<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- name="generator" content="blosxom/2.0" -->
<!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN" "http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd">

<rss version="0.91">
  <channel>
    <title>Notebooks   </title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks</link>
    <description>Cosma's Notebooks</description>
    <language>en</language>

  <item>
    <title>Interacting Particle Systems</title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks/2009/04/10#interacting-particle-systems</link>
    <description>
&lt;P&gt;In the obvious sense, all of &lt;a href=&quot;stat-mech.html&quot;&gt;statistical
mechanics&lt;/a&gt; is about &quot;interacting particle systems&quot;.  More technically,
however, the name has come to refer to a class
of &lt;a href=&quot;spatial-statistics.html&quot;&gt;spatio-temporal stochastic processes&lt;/a&gt;,
in which time is continuous, space may or may not be discrete, and each spatial
location can be in one of a discrete number of states --- interpreted as the
number or type of particles at that point-instant.  The global configuration
evolves according to a &lt;a href=&quot;markov.html&quot;&gt;Markov process&lt;/a&gt;.  These are
natural generalizations of &lt;a href=&quot;cellular-automata.html&quot;&gt;cellular
automata&lt;/a&gt; to continuous time, which raises some interesting mathematical
issues, and adds a little more realism.

&lt;P&gt;Standard CA update all cells synchronously, but changing this updating
scheme can change the qualitative behavior of a rule considerably.
(&lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/pdf/nlin.CG/0402016&quot;&gt;Fates and Morvan&lt;/a&gt; have a
nice paper on this, with a review of the published literature on the question,
which is a small slice of the unpublished folklore.)  &lt;em&gt;Query&lt;/em&gt;: When
synchronous and asynchronous updating in a discrete-time CA give very different
behaviors, which one matches the continuous-time interacting particle system?
This sounds like a question which could be resolved through the usual
Trotter/Kurtz/etc. machinery for proving that a sequence of Markov processes
converge by manipulating their generators.

&lt;P&gt;Particle filtering from &lt;a href=&quot;filtering.html&quot;&gt;state estimation&lt;/a&gt; goes
here.  The idea in that case is to represent possible hidden states of the
system through a large but finite number of particles, located in the state
space.  In between observations, particles move independently, in accordance
with the dynamics your model assumes on the state space.  When observations are
made, particles get re-sampled, with weights proportional to the likelihood of
getting the current observation from the represented state.  Particles at
different locations (states) thus interact with each other through the
population-averaged likelihood, rather than through the local interactions
typical of physical models.  Many people have noticed that this sounds like
&lt;a href=&quot;evolution.html&quot;&gt;evolution&lt;/a&gt;, or at least
a &lt;a href=&quot;evol-comp.html&quot;&gt;genetic algorithm&lt;/a&gt;....

