<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- name="generator" content="blosxom/2.0" -->
<!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN" "http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd">

<rss version="0.91">
  <channel>
    <title>Notebooks   </title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks</link>
    <description>Cosma's Notebooks</description>
    <language>en</language>

  <item>
    <title>Julian Jaynes</title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks/1997/05/05#julian-jaynes</link>
    <description>

An ex-behaviorist psychologist, now best known for writing &lt;cite&gt;The Origin of
Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind&lt;/cite&gt; (1976).  The first
part of this book considers, with no little insight, just what consciousness
is, and as importantly what it isn't; this is highly regarded by many people of
intelligence, such as &lt;a href=&quot;dennett.html&quot;&gt;Daniel Dennett&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;P&gt;The rest of the book is devoted to the rather bizarre theory that, prior to
about 1000 B.C., consciousness did not exist, but rather everyone went around
in a ``bicameral'' condition, hallucinating the voices of the gods and their
parents out of one of their cerebral hemispheres, which gave orders to the
other.  Bicamerality is supposed to have broken down and been supperseded by
consciousness as we know it during the stresses of the late Bronze Age, leaving
behind as remnants things like poetry and fortune-telling.  (Much of Jaynes's
book is devoted to analyzing the heroes in Homer, though, curiously, he does
not take their athletic feats as seriously as their visions, and he seems
totally unacquainted with how epic poetry gets composed.)  This is totally
e.t., and I don't think anyone with their head screwed on tight takes it at all
seriously.  Indeed, the only person I know who believes it also buys into the
paranoid fantasies of Lyndon LaRouche.  (I hasten to add that such a connection
would probably horrify Jaynes, who seems humane and, off this subject, very
level-headed.)

&lt;P&gt;The bicameral hypothesis seems to lack all historical and biological
plausibility, but I think it makes an excellent premise for &lt;a
href=&quot;science-fiction.html&quot;&gt;science fiction&lt;/a&gt;, and one of the better current
authors, Neal Stephenson, has used it in two books --- his first
novel, &lt;cite&gt;The Big U,&lt;/cite&gt; where, under the influence of &lt;a
href=&quot;campus-architecture.html&quot;&gt;campus architecture,&lt;/a&gt; undergraduates revert
to bicamerality, hallucinating messages from fans and flashing neon signs, and
again in &lt;cite&gt;Snow Crash,&lt;/cite&gt;but explaining the connection there would be
too much of a spoiler.  I'm still waiting for bicameral aliens, though.

&lt;ul&gt;To read:
	&lt;li&gt;David Martel Johnson, &lt;cite&gt;How History Made the Mind: The Cultural
Origins of Objective Thinking&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>