, Gael M. Martin2, David Harris3, &quot;Efficient probabilistic forecasts for counts&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2010.00762.x&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Journal
of the Royal Statistical Society&lt;/cite&gt; B &lt;strong&gt;73&lt;/strong&gt; (2011): 253--272&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Sebastian M&amp;uuml;ller, &quot;Strong recurrence for branching Markov
chains&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/0710.4651&quot;&gt;arxiv:0710.4651&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Victor M. Panaretos, &quot;Partially observed branching processes for
stochastic
epidemics&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00285-006-0062-6&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Journal
of Mathematical Biology&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;54&lt;/strong&gt; (2007): 645--668&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;David Sankoff, &quot;Branching Processes with Terminal Types:
Application to Context-Free Grammars&quot;, &lt;cite&gt;Journal of Applied
Probability&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;8&lt;/strong&gt; (1971): 233--240
[&lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.jstor.org/pss/3211893&quot;&gt;JSTOR&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;D. Sornette and S. Utkin, &quot;Limits of declustering methods for disentangling exogenous from endogenous events in time series with foreshocks, main shocks, and aftershocks&quot;, &lt;cite&gt;Physical Review E&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;79&lt;/strong&gt; (2009): 061110, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/0903.3217&quot;&gt;arxiv:0903.3217&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