&lt;P&gt;See also:
	&lt;a href=&quot;cellular-automata.html&quot;&gt;cellular automata&lt;/A&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;ergodic-markov.html&quot;&gt;ergodic theory for Markov processes&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;markov.html&quot;&gt;Markov models&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;noneq-sm.html&quot;&gt;non-equilibrium statistical mechanics&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;pattern-formation.html&quot;&gt;pattern formation&lt;/A&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;filtering.html&quot;&gt;filtering and state estimation&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;Recommended:
	&lt;li&gt;P. Del Moral and L. Miclo, &quot;Branching and Interacting Particle
Systems Approximations of Feynman-Kac Formulae with Applications to Nonlinear
Filtering&quot;, in J. Azema, M. Emery, M. Ledoux and M. Yor
(eds)., &lt;cite&gt;Semainaire de Probabilites XXXIV&lt;/cite&gt; (Springer-Verlag, 2000),
pp. 1--145 [&lt;a href=&quot;http://math1.unice.fr/~delmoral/seminaire.ps&quot;&gt;Postscript
preprint&lt;/a&gt;.  Looks like a trial run for Del Moral's book.]
	&lt;li&gt;Richard Durrett, &lt;cite&gt;Lectures Notes on Particle Systems and
Percolation&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Bert Fristedt and Lawrence Gray, &lt;cite&gt;A Modern Approach to
Probability Theory&lt;/cite&gt; [Contains a good one-chapter account of the basics of
interacting particle systems, but presumes knowledge of measure-theoretic
probability and &lt;a href=&quot;stochastic-processes.html&quot;&gt;stochastic
processes&lt;/a&gt; --- such as you'd get from reading the earlier chapters!]
	&lt;li&gt;David Griffeath, &lt;cite&gt;Additive and Cancellative Interacting
Particle Systems&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;To read:
	&lt;li&gt;E. Andjel, G. Maillard, T.S. Mountford, &quot;A note on 'signed voter
models'&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/0709.3468&quot;&gt;arxiv:0709.3468&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Alexei Andreanov, Giulio Biroli, Jean-Philippe Bouchaud, and
Alexandre Lefevre, &quot;Field theories and exact stochastic equations for
interacting particle
systems&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0602307&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0602307&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Chalee Asavathiratham, &lt;cite&gt;The influence model: a tractable representation for the dynamics of networked Markov chains&lt;/cite&gt; [Ph.D. thesis,
MIT, 2001; &lt;a href=&quot;http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/33546&quot;&gt;online&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Anne-Severine Boudou, Pietro Caputo, Paolo Dai Pra and Gustavo
Posta, &quot;Spectral gap estimates for interacting particle systems via a Bakry &amp;
Emery-type approach&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.PR/0505533&quot;&gt;math.PR/0505533&lt;/a&gt; [&quot;We develop a
general technique, based on the Bakry-Emery approach, to estimate spectral gaps
of a class of Markov operators. We apply this technique to various interacting
particle systems.&quot;]
	&lt;li&gt;Xavier Bressaud and Nicolas Fournier, &quot;On the invariant distribution
of a one-dimensional avalanche
process&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.PR/0703750&quot;&gt;math.PR/0703750&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Nicoletta Cancrini, Fabio Martinelli, Cyril Roberto, Cristina
Toninelli, &quot;Facilitated spin models: recent and new
results&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/0712.1934&quot;&gt;arxiv:0712.1934&lt;/a&gt; [&quot;Due to
the fact that the jumps rates of the Markov process can be zero, the whole
analysis of the long time behavior becomes quite delicate and, until recently,
KCSM have escaped a rigorous analysis&quot;]
	&lt;li&gt;Chan, &lt;cite&gt;From Markov Chains to Non-Equilibrium Particle
Systems&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Leonardo Crochik and Tania Tome, &quot;Entropy production in the
majority-vote model&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.72.057103&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Physical
Review E&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;72&lt;/strong&gt; (2005): 057103&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;D. A. Dawson (ed.), &lt;cit&gt;Measure-Valued Processes, Stochastic
Partial Differential Equations, and Interacting Systems&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.ams.org/bookstore?fn=20&amp;arg1=probability&amp;item=CRMP-5&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Pierre Del Moral
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;Measure-Valued Processes and Interacting Particle
Systems. Application to Nonlinear Filtering Problems&quot;, &lt;cite&gt;The Annals of
Applied Probability&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;8&lt;/strong&gt; (1998): 438--495
[&lt;a
href=&quot;http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=1050-5164%28199805%298%3A2%3C438%3AMPAIPS%3E2.0.CO%3B2-4&quot;&gt;JSTOR&lt;/a&gt;]
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Feynman-Kac Formulae&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Paul Doukhan, Gabriel Lang, Sana Louhichi, Bernard Ycart, &quot;A
functional central limit theorem for interacting particle systems on transitive
graphs&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/0509041&quot;&gt;math-ph/0509041&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Rick Durrett, &lt;cite&gt;&lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.math.cornell.edu/~durrett/survey/survhome.html&quot;&gt;Stochastic
Spatial Models: A Hyper-Tutorial&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Andreas Eibeck and Wolfgang Wagner, &quot;Stochastic Interacting
Particle Systems and Nonlinear Kinetic
Equations&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/aoap/1060202829&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Annals of
Applied Probability&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;13&lt;/strong&gt; (2003): 845--889&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Alison M. Etheridge, &lt;cite&gt;An Introduction to Superprocesses&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ams.org/bookstore?fn=20&amp;arg1=probability&amp;item=ULECT-20&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Joaquin Fontbona, Helene Guerin, Sylvie Meleard, &quot;Measurability of
optimal transportation and convergence rate for Landau type interacting
particle
systems&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.PR/0703432&quot;&gt;math.PR/0703432&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Henryk Fuks and Nino Boccara, &quot;Convergence to equilibrium in a
class of interacting particle systems evolving in discrete time,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/nlin.CG/0101037&quot;&gt;nlin.CG/0101037&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Thierry Gobron and Ellen Saada, &quot;Coupling, Attractiveness and
Hydrodynamics for Conservative Particle Systems&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/0903.0316&quot;&gt;arxiv:0903.0316&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;A. Greven, F. den Hollander, &quot;Phase transitions for the long-time
behaviour of interacting
diffusions&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.PR/0611141&quot;&gt;math.PR/0611141&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Malte Henkel, &quot;Ageing, dynamical scaling and its extensions in
many-particle systems without detailed
balance&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0609672&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0609672&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Vassili N. Kolokoltsov, &quot;Nonlinear Markov Semigroups and
Interacting L&amp;eacute;vy Type
Processes&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10955-006-9211-y&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Journal
of Statistical Physics&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;126&lt;/strong&gt; (2007): 585-642&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Julio Largo, Piero Tartaglia, Francesco Sciortino, &quot;Effective
non-additive pair potential for lock-and-key interacting particles: the role of
the limited
valence&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0703383&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0703383&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Alexandre Lefevre, Giulio Biroli, &quot;Dynamics of interacting particle
systems: stochastic process and field
theory&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/0709.1325&quot;&gt;arxiv:0709.1325&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Thomas M. Liggett
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Interacting Particle Systems&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Stochastic Interacting Systems: Contact, Voter,
and Exclusion Processes&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;E. Locherbach, &quot;Likelihood Ratio Processes for Markovian Particle
Systems with Killing and Jumps&quot;, &lt;cite&gt;Statistical Inference for Stochastic
Processes&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;5&lt;/strong&gt; (2002): 153--177
	&lt;li&gt;Daniel Remenik, &quot;Limit Theorems for Individual-Based Models in
Economics and
Finance&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/0810.2813&quot;&gt;arxiv:0810.2813&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;A. V. Skorohod, &lt;cite&gt;Stochastic Equations for Complex
Systems&lt;/cite&gt; [chapter 2 being &quot;Randomly Interacting Systems of Particles&quot;]
	&lt;li&gt;Anja Sturm and Jan Swart, &quot;Voter models with heterozygosity
selection&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.PR/0701555&quot;&gt;math.PR/0701555&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Biao Wu, &quot;Interacting Agent Feedback Finance Model&quot;,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.PR/0703827&quot;&gt;math.PR/0703827&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>