<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- name="generator" content="blosxom/2.0" -->
<!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN" "http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd">

<rss version="0.91">
  <channel>
    <title>Notebooks   </title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks</link>
    <description>Cosma's Notebooks</description>
    <language>en</language>

  <item>
    <title>Complex Adaptive Systems</title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks/1995/03/13#complex-adaptive-systems</link>
    <description>

I say we call them adapters, and send ``complex'' home to get some rest, but
no one listens to &lt;em&gt;me.&lt;/em&gt;  See &lt;a href=&quot;adaptation.html&quot;&gt;adaptation&lt;/a&gt; and
&lt;a href=&quot;complexity.html&quot;&gt;complexity.&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It has been represented to me, that ``complex adapative system'' is needed
to describe a large number of interacting adapters.  Now &lt;a href=&quot;voltaire.html&quot;&gt;Voltaire&lt;/a&gt; was once
attacking a hack for writing bad books, when he was told that the poor man
had to eat, after all: to which he said, ``I do not see the necessity.''  A
collection or society or community or population of adapters, even (though I
despise the word) a system of adapters, would seem to fit the bill; and there
is precedent for a ``Pandemonium'' of adapters as well
</description>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
