<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- name="generator" content="blosxom/2.0" -->
<!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN" "http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd">

<rss version="0.91">
  <channel>
    <title>Notebooks   </title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks</link>
    <description>Cosma's Notebooks</description>
    <language>en</language>

  <item>
    <title>Evolutionary psychology</title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks/2009/04/10#evol-psych</link>
    <description>


&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;em&gt;Someday we'll live on Venus
	&lt;br&gt;And men will walk on Mars
	&lt;br&gt;But we will still be monkeys
	&lt;br&gt;Down deep inside&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;P&gt;The study of how our minds have evolved, and the traces left by that
evolution.  The most important seems to be that we don't have a general,
content-neutral intelligence, but a gang or collection of specialized
intelligences bent and stretched into unnatural poses for things
like &lt;a href=&quot;math.html&quot;&gt;math&lt;/a&gt;.  Logically, all this is quite separate from
the question of whether or not we use evolutionary processes in our thinking,
whether the mind is a &lt;a href=&quot;darwin-machines.html&quot;&gt;Darwin machine,&lt;/a&gt; but I
think all the advocates of the latter support evolutionary psychology as well.

&lt;P&gt;It should be obvious that, if we have inherited a tendency or bias towards
&lt;em&gt;Q&lt;/em&gt; from our ancestors, this doesn't mean we should &lt;em&gt;Q,&lt;/em&gt; and
everyone accepts this without question when it comes to logic and reasoning.
Certain popularizers (e.g. Gazzaniga, and especially Wright) forget this when
it comes to things like the relations between the sexes: predictable, but
depressing nonetheless.  (Finding an evolutionary explanation for this bias is
left as an exercise for the student.)  Fortunately Blaffer Hrdy is an excellent
corrective to this.

&lt;P&gt;&lt;em&gt;Methodological issues/problems:&lt;/em&gt; Conflating observed range of
variation in human behavior with range of &lt;em&gt;possible&lt;/em&gt; behavior.
Restricted cultural background of most experimental psychology subjects.  Lack
of knowledge of ancestral environments and their range of variability.  Degree
to which contemporary foraging societies can serve as proxies for ancestral
ones is unclear.  (Modern foragers tend to live in environments which agrarian
or industrial societies &lt;em&gt;didn't want&lt;/em&gt;; also, many foragers are more or
less economically, i.e., ecologically, integrated with nearby settled
communities.)  Difficulties of distinguishing between direct adaptations and
by-products of adaptations.  (Real, but often exaggerated, I think.)  &amp;mdash;
All of these seem like reasons for &lt;em&gt;caution&lt;/em&gt;, but not for abandoning
the project, and many of them are of a piece with the difficulties of any
kind of social science.

&lt;P&gt;See also:
	&lt;a href=&quot;adaptation.html&quot;&gt;Adaptation&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;archaeology.html&quot;&gt;Archaeology&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;chomsky.html&quot;&gt;Noam Chomsky&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;cognitive-science.html&quot;&gt;Cognitive Science&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;development-bio.html&quot;&gt;Developmental Biology&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;ethics-biology.html&quot;&gt;Ethics, Game Theory and Biology&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;evolution.html&quot;&gt;Evolution&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;human-evolution.html&quot;&gt;Human Evolution&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;judgment.html&quot;&gt;Judgment and Decision-Making&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;memes.html&quot;&gt;Memes and Related Ideas about the Evolution of
Culture&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;social-science-methodology.html&quot;&gt;Methodology for the Social Sciences&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;neuroscience.html&quot;&gt;Neuroscience&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;social-neuroscience.html&quot;&gt;Social Neuroscience&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;sociology.html&quot;&gt;Sociology&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;universal-images.html&quot;&gt;Universal Images and Cultural
Universals&lt;/a&gt;


&lt;ul&gt;Recommended:
	&lt;li&gt;The &lt;a
href=&quot;http://cogprints.soton.ac.uk/view-evol-psy.html&quot;&gt;Evolutionary
Psychology&lt;/a&gt; section of &lt;a
href=&quot;http://cogprints.soton.ac.uk/view-ROOT.html&quot;&gt;CogPrints&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Jerome Barkow, Leda Cosmides and John Tooby (eds.), &lt;cite&gt;The
Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture&lt;/cite&gt; [An
important early collection of papers.  Like most edited volumes, the quality of
the work is highly variable.]
