<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- name="generator" content="blosxom/2.0" -->
<!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN" "http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd">

<rss version="0.91">
  <channel>
    <title>Notebooks   </title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks</link>
    <description>Cosma's Notebooks</description>
    <language>en</language>

  <item>
    <title>Institutions and Organizations</title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks/2010/02/10#institutions</link>
    <description>
&lt;blockquote&gt;Institutions keep society from falling apart, provided that there
is something to keep institutions from falling apart.
	&lt;br&gt;---Jon Elster, &lt;cite&gt;Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences,&lt;/cite&gt;
ch. 15&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Institutional economics (old-style &lt;em&gt;&amp;agrave; la&lt;/em&gt; Commons;
neo-institutional &lt;em&gt;&amp;agrave; la&lt;/em&gt; Douglass North; new institutional
&lt;em&gt;&amp;agrave; la&lt;/em&gt; Williamson).  Empirical studies of different sorts of
economic institutions.  Industrial organization and market structure
(institutions beyond the bounds of any one formal organization).  Organization
theory.  Theories of institutional change, formation.  Difference between
institutions which are products of policy and those which are products of
custom.  (Intermediate cases abound
naturally.)  &lt;a href=&quot;evol-econ.html&quot;&gt;Evolutionary
economics&lt;/a&gt;.  &lt;a href=&quot;memes.html&quot;&gt;Memes&lt;/a&gt;.  Institutional design.
Centralized vs. decentralized institutions.  Corruption.  Distribution of power
vs. formal organization.  History of bureaucracy and other sorts of formal
organization.  (Did Europeans take civil service exams from China?  How did
they evolve in China?)  Game-theoretic approaches.  Simulations.  Spontaneous
formation of institutions.  How, &lt;em&gt;exactly&lt;/em&gt;, do &quot;institutions matter&quot;
in &lt;a href=&quot;development-econ.html&quot;&gt;economic development and growth&lt;/a&gt;?  Why do
the contributions from &lt;a href=&quot;economics.html&quot;&gt;economics&lt;/a&gt; seem so much more
convincing than those from &lt;a href=&quot;sociology.html&quot;&gt;sociology&lt;/a&gt;?

&lt;P&gt;&lt;em&gt;See also&lt;/em&gt;:
	&lt;a href=&quot;collective-action.html&quot;&gt;Collective Action&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;collective-cognition.html&quot;&gt;Collective Cognition&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;networks-of-political-actors.html&quot;&gt;Networks of Political Actors&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;political-decision-making.html&quot;&gt;Political Decision Making&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;Recommended:
	&lt;li&gt;Kenneth Arrow
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Social Choice and Individual Values&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://cowles.econ.yale.edu/P/cm/m12-2/&quot;&gt;Full text free online&lt;/a&gt;]
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;The Limits of Organization&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;F. G. Bailey, &lt;cite&gt;Humbuggery and Manipulation: The Art of
Leadership&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Roland B&amp;eacute;nabou, &quot;Groupthink: Collective Delusions in
Organizations and Markets&quot;
[&lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.princeton.edu/~rbenabou/groupthink%20iom%204l%20new2.pdf&quot;&gt;PDF
preprint&lt;/a&gt;.  A really brilliant paper on &quot;individually rational collective
reality denial in groups, organizations and markets&quot;.]
