<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- name="generator" content="blosxom/2.0" -->
<!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN" "http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd">

<rss version="0.91">
  <channel>
    <title>Notebooks   </title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks</link>
    <description>Cosma's Notebooks</description>
    <language>en</language>

  <item>
    <title>History, Historiography, Uses of the Past</title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks/1994/10/03#history</link>
    <description>
&lt;P&gt;Cf.
	&lt;a href=&quot;archaeology.html&quot;&gt;Archaeology&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;historical-materialism.html&quot;&gt;Historical Materialism&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;nationalism.html&quot;&gt;Nationalism&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;scientific-method.html&quot;&gt;Scientific Method&lt;/a&gt;


&lt;ul&gt;Recommended:
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;barzun.html&quot;&gt;Jacques Barzun&lt;/a&gt; and Henry Graff, &lt;cite&gt;The
Modern Researcher&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Donald E. Brown, &lt;cite&gt;Hierarchy, History, and Human Nature: The Social Origins of Historical Consciousness&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Peter Burke, &lt;cite&gt;The Renaissance Sense of the Past&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Jared Diamond, &lt;cite&gt;Guns, Germs and Steel&lt;/cite&gt; [The only
genuinely scientific approach to history I've ever seen.  Brilliant and
utterly convincing.  Doesn't so much put forward a theory of historiography
as exemplify an implicit one.]
	&lt;li&gt;David Hackett Fischer, &lt;cite&gt;Historians' Fallacies: Towards a Logic
of Historical Thought&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Carlo Ginzburg, &lt;cite&gt;Clues, Myths, and the Historical
Method&lt;/cite&gt; [Interesting, with much food for thought, but not fully
convincing.  His discussion of &quot;clues&quot;, for instance, (a) doesn't mention the
&lt;a href=&quot;scientific-method.html&quot;&gt;philosophy-of-science&lt;/a&gt; discussion of
hypothetico-deductive method at all, which is intensely puzzling since that's
basically what he's talking about; (b) doesn't mention Helmholtz (whose work
made the idea of &quot;unconscious inference&quot; from sensory cues to the external
world a huge part of psychology); (c) draws the untenable distinction he does
between generalizing, &quot;Galilean&quot; sciences, e.g. astronomy, and particularizing,
historical sciences --- since the diagnoses in the particular case depends on
general principles (e.g., to appropriate one of his examples, each artist has a
certain, stable and distinct, way of drawing hands), and generalizing sciences
attempt to explain and deal with particular cases (why did &lt;em&gt;this&lt;/em&gt;
reaction-vessel turn red, the cause of &lt;em&gt;that&lt;/em&gt; supernova); and (d) claims
that the intellectual changes he describes were somehow &lt;em&gt;motivated&lt;/em&gt; by
the class struggles, claims he doesn't even begin to support.  Nonetheless, his
discussion of &quot;clues&quot; has a lot of interesting material and obervations.]
	&lt;li&gt;E. J. Hobsbawm, &lt;cite&gt;On History&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Marshall Hodgson, &lt;cite&gt;The Venture of Islam&lt;/cite&gt; [The
Introduction to vol. I has a very fine methodological disscussion]
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;ibn-khaldun.html&quot;&gt;ibn Khald&amp;ucirc;n&lt;/a&gt;,
&lt;cite&gt;The Muqaddimah&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;popper.html&quot;&gt;Karl Popper&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;cite&gt;The Poverty of
Historicism&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;David Stannard, &lt;cite&gt;Shrinking History&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a
href=&quot;../reviews/shrinking-history/&quot;&gt;Review: A Strange Delusion of the Recent
Past&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;E. P. Thompson, &lt;cite&gt;The Poverty of Theory and Other Essays&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Charles Tilly, &lt;cite&gt;Big Structures, Large Processes, Huge
Comparisons&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;../weblog/algae-2008-07.html#big-structures&quot;&gt;Mini-review&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Edmund Wilson, &lt;cite&gt;To the Finland Station: A Study in the Writing
and Acting of History&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;To read:
       &lt;li&gt;Raymond Aron, &lt;cite&gt;Introduction to the Philosophy of History: An
Essay on the Limits of Historical Objectivity&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Peter Bearman, James Moody and Robert Faris, &quot;Networks and History&quot;
&lt;a
href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cplx.10054&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Complexity&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;8&lt;/strong&gt;
(2002): 61--71&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Mark Bevir, &lt;cite&gt;The Logic of the History of Ideas&lt;/citE&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/9780521016841&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Collingwood, &lt;cite&gt;The Idea of History&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Danto, &lt;cite&gt;Analytical Philosophy of History&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Finley, &lt;cite&gt;Ancient History: Evidence and Models&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a
href=&quot; http://dannyreviews.com/h/Ancient_History.html&quot;&gt;Review by Danny Yee&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;George M. Frederickson, &lt;cite&gt;The Comparative Imagination: On the
History of Racism, Nationalism, and Social Movements&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.escholarship.org/editions/view?docId=ft9p300976&quot;&gt;Free
online&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Carlo Ginzburg, &lt;cite&gt;History, Rhetoric and Proof&lt;/citE&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Anthony Grafton, &lt;cite&gt;What Was History?: The Art of History in Early Modern Europe&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/9780521697149&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Goeffrey Hawthorn, &lt;cite&gt;Plausible Worlds: Possibility and
Understanding in History and the Social Sciences&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/0521457769&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Martha Howell and Walter Prevenier, &lt;cite&gt;From Reliable
Sources: An Introduction to Historical Methods&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Tarif Khalidi, &lt;cite&gt;Arabic Historical Thought in the Classical
Period&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/9780521589383&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;David Lowenthal, &lt;cite&gt;The Heritage Crusade and the Spoils of
History&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/0521635624&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Chase F. Robinson, &lt;cite&gt;Islamic Historiography&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;G. Simmel, &lt;cite&gt;The Problems of the Philosophy of History&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Rosalind Thomas, &lt;citE&gt;Herodotus in Context: Ethnography, Science
and the Art of Persuasion&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/0521012414&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;White, &lt;cite&gt;Foundations of Historical Knowledge&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Rosalind Williams, &lt;cite&gt;Retooling&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>