	&lt;li&gt;Jung-Kyoo Choi and Samuel Bowles, &quot;The Coevolution of Parochial
Altruism and
War&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1144237&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Science&lt;/cite&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;318&lt;/strong&gt; (2007): 636--640&lt;/a&gt; [A &lt;em&gt;possible&lt;/em&gt; evolutionary
explanation for why humans would have war]
	&lt;li&gt;Daniel &lt;a href=&quot;dennett.html&quot;&gt;Dennett,&lt;/a&gt; &lt;cite&gt;Darwin's Dangerous
Idea&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a
href=&quot;http://dannyreviews.com/h/Darwins_Dangerous_Idea.html&quot;&gt;Review&lt;/a&gt; by
Danny Yee&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Reuven Dukas (ed.), &lt;cite&gt;Cognitive Ecology: The Evolutionary
Ecology of Information Processing and Decision Making&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Barbara Ehrenreich
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Blood Rites: Origins and History of the Passions of
War&lt;/cite&gt; [review in process]
		&lt;li&gt;(with Janet McIntosh) &lt;a
href=&quot;http://cogweb.ucla.edu/Debate/Ehrenreich.html&quot;&gt;&quot;The New
Creationism: Biology Under Attack&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Robert H. Frank, &lt;cite&gt;Passions within Reason: The Strategic Role
of the Emotions&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jeremyfreese.com/&quot;&gt;Jeremy Freese&lt;/a&gt; and Sheri
Meland, &quot;Seven-Tenths Incorrect: Heterogeneity and Change in Waist-to-Hip
Ratios of &lt;cite&gt;Playboy&lt;/cite&gt; Centerfold Models and Miss America Pageant
Winners&quot;, &lt;cite&gt;The Journal of Sex Research&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;39&lt;/strong&gt; (2002):
133--138 [This is, believe it or not, the main evidence behind some of the
claims about universal evolved male preferences for women with physical
attributes indicative of fertility; sadly, the original data by no means
support the conclusions drawn (and drawn and drawn). &lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.jeremyfreese.com/docs/FreeseMeland%20-%20SevenTenthsIncorrect.pdf&quot;&gt;PDF&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Sarah Blaffer Hrdy [&lt;a href=&quot;feminism.html&quot;&gt;Feminist&lt;/a&gt;
sociobiology]
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;The Langurs of Abu&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;The Woman That Never Evolved&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Mother Nature&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Ray Jackendoff, &lt;cite&gt;Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning,
Grammar, Evolution&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://bactra.org/reviews/jackendoff-foundations/&quot;&gt;Review: The
Object-Oriented Turn in Generative Grammar&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Melvin Konner, &quot;Darwin's Truth, Jefferson's Vision: Sociobiology
and the Politics of Human Nature,&quot; &lt;cite&gt;The American Prospect,&lt;/cite&gt; vol.
10, no. 45 (July 1999) [Repeats the myth about Marx wanting to dedicate
&lt;cite&gt;Capital&lt;/cite&gt; to Darwin, but otherwise on-target.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prospect.org/print-friendly/print/V10/45/konner-m.html&quot;&gt;Online&lt;/a&gt;.]
	&lt;li&gt;Gary Marcus
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Birth of the Mind: How a Tiny Number of Genes Creates
the Complexity of Human Thought&lt;/cite&gt; [This book avoids the usual arguments
about adaption and the like to focus on the question of whether the genome has
sufficient power to reliable specify details of mental strcuture.  (This is a
more basic question, because if the answer is &quot;no&quot;, then the questions about
adaptation, etc., are moot, and if the answer is &quot;yes&quot;, knowing the nature and
limits of that power will tightly constrain our evolutionary hypotheses.)