	&lt;li&gt;James Beniger, &lt;cite&gt;The Control Revolution: Technological and
Economic Origins of the Information Society&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a
href=&quot;../reviews/beniger/&quot;&gt;Review&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Samuel Bowles, &lt;cite&gt;Microeconomics: Behavior, Institutions, and
Evolution&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Colin Crouch and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.crookedtimber.org/&quot;&gt;Henry
Farrell&lt;/a&gt;, &quot;Breaking the Path of Institutional Development?  Alternatives to
the New Determinism&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1043463104039874&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Rationality and
Society&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;16&lt;/strong&gt; (2004): 5--43&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;R. A. Dahl and C. E. Lindblom, &lt;cite&gt;Politics, Economics and
Welfare: Planning and Politico-Economic Systems Resolved into Basic Social
Processes&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Jerker Denrell, &quot;Radical Organization Theory: An Incomplete
Contract Approach to Power and Organizational Design&quot;, &lt;cite&gt;Rationality and
Society&lt;/cite &lt;strong&gt;12&lt;/strong&gt; (2000): 39--66 [Commentary
&lt;a href=&quot;../weblog/274.html&quot;&gt;elsewhere&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Steven N. Durlauf and H. Peyton Young (eds.), &lt;cite&gt;Social
Dynamics&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Thr&amp;aacute;inn Eggertsson, &lt;cite&gt;Economic Behavior and
Institutions&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a
href=&quot;../reviews/economic-behavior-and-institutions/&quot;&gt;Review: &lt;em&gt;Homo
economicus&lt;/em&gt; on the Grand Tour, or, When Is a Lizard a Good Enough Dragon
for Government Work?&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Henry Farrell and Jack Knight, &quot;Trust and Institutional Compliance&quot;
[Thanks to Henry for a preprint]
	&lt;li&gt;John Kenneth Galbraith, &lt;cite&gt;The New Industrial State&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Bennett Harrison, &lt;cite&gt;Lean and Mean&lt;/cite&gt; [As an example of how
to analyze a particular set of institutions and formal organizations]
	&lt;li&gt;F. A. Hayek, &quot;Use of Knowledge in Society&quot; and &quot;Economics and
Knowledge&quot; in &lt;cite&gt;Individualism and Economic Order&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Albert O. Hirschman, &lt;cite&gt;Exit, Voice and Loyalty&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Rakesh Khurana, &lt;cite&gt;Searching for a Corporate Savior: The
Irrational Quest for Charismatic CEOs&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Jack Knight, &lt;cite&gt;Institutions and Social Conflict&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;James March and Herbert Simon, &lt;cite&gt;Organizations&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Gary J. Miller, &lt;cite&gt;Managerial Dilemmas: The Political Economy of
Hierarchy&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://laniels.org/weblog/2008/02/29/gary-j-miller-managerial-dilemmas-the-political-economy-of-hierarchy/&quot;&gt;Review by Stephen Laniel&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Mancur Olson, &lt;cite&gt;The Logic of Collective Action&lt;/cite&gt; [How
groups work, and why volunteerism is almost never sufficient to secure public
goods.  (Short version: if it's a public good, i.e. one from which everyone
benefits without exclusion, why should &lt;em&gt;you&lt;/em&gt; put yourself out to secure
it?  Surely somebody else will...  Olson provides a detailed economic analysis
to flesh this out.)  How interest groups work, why people won't show up to
union meetings but will overwhelmingly vote to make union membership
compulsory, taxes and government, the weakness of large classes, etc., etc. 
Brilliant.]
	&lt;li&gt;Thomas Schelling, &lt;cite&gt;Micromotives and Macrobehavior&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;simon.html&quot;&gt;Herbert Simon&lt;/a&gt;, &quot;Organizations and
Markets,&quot; &lt;cite&gt;Journal of Economic Perspectives,&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;5&lt;/strong&gt;
(1991) 25--44 [Collected in &lt;citE&gt;Models of Bounded Rationality,&lt;/cite&gt; vol.
