<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- name="generator" content="blosxom/2.0" -->
<!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN" "http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd">

<rss version="0.91">
  <channel>
    <title>Notebooks   </title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks</link>
    <description>Cosma's Notebooks</description>
    <language>en</language>

  <item>
    <title>Ernst Cassirer, 1874--1945</title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks/2000/06/01#cassirer</link>
    <description>
&lt;P&gt;German philosopher and intellectual historian; escaped from the Nazis, first to
Oxford, then to Goteborg and finally to Yale.  I've only just started to read
him, beginning with what was first to hand, namely the historical works, and
frankly I'm puzzled.

&lt;P&gt;What, exactly, is a &quot;symbolic form&quot;?  It seems to have some connection to
Kant's ideas about the structures which we necessarily impose upon phenomena;
but on the other hand Cassirer sometimes talks about them as though they
evolved through time.  Also, he speaks of &quot;science&quot; and &quot;myth&quot; as symbolic
forms, though I don't think he would have said we have &quot;scientific&quot; or
&quot;mythic&quot; perceptions.  And did Cassirer believe in noumena?  And, on the
subject of &lt;a href=&quot;myths.html&quot;&gt;myths&lt;/a&gt;, having read his &lt;cite&gt;Myth of the
State,&lt;/cite&gt; which he begins with a summary of his thoughts on what myths are
and what they do, all I can tell you is that he thought they had something to
do with emotions, could be about any subject at all, and had rituals as their
&quot;motor expressions.&quot;  (Perhaps that was a bad exposition on his part; perhaps
I'm just dense.)

&lt;P&gt;And just what principles &lt;em&gt;did&lt;/em&gt; he employ in historical research?  His
&lt;cite&gt;Philosophy of the Englightenment,&lt;/cite&gt; for instance, is rightly a
standard work, as it has been ever since 1932.  (And what went through his
mind, the mind of a man prodigiously learned and cultivated in the German
scholarly tradition, as he wrote a deeply sympathetic book about the eighteenth
century and the &lt;em&gt;philosophes,&lt;/em&gt; about Progress, Enlightenment, the March
of Reason and Experience, the Progress of Toleration and all the rest, while
outside the brown shirts marched in the streets?)  Yet every once in a while
there is what I can only think of as an erruption of oddity, when he devotes
pages and pages to some writer who was obscure in his own day, and now is all
but forgotten, who either thought he was carrying on the tradition of Leibniz,
or who seems to have anticipated Kant and Hegel in some particular.  (This'd
make some sense if he thought those worthies represented the One True Tradition
in philosophy, but he never comes out to say as much.  Perhaps he thought it
went without saying.)  And why give over the last quarter of the book, ninety
pages or so, to aesthetics and art criticism, of all things?  Similar comments
apply, with even more force, to &lt;cite&gt;The Myth of the State&lt;/cite&gt;: here is a
book, ostensibly about
modern &lt;a href=&quot;totalitarianism.html&quot;&gt;totalitarianism&lt;/a&gt;, which spends more
time trying to figure out just what Machiavelli admired about Cesar Borgia than
it does talking about totalitarianism!  (He's illuminating about Machiavelli,
actually, but that's not the point.)  Some of this would make sense if he
thought of history as mostly driven by Ideas, and teleologically at that, but
I'm not at all sure that's the case.

&lt;P&gt;&lt;em&gt;Later (28 Oct. 1999).&lt;/em&gt; I've now read Cassirer's &lt;cite&gt;Essay on
Man,&lt;/cite&gt; which was written as his own introduction to his thought for those
who hadn't German, supposedly even for those who weren't scholars.  Matters are
a bit clearer, but not as much as I'd like.  I've explained why in my review of
the &lt;cite&gt;Essay,&lt;/cite&gt; linked to below, and shan't repeat myself here.

&lt;ul&gt;Recommended:
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;An Essay on Man&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;../reviews/essay-on-man/&quot;&gt;Review&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;The Philosophy of the &lt;a href=&quot;enlightenment.html&quot;&gt;Enlightenment&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Ian Strenski, &lt;cite&gt;Four Theories of Myth in Twentieth-Century
History: Cassirer, Eliade, Levi-Strauss and Malinowski&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;To read:
	&lt;li&gt;EC
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;The Individual and the Cosmos in &lt;a
href=&quot;renaissance.html&quot;&gt;Renaissance&lt;/a&gt; Philosophy&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Kant's Life and Thought&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Language and Myth&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;The Logic of the Cultural Sciences&lt;/cite&gt; [Earlier
translated as &lt;citE&gt;The Logic of the Humanities&lt;/cite&gt;]
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Philosophy of Symbolic Forms&lt;/cite&gt;
			&lt;ol&gt;
			&lt;li&gt;&lt;citE&gt;Language&lt;/cite&gt;
			&lt;li&gt;&lt;citE&gt;Myth&lt;/cite&gt;
			&lt;li&gt;&lt;citE&gt;The Phenomenology of Knowledge&lt;/cite&gt;
			&lt;/ol&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;The Problem of Knowledge&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Substance and Function&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Silvia Ferretti, &lt;cite&gt;Cassirer, Panofsky, and Warburg: Symbol,
Art, and History&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Michael Friedman, &lt;cite&gt;A Parting of the Ways: Carnap, Cassirer and
Heidegger&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Seymour W. Itzkoff,&lt;cite&gt;Ernst Cassirer: Scientific Knowledge and
the Concept of Man&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;John M. Krois, &lt;cite&gt;Cassirer: Symbolic Forms and History&lt;/cite&gt; [Thanks to Greg Pasquarello for the reference]
	&lt;li&gt;Lipton, &lt;cite&gt;Ernst Cassirer: The Dilemmas of a Liberal
Intellectual in Germany, 1914--1933&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Paul A. Schlipp (ed.), &lt;cite&gt;The Philosophy of Ernst
Cassirer&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Edward Skidelsky, &lt;cite&gt;Ernst Cassirer: The Last Philosopher
of Culture&lt;/citE&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://press.princeton.edu/titles/8806.html&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>