Marcus's answer is &quot;yes&quot;, and I think both his answer and his argument for it
are definitely correct.  &lt;a href=&quot;development-bio.html&quot;&gt;Biological
development&lt;/a&gt;, whether of the brain or the body, is intricately
but &lt;em&gt;flexibly&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;responsively&lt;/em&gt; regulated by genes, and in fact
a large part of the genome exists simply to &lt;a
href=&quot;signal-transduction.html&quot;&gt;control gene expression and metabolic
activity&lt;/a&gt;.  These mechanisms are very good at &lt;em&gt;effectively&lt;/em&gt; producing
highly specific functional structures (e.g., ribs, arteries), especially when
those take a nice, cleanly recursive form (e.g., ribs, arteries), though they
do this by directly producing &lt;a
href=&quot;self-organization.html&quot;&gt;self-organizing&lt;/a&gt; mechanisms sensitive to
positional information.  Moreover it is important to recognize that the degree
to which brains are &lt;em&gt;plastic&lt;/em&gt; is almost entirely a separate question
from the degree to which some of their aspects are &lt;em&gt;innate&lt;/em&gt;, just as,
e.g., muscular development due to exercise, or wound healing, is separate from
normal developmental formation.  One thing Marcus rightly emphasizes is that
one expects, on general biological grounds, that a single gene will participate
in the development of &lt;em&gt;many&lt;/em&gt; different structures, and that new
functions will be effected through re-using old components.  So it is not at
all surprising if more recently evolved functions (e.g. &lt;a
href=&quot;linguistics.html&quot;&gt;language&lt;/a&gt;) have a similar architecture and genetic
basis to older ones (e.g. &lt;a href=&quot;seriatim.html&quot;&gt;control of rapid sequential
motion&lt;/a&gt;).  Similarly, one need not expect modular &lt;em&gt;functions&lt;/em&gt; to be
implemented by &lt;em&gt;distinct brain regions.&lt;/em&gt;  (There are interesting
parallels here to Soviet &lt;a href=&quot;neuropsychology.html&quot;&gt;neuropsychology&lt;/a&gt;, of
the Luria-&lt;a href=&quot;vygotsky.html&quot;&gt;Vygotsky&lt;/a&gt; type.)  --- Marcus has clearly
put a huge amount of time into mastering the primary literature in
developmental biology, and is thoroughly up-to-date on it, as well as extremely
good at cutting through conceptual confusions.  Moreover he writes very well,
and I really do think this book should be completely accessible to
reasonably-educated nonscientists.  It's a great trick and highly recommended.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.psych.nyu.edu/gary/birth.html&quot;&gt;Marcus's book website&lt;/a&gt;.]
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;Making the Mind: Why We've Misunderstood the
Nature-Nurture Debate&quot;, &lt;cite&gt;Boston Review&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;28.6&lt;/strong&gt; (2004)
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://bostonreview.net/BR28.6/marcus.html&quot;&gt;Online&lt;/a&gt;.  Brief
and even more popular summary of his book.]
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Linda Mealey, &quot;The Sociobiology of Sociopathy: An Integrated
Evolutionary Model&quot;, &lt;cite&gt;Behavioral and Brain Sciences&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.bbsonline.org/documents/a/00/00/05/20/&quot;&gt;Preprint&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Steven Pinker
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;How the Mind Works&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a
href=&quot;../reviews/how-the-mind-works/&quot;&gt;Review: On Seeing the Computational
Forest for the Cultural Trees&lt;/a&gt;]
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;The Language Instinct&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a
href=&quot;http://dannyreviews.com/h/The_Language_Instinct.html&quot;&gt;Review&lt;/a&gt; by Danny
Yee]
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Sara Shettleworth, &lt;cite&gt;Cognition, Evolution, and Behavior&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Eric A. Smith, Monique Borgerhoff Mulder and Kim Hill,
&quot;Controversies in the evolutionary social sciences: a guide for the
perplexed&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(00)02077-2&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Trends in Ecology