III; see also ch. 2 of his &lt;cite&gt;Sciences of the Artificial&lt;/cite&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;H. Preyton Young, &lt;cite&gt;Individual Strategy and Social Structure:
An Evolutionary Theory of Institutions&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a
href=&quot;../reviews/young-strategy-and-structure/&quot;&gt;Review: A Myopic (and Sometimes
Blind) Eye on the Main Chance, or, the Origins of Custom&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;To read:
	&lt;li&gt;Howard Aldrich, &lt;citE&gt;Organizations Evolving&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Masahiko Aoki, &lt;cite&gt;Toward a Comparative Institutional
Analysis&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://mitpress.mit.edu/0-262-01187-5&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;G. C. Archibald, &lt;cite&gt;Information, Incentives and the Economics of
Control&lt;/cite&gt; [&quot;examines methods for controlling or guiding a sector of the
economy that do not require all the apparatus of economic planning or rely on
the vain hope of sufficiently 'perfect' competition, but instead rely entirely
on the self-interest of economic agents and voluntary contract. The methods
involved require trial-and-error steps in real time, with the target adjusted
as the results of each step become
known.&quot;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/0521022797&quot;&gt;Full blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;A. Baronchelli, L. Dall'Asta, A. Barrat, V. Loreto,
&quot;Non-equilibrium phase transition in negotiation dynamics&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0611717&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0611717&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Lee Roy Beach, &lt;cite&gt;The Psychology of Decision Making: People in
Organizations&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Roland B&amp;eacute;nabou, &quot;Groupthink: Collective
Delusions in Organizations and Markets&quot; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.princeton.edu/~rbenabou/groupthink%20iom%204l%20new2.pdf&quot;&gt;PDF preprint&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Yochai Benkler, &quot;Coase's Penguin, or Linux and the Nature of the
Firm,&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.CY/0109077&quot;&gt;cs.CY/0109077&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Samuel Bowles and Suresh Naidu, &quot;Persistent Institutions&quot;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://tuvalu.santafe.edu/~bowles/PersistentInst.pdf&quot;&gt;PDF preprint&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Samuel Bowles and Herbert Gintis, &quot;The Evolutionary Basis of
Collective Action&quot;, forthcoming in the &lt;cite&gt;Oxford Handbook of Political
Economy&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.umass.edu/preferen/gintis/Evolutionary%20Origins%20of%20Collective%20Action.pdf&quot;&gt;PDF
preprint&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Ori Brafman and Rod Beckstrom, &lt;cite&gt;The Starfish and the Spider:
The Unstoppable Power of Leaderless Organizations&lt;/cite&gt; [sounds dubious,
but worth looking at]
	&lt;li&gt;David Braybrooke (ed.), &lt;cite&gt;Social Rules: Origin; Character;
Logic; Change&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.perseusbooksgroup.com/perseus-cgi-bin/display/0-8133-9103-2&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Daniel W. Bromley, &lt;cite&gt;Sufficient Reason: Volitional Pragmatism
and the Meaning of Economic Institutions&lt;/citE&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://pup.princeton.edu/titles/8178.html&quot;&gt;Blurb, ch. 1&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Francesca Cancian, &lt;cite&gt;What Are Norms?&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://people.hmdc.harvard.edu/~dcarpent/stoch1.htm&quot;&gt;Dan
Carpenter&lt;/a&gt;, &quot;Adaptive Signal Processing, Hierarchy, and Budgetary Control in
Federal Regulation&quot;, &lt;cite&gt;American Political Science
Review&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;90&lt;/strong&gt; (1996): 283--302
	&lt;li&gt;Glenn R. Carroll and Michael T. Hannan, &lt;cite&gt;The Demography of
Corporations and Industries&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Alfred Chandler
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;The Visible Hand&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Scale and Scope&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Strategy and Structure&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;David Chisholm, &lt;cite&gt;Coordination without Hierarchy: Informal
Structures in Multiorganizational Systems&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.escholarship.org/editions/view?docId=ft4d5nb38m&quot;&gt;Free
online&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;John Commons, &lt;cite&gt;Institutional Economics: Its Place in Political
Economy&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Alex Cooley, &lt;cite&gt;Logics of Hierarchy: The Organization of
Empires, States and Military Occupations&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/cup_detail.taf?ti_id=4378&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Barbara Czarniawska, &lt;cite&gt;Narrating the Organization: Dramas of
Institutional Identity&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Paul J. DiMaggio and Walter W. Powell, &quot;The Iron Cage Revisited:
Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational
Fields&quot;, &lt;cite&gt;American Sociological Review&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;48&lt;/strong&gt; (1983):
147--160 [&quot;Once a set of organizations emerges as a field, a paradox arises:
rational actors make their organizations increasingly similar as they try to
change
them.&quot;  &lt;a
href=&quot;http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0003-1224(198304)48%3A2%3C147%3ATICRII%3E2.0.CO%3B2-S&quot;&gt;JSTOR&lt;/a&gt;.
&quot;Isomorphism&quot; seems like the wrong word.]
