<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- name="generator" content="blosxom/2.0" -->
<!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN" "http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd">

<rss version="0.91">
  <channel>
    <title>Notebooks   </title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks</link>
    <description>Cosma's Notebooks</description>
    <language>en</language>

  <item>
    <title>Leszek Kolakowski</title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks/2009/04/10#kolakowski</link>
    <description>
&lt;P&gt;Polish philosopher and historian of philosophy.  He's one of a very small
number of people who is thoroughly conversant with both the analytical and
Continental strains of Western philosophy, and knows the history of their
(common) ancestors as well.  (I know his familiarity with analytical philosophy
comes from having studied under some of the best of the Polish &lt;a
href=&quot;logical-positivism.html&quot;&gt;logical empiricists&lt;/a&gt;; the other traditions
presumably came to him through other professors...)  In the '50s he was one of
the most prominent revisionist Marxists in Poland, and got himself officially
censured by the government after '56.  Sometime between then, and 1968, when
the Polish government forbid him to teach and he went into exile, he stopped
considering himself a Marxist, even a revisionist one (&quot;ultimately, there are
better arguments in favor of democracy and freedom than the fact that Marx is
not quite so hostile to them as he at first appears&quot;), though still a &lt;a
href=&quot;socialism.html&quot;&gt;socialist&lt;/a&gt; and (I think) an atheist.  His first place
of exile was Berkeley, which seems to have been a really horrid shock, as can
be seen from various articles he published around that time about the New Left,
and it's easy to sympathize with his retreat to Oxford.  (Imagine: a
non-Marxist socialist, just expelled from a Soviet satrapy, totally immersed in
European high culture, plopped into Berkeley in the late '60s, and asked to
approve of what the students and soi-disant revolutionaries were up to.  Even
if one has feeling for both parties, it couldn't have been pretty.)

&lt;P&gt;Kolakowski is of interest, not just as an ex-Name (a very useful and pretty
study could be made of the rise and decline of his reputation within the
western &lt;a href=&quot;left.html&quot;&gt;Left&lt;/a&gt; over the last thirty or forty years), but
as a superb historian and thinker.  To steal his own description of Lukacs,
whatever he writes about, he has the subject at his fingers ends, and, what's
more, can make it interesting.  He even pulls off this trick with the arguments
of the Young Hegelians (in &lt;cite&gt;Main Currents of Marxism,&lt;/cite&gt; I) and 17th
century theology (in &lt;cite&gt;God Owes Us Nothing&lt;/cite&gt;), subjects which must at
times have pretty damn dry even to many of the people directly involved.
Kolakowski is nonetheless always able to make clear why people got wrought up
about such things, what the issues involved were, how they thought, why they
thought that way.  His reflections on our current predicament I find less
persuasive, perhaps because they don't agree with mine (though I think his views
of socialism and Marxism are absolutely on-target).  On top of all this, he has
a very surprising vein of humor, which shows up more in his essays than his
full-length books, e.g. &quot;The Epistemology of the Strip-Tease&quot;.

&lt;ul&gt;Recommended:
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Main Currents of Marxism,&lt;/cite&gt; [Originally published in
three volumes, recently reprinted in a one-volume edition with a brief new
preface and afterword.  Mainly concerned with Marxist philosophy and
non-economic theory, down through c. 1970.  The single best work on its
subject.  A review has long been in the process of formation...]
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;positivism.html&quot;&gt;Positivist&lt;/a&gt; Philosophy
from &lt;a href=&quot;hume.html&quot;&gt;Hume&lt;/a&gt; to
the &lt;a href=&quot;logical-positivism.html&quot;&gt;Vienna Circle&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/cite&gt; [First edition
of the translation was published as
&lt;cite&gt;Alienation of Reason&lt;/cite&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Towards a Marxist Humanism&lt;/cite&gt; [A collection of essays
from his revisionist days, published in English in 1968.  The British edition
has a much less deceptive title, &lt;cite&gt;Marxism and Beyond,&lt;/cite&gt; and a useful
preface by Kolakowski explaining why he no longer held some of the views in
those essays.]
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;God Owes Us Nothing: A Brief Remark on Pascal's Religion and
on the Spirit of Jansenism&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Husserl and the Search for Certitude&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Modernity on Endless Trial&lt;/cite&gt; [Another essay collection,
including, as well as some very serious pieces, &quot;&lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.mrbauld.com/conlibsoc.html&quot;&gt;How to Be a
Conservative-Liberal-Socialist&lt;/a&gt;&quot; and &quot;The Theory of Not-Gardening.&quot;  While
we're talking about this book, there's an interesting review of it entitled &quot;&lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.visi.com/~contra_m/cm/reviews/cm01_rev_twilight.html&quot;&gt;Reflections
in the Twilight of Christendom&lt;/a&gt;&quot; from a journal in favor of Calvinist
theocracy.  Kolakowski would probably be amused.]
	&lt;li&gt;&quot;On exile, philosophy &amp;amp; tottering insecurely on the edge of an
unknown abyss&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://mitpress.mit.edu/journals/pdf/DAED_134_3_82.pdf&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Daedalus&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;134:3&lt;/strong&gt;
(Summer 2005): 82--88&lt;/a&gt; [Interview with Danny Postel; thanks to Mr. Postel
for sending this to me]
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Why Is There Something Rather Than Nothing? 23 Questions from
Great Philosophers&lt;/cite&gt; [More exactly, very brief but clear and engaging
summaries of 23 important philosophers, together with some of the questions
suggested by their works.  A fun and stimulating little book, and a nice return
to form after &lt;cite&gt;Freedom, Fear, Lying and Betrayal&lt;/cite&gt; (see below).
Thanks to Basic Books for the review copy.]
	&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;Not recommended:
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Freedom, Fear, Lying and Betrayal: Essays on Everyday
Life&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;../reviews/kolakowski-fflb/&quot;&gt;Review: How Are the Mighty
Fallen&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;To read:
	&lt;li&gt;&quot;The Death of Utopia Reconsidered&quot; [Tanner Lectures, 1982.  &lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.tannerlectures.utah.edu/lectures/kolakowski83.pdf&quot;&gt;PDF,
146k&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;The Leszek Kolakowski Reader&lt;/cite&gt; [special issue of
&lt;cite&gt;TriQuarterly&lt;/cite&gt; from the '60s.  I told you he used to be a Name.]
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Metaphysical Horror&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;The Presence of Myth&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Religion: If There Is No God --- on God, the Devil, Sin, and
Other Worries of the So-Called Philosophy of Religion&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>