and Evolution&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;16&lt;/strong&gt; (2001): 128--134&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Janet Radcliffe Richards, &lt;cite&gt;Human Nature After Darwin&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Dan Sperber, &lt;cite&gt;Explaining Culture: The Naturalistic
Approach&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;../reviews/explaining-culture&quot;&gt;Review: How to Catch
Insanity from Your Kids (Among Others); or, &lt;cite&gt;Histoire naturelle de
l'infame&lt;/cite&gt;&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;Not exactly recommended:
	&lt;li&gt;Alexandra Maryanski and Jonathan H. Turner, &lt;cite&gt;The Social
Cage: Human Nature and the Evolution of Society&lt;/cite&gt; [Discussed under
&lt;a href=&quot;modernity.html&quot;&gt;Modernity&lt;/a&gt;]
      &lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;To read:
	&lt;li&gt;Riadh T. Abed and Karel W. de Pauw, &quot;An Evolutionary Hypothesis for
Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Psychological Immune System?&quot;,
&lt;cite&gt;Behavioural Neurology&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;11&lt;/strong&gt; (1999):245--250 [&lt;a
href=&quot;http://cogprints.soton.ac.uk/documents/disk0/00/00/11/47/&quot;&gt;online&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Michael L. Anderson, &quot;Massive redeployment, exaptation, and the
functional integration of cognitive
operations&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11229-007-9233-2&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Synthese&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;159&lt;/strong&gt;
(2007): 329--345&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Jerome Barkow (ed.), &lt;cite&gt;Darwin, Sex and Status: Biological
Approaches to Mind and Culture&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;H. Clark Barrett, &quot;On the functional origins of essentialism&quot; [&lt;a
href=&quot;http://cogprints.soton.ac.uk/documents/disk0/00/00/17/29/&quot;&gt;online&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Marc Bekoff et al. (eds.), &lt;cite&gt;The Cognitive Animal: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives on Animal Cognition&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Radu J. Bogdan
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;citE&gt;Interpreting Minds: The Evolution of a
Practice&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a hrf=&quot;http://mitpress.mit.edu/0-262-52417-1&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/A&gt;]
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Minding Minds: Evolving a Reflexive Mind by Interpreting
Others&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://mitpress.mit.edu/0-262-52418-X&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Brown, &lt;cite&gt;Human Universals&lt;/cite&gt; [The Postal Service stole my
copy; I'd like to get it back someday...]
	&lt;li&gt;Martine Brune, &quot;Schizophrenia---an evolutionary engima?&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2003.10.002&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Neuroscience and
Biobehavioral Reviews&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;28&lt;/strong&gt; (2004): 41--53&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;David Buller, &lt;cite&gt;Adapting Minds: Evolutionary Psychology and the
Persistent Quest for Human Nature&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a
href=&quot;http://mitpress.mit.edu/0262025795&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Raffaele Calabretta, Andrea Di Ferdinando, G&amp;uuml;nter P. Wagner
and Domenico Parisi, &quot;What does it take to evolve behaviorally complex
organisms?&quot; [&lt;a
href=&quot;http://cogprints.soton.ac.uk/documents/disk0/00/00/23/24/&quot;&gt;online&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Anne Campbell, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.bbsonline.org/documents/a/00/00/04/40/&quot;&gt;Staying Alive:
Evolution, Culture and Women's Intra-Sexual Aggression&lt;/a&gt; (target article
in &lt;cite&gt;BBS&lt;/cite&gt;)
	&lt;li&gt;Angelo Cangelosi and Domenico Parisi, &quot;How nouns and verbs
differentially affect the behavior of artificial organisms&quot; [&lt;a