	&lt;li&gt;Avinash K. Dixit, &lt;cite&gt;Lawlessness and Economics: Alternative
Modes of Governance&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Tom Douglas, &lt;cite&gt;Change, Intervention and Consequence: An
Exploration of the Process of Intended Change&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Robert Edgerton, &lt;cite&gt;Rules, Exceptions and Social Order&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Thrainn Eggertsson, &lt;cite&gt;Imperfect Institutions: Possibilities and Limits of Reform&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Jon Elster, Clauss Offe and Ulrich K. Preuss, &lt;cite&gt;Institutional
Design in Post-communist Societies: Rebuilding the Ship at Sea&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://henryfarrell.net/&quot;&gt;Henry Farrell&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;cite&gt;The Political Economy of Trust: Institutions,
Interests, and Inter-Firm Cooperation in Italy and Germany&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/9780521886499&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Robert C. Feenstra and Gordon H. Hanson, &quot;Ownership and Control in
Outsourcing to China: Estimating the Property-Rights Theory of the Firm&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/0033553053970188&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;The Quarterly Journal
of Economics&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;120&lt;/strong&gt; (2005): 729--761&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;N. Fligstein, &quot;Fields, Power and Social Skill: Critical Analysis of
the New Institutionalisms&quot;[&lt;a
href=&quot;http://sociology.berkeley.edu/faculty/fligstein/fieldspower.pdf&quot;&gt;PDF&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Diego Gambetta, &lt;cite&gt;The Sicilian Mafia: The Business of Private
Protection&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Robert E. Goodin (ed.), &lt;cite&gt;The Theory of Institutional
Design&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Avner Greif, &lt;citE&gt;Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy:
Lessons from Medieval Trade&lt;/cite&gt; [Full text of a draft available as a &lt;a
href=&quot;http://www-econ.stanford.edu/faculty/Greif_Instutions/GreifBook.html&quot;&gt;series
of single-chapter PDFs&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Judith Gruber, &lt;cite&gt;Controlling Bureaucracies: Dilemmas in
Democratic Governance&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a hrf=&quot;http://ark.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/ft1g500470/&quot;&gt;online&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Michael T. Hannan and John Freeman, &lt;cite&gt;Organizational
Ecology&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;J. Richard Harrison and Glenn R. Carroll, &lt;cite&gt;Culture and
Demography in Organizations&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://pup.princeton.edu/titles/8183.html&quot;&gt;Blurb, ch. 1&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Bryan D. Jones, &lt;cite&gt;Politics and the Architecture of Choice&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Eric L. Jones, &lt;cite&gt;Cultures Merging: A Historical and
Economic Critique of Culture&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pupress.princeton.edu/titles/8158.html&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Michael Kenney, &lt;cite&gt;From Pablo to Osama: Trafficking and
Terrorist Networks, Government Bureaucracies, and Competitive Adaptation&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.psupress.org/books/titles/978-0-271-02931-3.html&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Martin Kilduff and David Krackhardt, &lt;cite&gt;Interpersonal Networks in Organizations: Cognition, Personality, Dynamics, and Culture&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/9780521866606&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Robert Klitgaard, &lt;cite&gt;Controlling Corruption&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Ken Kollman, John Miller and Scott Page (eds.), &lt;cite&gt;Computational
Models in Political Economy&lt;/citE&gt; [Always a good idea to read your boss's
books]
	&lt;li&gt;Neil Komesar, &lt;cite&gt;Imperfect Alternatives: Choosing Institutions
in Law, Economics and Public Policy&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.press.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/hfs.cgi/00/12655.ctl&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Jack H. Knott and Gary J. Miller, &lt;cite&gt;Reforming Bureaucracy: The
Politics of Institutional Choice&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;George Krause and Kennth Meier (eds.), &lt;cite&gt;Politics, Policy,
and Organizations: Frontiers in the Scientific Study of Bureaucracy&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;L. M. Lachmann, &lt;cite&gt;The Legacy of Max Weber: Three Essays&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mises.org/books/max-weber.pdf&quot;&gt;PDF&lt;/a&gt;.  Recommended
by &lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2007/05/the_legacy_of_m.html&quot;&gt;Tyler
Cowen&lt;/a&gt;.]