href=&quot;http://cogprints.soton.ac.uk/documents/disk0/00/00/20/20/&quot;&gt;online&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Angelo Cangelosi and Steven Harnad, &quot;The adaptive advantage of
symbolic theft over sensorimotor toil: Grounding language in perceptual
categories&quot; [&lt;a
href=&quot;http://cogprints.soton.ac.uk/documents/disk0/00/00/20/36/&quot;&gt;online&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Joseph Carroll, &lt;cite&gt;Evolution and Literary Theory&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a
href=&quot;http://mysite.freeserve.com/jbcpub/carroll.html&quot;&gt;Review by John
Constable&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;C. Sue Carter &lt;em&gt;et al.&lt;/em&gt; (eds.), &lt;cite&gt;The Integrative
Neurobiology of Affiliation&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Dorothy L. Cheney and Robert M. Seyfarth
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Baboon Metaphysics: The Evolution of a Social
Mind&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.press.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/hfs.cgi/00/225832.ctl&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;How Monkeys See the World: Inside the Mind of Another Species&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.press.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/hfs.cgi/00/7050.ctl&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Murray Clarke, &lt;cite&gt;Reconstructing Reason and Representation&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http;//mitpress.mit.edu/0-262-03322-4&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://mysite.freeserve.com/jbcpub/jbc.html&quot;&gt;John
Constable&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Holk Cruse, &quot;The Evolution of Cognition --- A Hypothesis,&quot;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(02)00110-6&quot;&gt;&lt;citE&gt;Cognitive
Science&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;27&lt;/strong&gt; (2003): 135--155&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;darwin.html&quot;&gt;Darwin&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;The Descent of Man&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;The Expression of Emotions in Animals and Man&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Gavin de Becker, &lt;cite&gt;The Gift of Fear: Survival Signals That
Protect Us from Violence&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Frans B. M. de Waal and Peter L. Tyack (eds.), &lt;cite&gt;Animal Social
Complexity: Intelligence, Culture, and Individualized Societies&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a
href=&quot;http://dannyreviews.com/h/Animal_Social_Complexity.html&quot;&gt;Review by Danny
Yee&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jeremyfreese.com/&quot;&gt;Jeremy
Freese&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;What Should Sociology Do About Darwin?: Evaluating
Some Potential Contributions of Sociobiology and Evolutionary Psychology to
Sociology&lt;/cite&gt; [Ph.D. thesis, Indiana University, 2000; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.jeremyfreese.com/docs/freese_dissertation.pdf&quot;&gt;PDF&lt;/a&gt;]
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;The Problem of Predictive Promiscuity in Deductive
Applications of Evolutionary Reasoning to Intergenerational Transfers: Three
Cautionary Tales&quot;
[&lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.jeremyfreese.com/docs/Freese-PredictivePromiscuity.pdf&quot;&gt;PDF&lt;/a&gt;]
		&lt;li&gt;JF, Jui-Chung Allen Li, and Lisa D. Wade, &quot;The Potential Relevances of Biology to 
Social Inquiry&quot;, &lt;cite&gt;Annual Review of Sociology&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;29&lt;/strong&gt;
(2003): 233--256 [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jeremyfreese.com/docs/FreeseLiWadeARS2003.pdf&quot;&gt;PDF reprint&lt;/a&gt;]
		&lt;li&gt;and Brian Powell, &quot;Rebel without a Cause or Effect: Birth
Order and Social Attitudes&quot;, &lt;cite&gt;American Sociological Review&lt;/cite&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;64&lt;/strong&gt; (1999): 207--231 [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jeremyfreese.com/docs/FreesePowellSteelman%20-%20rebel%20without%20a%20cause%20or%20effect.pdf&quot;&gt;PDF reprint&lt;/a&gt;.  Sulloway's ideas never made much sense to me anyway...]
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Michael S. Gazzaniga
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;citE&gt;The Mind's Past&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;citE&gt;Nature's Mind: The Biological Roots of Thinking,
Emotions, Sexuality, Language and Intelligence&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Paul Glimcher, &lt;cite&gt;Decisions, Uncertainty, and the Brain: Science
of Neuroeconomics&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://mitpress.mit.edu/0-262-57227-3&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Paul E. Griffiths, &quot;Evo-Devo Meets the Mind: Towards a
Developmental Evolutionary Psychology&quot; [&lt;a
href=&quot;http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/documents/disk0/00/00/04/95/&quot;&gt;online&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Esther Herrmann, Josep Call, Mar{\'i}a Victoria Hern{\`a}ndez-Lloreda, Brian Hare and Michael Tomasello,
&quot;Humans Have Evolved Specialized Skills of Social Cognition: The Cultural Intelligence Hypothesis&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1146282&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Science&lt;/citE&gt; &lt;strong&gt;317&lt;/strong&gt; (2007): 1360--1366&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Nicole C. Hess and Edward H. Hagen, &quot;Informational Warfare&quot; [&lt;a
href=&quot;http://cogprints.soton.ac.uk/documents/disk0/00/00/21/12/&quot;&gt;online&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Sarah Blaffer Hrdy, &lt;cite&gt;Mothers and Others: The Evolutionary
Origins of Mutual Understanding&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog/HRDMOT.html&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Nicholas Humphrey, &quot;The Social Function of Intellect&quot; [&lt;a
href=&quot;http://cogprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/archive/00002694/&quot;&gt;online&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Alison Jolly, &lt;cite&gt;Lucy's Legacy: Sex and Intelligence in
Human evolution&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Kaplan and Kaplan, &lt;cite&gt;Cognition and Environment: Functioning in
an Uncertain World&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Peter M. Kappeler and Michael E. Pereira (eds.), &lt;cite&gt;Primate Life
Histories and Socioecology&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.press.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/hfs.cgi/00/15344.ctl&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Chris Knight et al. (eds.), &lt;cite&gt;The Evolutionary Emergence of
Language: Social Function and the Origins of Linguistic Form&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Melvin Konner, &lt;cite&gt;The Tangled Wing: Biological Constraints on
the Human Spirit&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;P. C. Lee (ed.), &lt;cite&gt;Comparative Primate Socioecology&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Elisabeth A. Lloyd, &lt;cite&gt;The Case of the Female Orgasm:
Bias in the Science of Evolution&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Konrad Lorenz
		   &lt;ul&gt;
		   &lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Evolution and the Modification of Behavior&lt;/cite&gt;
		   &lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;The Natural Science of the Human Species&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://mitpress.mit.edu/0-262-62120-7&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
		   &lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Bobbi Low, &lt;cite&gt;Why Sex Matters: A Darwinian Look at Human
Behavior&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://press.princeton.edu/titles/6684.html&quot;&gt;Blurb,
ch. 1&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Edouard Machery, &quot;Massive Modularity and Brain Evolution&quot;,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00002972/&quot;&gt;phil-sci/2972&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Steven Mithen, &lt;cite&gt;The Prehistory of Mind: The Cognitive Origins
of Art and Science&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Sue Taylor Parker and Michael L. McKinney, &lt;cite&gt;Origins of
Intelligence: The Evolution of Cognitive Development in Monkeys, Apes and
Humans&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.americanscientist.org/template/BookReviewTypeDetail/assetid/26507&quot;&gt;Review
by Clive D. L. Wynne in &lt;cite&gt;American Scientist&lt;/cite&gt;&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Derek C. Penn, Keith J. Holyoak and dAniel J. Povinelli,
&quot;Darwin's mistake: Explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X08003543&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Behavioral and Brain Sceinces&lt;/cite&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;31&lt;/strong&gt; (2008): 109--130&lt;/a&gt; + commentary (pp. 130--153) and
response (pp. 153--178)
[&lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Penn-01062006/Referees/Penn-01062006_bbs-preprint.htm&quot;&gt;PDF
preprint&lt;/a&gt;; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://scienceblogs.com/mixingmemory/2008/05/darwins_mistake.php&quot;&gt;remarks&lt;/a&gt;
at &lt;a href=&quot;&quot;&gt;Mixing Memory&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Pinker, &lt;cite&gt;The Blank Slate&lt;/cite&gt; [Review by Steven Johnson
in, of all places, &lt;cite&gt;The Nation&lt;/cite&gt;: &lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20021118&amp;s=johnson&quot;&gt;Sociobiology and
You&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Henry Plotkin