	&lt;li&gt;Lazonick, &lt;cite&gt;Business Organization and the Myth of the Market
Economy&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Youngki Lee, Lu&amp;iacute;s A. Nunes Amaral, David Canning, Martin
Meyer and H. Eugene Stanley, &quot;Universal Features in the Growth Dynamics of
Complex Organizations,&quot;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/9804100&quot;&gt;cond-mat/9804100&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Yi-min Lin, &lt;cite&gt;Between Politics and Markets: Firms, Competition,
and Institutional Change in Post-Mao China&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a
href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/0521604044&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Andrew J. Macintyre, &lt;cite&gt;The Power of Institutions: Political
Architecture and Governance&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;C. Mantzavinos, &lt;cite&gt;Individuals, Institutions, and Markets&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;C. Mantzavinos, Douglass C. North and Syed Shariq, &quot;Learning,
Institutions, and Economic Performance&quot;, &lt;cite&gt;Perspectives on Politics&lt;/cite&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;2&lt;/strong&gt; (2004): 75--84
	&lt;li&gt;Jerry Mashaw, &lt;cite&gt;Greed, Chaos and Governance&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Cathleen McGrath and David Krackhardt, &quot;Network Conditions for
Organizational Change&quot;, &lt;cite&gt;The Journal of Applied Behavioral
Science&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;39&lt;/strong&gt; (2003): 324--336
[&lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.andrew.cmu.edu/user/krack/documents/pubs/2003/2003%20Network%20Conditions%20for%20Organizational%20Change.pdf&quot;&gt;PDF
reprint&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;John McMillan, &lt;cite&gt;Reinventing the Bazaar: The Natural History of
Markets&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Max Neiman, &lt;cite&gt;Defending Government: Why Big Government
Works&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Daniel B. Neill, &quot;Cascade Effects in Heterogeneous Populations&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1043463105051633&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Rationality and
Society&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;17&lt;/strong&gt; (2005): 191--241&lt;/a&gt; [&quot;model of sequential
choice which explains the emergence and persistence of unpopular, inefficient
behavioral norms in society. We model individuals as naive Bayesian norm
followers, rational agents whose subjective expected utility is increased by
adherence to an established norm. Agents use Bayesian reasoning to combine
their private preferences and prior beliefs with empirical observations of
others' decisions. When agents must infer the preferences of others from
observation, this can result in negative cascades, causing the majority of
agents to choose a dispreferred action (because they believe, incorrectly, that
they are following the majority preference). We demonstrate that negative
cascades can result even when the degree of conformity is relatively low, and
under a wide range of conditions (including heterogeneity in preferences,
priors, and impact of public opinion)&quot;]
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.nobel.se/laureates/economy-1993-2-autobio.html&quot;&gt;Douglass
North&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;cite&gt;Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic
Performance&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bsos.umd.edu/gvpt/oppenheimer/&quot;&gt;Joe
Oppenheimer&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Elinor Ostrom
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Understanding Institutional Diversity in Open
Societies&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.indiana.edu/~workshop/ui/&quot;&gt;partial online
draft&lt;/a&gt;]
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Governing the Commons&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Ostrom, Gardner and Walker, &lt;cite&gt;Rules, Games and Common-Pool
Resources&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Elinor Ostrom and Harini Nagendra, &quot;Insights on linking forests,
trees, and people from the air, on the ground, and in the laboratory&quot;,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0607962103&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences&lt;/cite&gt; (USA) &lt;strong&gt;103&lt;/strong&gt; (2006):
19224--19231&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Scott Page, &quot;Uncertainty, Difficulty, and Complexity&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.santafe.edu/research/publications/wpabstract/199808076&quot;&gt;SFI
Working Paper 98-08-076&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Charles Perrow
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Normal Accidents&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Organizing America: Wealth, Power, and the Origins of
Corporate Capitalism&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;David A. Phillips, &lt;cite&gt;Reforming the World Bank: Twenty Years of
Trial &amp;mdash; and Error&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/9780521883054&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Paul Pierson, &lt;cite&gt;Politics in Time: History, Institutions and