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Evolution in Mind&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Necessary Knowledge&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/Psychology/Cognitive/?view=usa&amp;ci=9780198568285&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Robert C. Richardson, &lt;cite&gt;Evolutionary Psychology as Maladapted Psychology&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://mitpress.mit.edu/978-0-262-18260-7&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Paul H. Rubin, &lt;citE&gt;Darwinian Politics: The Evolutionary Origin
of Freedom&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Paul Seabright, &lt;cite&gt;The Company of Strangers: A Natural History
of Economic Life&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://press.princeton.edu/titles/7706.html&quot;&gt;Blurb, introduction&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (ed.), &lt;cite&gt;Moral Psychology&lt;/citE&gt;
		&lt;ol&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;The Evolution of Morality: Adaptations and
Innateness&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://mitpress.mit.edu/978-0-262-69354-7&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;The Cognitive Science of Morality: Intuition and
Diversity&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://mitpress.mit.edu/978-0-262-69357-8&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;The Neuroscience of Morality: Emotion, Brain
Disorders, and Development&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://mitpress.mit.edu/978-0-262-69355-4&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
		&lt;/ol&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Daniel Lord Smail, &lt;cite&gt;On Deep History and the Brain&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ucpress.edu/books/pages/10764.html&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Kim Sterelny, &lt;cite&gt;Thought in a Hostile World: The Evolution of
Human Cognition&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Georg F. Striedter, &quot;Precis of &lt;cite&gt;Principles of Brain
Evolution&lt;/cite&gt;&quot;,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X06009010&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Behavioral and
Brain Sciences&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;29&lt;/strong&gt; (2006): 1--12&lt;/a&gt; [With extensive
peer commentary following]
	&lt;li&gt;Karen B. Strier, &lt;cite&gt;Primate Behavioral Ecology&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Jean Suplizio, &quot;Evolutionary Psychology: The Academic Debate&quot;,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0269889706000883&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Science in
Context&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;19&lt;/strong&gt; (2006): 269--293&lt;/a&gt; [&quot;the evolutionary
psychologists shortchange practitioners from the fields of biological
anthropology, empirical linguistics, and developmental psychology. By doing so,
they miss the opportunity to benefit from work that could contribute to an
enhanced, albeit modified evolutionary psychology&quot;]
	&lt;li&gt;Michael Tomasello, &lt;cite&gt;The Cultural Origins of Human
Cognition&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog/TOMCUL.html&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;.  Some
reading notes at the excellent
blog &lt;a href=&quot;http://scienceblogs.com/mixingmemory/&quot;&gt;Mixing Memory&lt;/a&gt;:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://mixingmemory.blogspot.com/2005/08/cultural-origins-of-human-cognition.html&quot;&gt;introduction&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://mixingmemory.blogspot.com/2005/08/cogblog-tomasello-chapter-1.html&quot;&gt;chapter 1&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://mixingmemory.blogspot.com/2005/08/cogbloggroup-tomasello-chapter-2-part.html&quot;&gt;2a&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://mixingmemory.blogspot.com/2005/08/cogbloggroup-tomasello-ch-2-part-2.html&quot;&gt;2b&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;John Tooby and Leda Cosmides, &quot;Conceptual Foundations of
Evolutionary Psychology&quot; [&lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.psych.ucsb.edu/research/cep/papers/bussconceptual05.pdf&quot;&gt;PDF
preprint&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Griet Vandermassen, &lt;cite&gt;Who's Afraid of Charles Darwin?  Debating
Feminism and Evolutionary Theory&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Thomas W. Volscho, &quot;Money and Sex, the Illusory Universal Sex
Difference: Comment on Kanazawa&quot;, &lt;citE&gt;The Sociological Quarterly&lt;/citE&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;46&lt;/strong&gt; (2005): 719--736
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://vm.uconn.edu/~twv00001/tsq.pdf&quot;&gt;PDF reprint&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iaccess.com.br/~dennis/&quot;&gt;Dennis Werner&lt;/a&gt;,
&lt;cite&gt;Darwinist Epistemology and Anthropology: An Evolutionary Look at How
Animals, Humans and Intellectuals Think&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Anna Wierzbicka, &lt;cite&gt;Semantics, Culture and Cognition: Universal
Human Concepts in Culture-Specific Configurations&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Arthur P. Wolf and William H. Durham (eds.), &lt;cite&gt;Inbreeding, Incest, and the Incest Taboo:
The State of Knowledge at the Turn of the Century&lt;/cite&gt; [i.e., 2004.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sup.org/book.cgi?id=4520&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Marlene Zuk, &lt;cite&gt;Sexual Selections: What We Can and Can't Learn
About Sex from Animals&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.ucpress.edu/books/pages/9600.html&quot;&gt;Blurb, intro&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>