Social Analysis&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://press.princeton.edu/titles/7872.html&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Amy R. Poteete, Marco A. Janssen and Elinor Ostrom, &lt;cite&gt;Working Together:
Collective Action, the Commons, and Multiple Methods in Practice&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://press.princeton.edu/titles/9209.html&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Adam Przeworksi, &quot;The Last Instance: Are Institutions the Primary
Cause of Economic Development?&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003975604001419&quot;&gt;&lt;citE&gt;European Journal of Sociology&lt;/cite&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;45&lt;/strong&gt; (2004): 165--188&lt;/a&gt; [&quot;neo-institutionalists claim that
institutions are the 'primary' cause of economic development, 'deeper' than the
supply of factors and methods for their use, which Marxists would call 'forces
of production'. Yet while the conclusion is different, the historical
narratives differ little across these perspectives. How, then, are such
conclusions derived? Can anything be said to be 'primary'? I conclude that
'causal primacy' is an answer to an incorrectly posed question. Institutions
and development are mutually endogenous and the most we can hope for is to
identify their reciprocal impacts.&quot;]
	&lt;li&gt;Prietula, Carley and Gasser (eds.), &lt;cite&gt;Simulating
Organizations&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;John E. Roemer, &lt;cite&gt;Political Competition: Theory and
Applications&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a
href=&quot;&quot;http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog/ROEPOL.html&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Steven Rosefielde, &lt;cite&gt;Comparative Economic Systems: Culture,
Wealth, and Power in the 21st Century&lt;/cite&gt; [&quot;Explains how culture, in various
guises, modifies the standard rules of economic engagement, creating systems
that differ markedly from those predicted by the theory of general market
competition.&quot;]
	&lt;li&gt;Michael Rowlinson, &lt;cite&gt;Organisations and Institutions:
Perspectives in Economics and Sociology&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Dietrich Rueschemeyer, &lt;cite&gt;Power and the Division of Labor&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Ekkehart Schlicht, &quot;Social Evolution, Corporate Culture, and
Exploitation&quot;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:iza:izadps:dp651&quot;&gt;online&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Andrei Shleifer and Robert W. Vishny, &lt;cite&gt;The Grabbing Hand:
Government Pathologies and Their Cures&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Herbert Simon, &lt;cite&gt;Administrative Behavior&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sinno.com/&quot;&gt;Abdulkader
H. Sinno&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;cite&gt;Organizations at War in Afghanistan and Beyond&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/cup_detail.taf?ti_id=4778&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sinno.com/book.htm&quot;&gt;author's book description&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Daniel Spulber, &lt;cite&gt;Market Microstructure: Intermediaries and
the Theory of the Firm&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Arthur Stinchcombe, &lt;cite&gt;Information and Organizations&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.escholarship.org/editions/view?docId=ft338nb1zq&quot;&gt;Free
online&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Grahame F. Thompson, &lt;cite&gt;Between Hierarchies and Markets:
The Logic and Limits of Network Forms of Organization&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Joshua R. Tyler, Dennis M. Wilkinson and Bernardo A. Huberman,
&quot;Email as Spectroscopy: Automated Discovery of Community Structure within
Organizations,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0303264&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0303264&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Viktor J. Vanberg, &quot;Rational Choice vs. Program-Based Behavior:
Alternative Theoretical Approaches and Their Relevance for the Study of
Institutions&quot;, &lt;cite&gt;Rationality and Society&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;14&lt;/strong&gt; (2002):
7--54
	&lt;li&gt;Thorstein Veblen
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;&lt;a
href=&quot;http://socserv2.socsci.mcmaster.ca/~econ/ugcm/3ll3/veblen/leisure/&quot;&gt;Theory
of the Leisure Class&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;&lt;a
href=&quot;http://socserv2.socsci.mcmaster.ca/~econ/ugcm/3ll3/veblen/busent/&quot;&gt;Theory
of Business Enterprise&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;&lt;a
href=&quot;http://socserv2.socsci.mcmaster.ca/~econ/ugcm/3ll3/veblen/higher&quot;&gt;Higher
Learning in America&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;Why Is Economics Not an Evolutionary Science?&quot;
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Harrison White, &lt;citE&gt;Markets from Networks: Socioeconomic Models
of Production&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Oliver Williamson
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Markets and Hierarchies&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Mechanisms of Governance&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>