<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- name="generator" content="blosxom/2.0" -->
<!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN" "http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd">

<rss version="0.91">
  <channel>
    <title>Notebooks   </title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks</link>
    <description>Cosma's Notebooks</description>
    <language>en</language>

  <item>
    <title>Monte Carlo, and Other Kinds of Stochastic Simulation</title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks/2009/04/10#monte-carlo</link>
    <description>

&lt;P&gt;Monte Carlo is an estimation procedure.  The basic idea is as follows.  You
want to know the average value of some random variable.  You can't work out
what its distribution is, exactly, or you don't want to do integrals
numerically, but you can take samples from that distribution.  (The random
variable may, for instance, be some complicated function of variables with
simple distributions, or they distribution may have a hard-to-compute
normalizing factor [&quot;partition function&quot; in statistical mechanics].)  To
estimate it, you simply take samples, independently, and average them.  If you
take enough samples, then the law of large numbers says your average must be
close to the true value.  The central limit theorem says that your average has
a Gaussian distribution around the true value.

&lt;P&gt;Here's one of the canonical examples.  Say you want to measure the area of a
shape with a complicated, irregular outline.  The Monte Carlo approach is to
draw a square around the shape and measure the square.  Now you throw darts
into the square, as uniformly as possible.  The fraction of darts falling on
the shape gives the ratio of the area of the shape to the area of the square.
Now, in fact, you can cast almost any integral problem, or any averaging
problem, into this form.  So you need a good way to tell if you're inside the
outline, and you need a good way to figure out how many darts you should throw.
Last but not least, you need a good way to throw darts uniformly, i.e., a good
random number generator.  That's a whole separate art I shan't attempt to
describe
(see &lt;a href=&quot;http://cg.scs.carleton.ca/~luc/rnbookindex.html&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;
instead).

&lt;P&gt;Now, in fact, you don't strictly need to sample independently.  You can have
dependence, so long as you end up visiting each point just as many times as you
would with independent samples.  This is useful, since it gives a way to
exploit properties of &lt;a href=&quot;markov.html&quot;&gt;Markov chains&lt;/a&gt; in designing your
sampling strategy, and even of speeding up the convergence of your estimates to
the true averages.  (The classic instance of this is the Metropolis-Hastings
algorithm, which gives you a way of sampling from a distribution where all you
have to know is the &lt;em&gt;ratio&lt;/em&gt; of the probability densities at any two
points.  This is extremely useful when, as in many problems in statistics and
statistical mechanics, the density itself contains a complicated normalizing
factor; it drops out of the ratio.)

&lt;P&gt;Monte Carlo methods originated in physics, where the integrals desired
involved hydrodynamics in complicated geometries with internal heating, i.e.,
&lt;a href=&quot;manhattan-project.html&quot;&gt;designing nukes&lt;/a&gt;.  The statisticans were
surprisingly slow to pick up on it, though by now they have, especially as
&quot;Markov chain Monte Carlo,&quot; abbreviated &quot;MC Monte Carlo&quot; (suggesting an
gambling rapper) or just &quot;MCMC&quot;.  Along the way they picked up the odd idea
that Monte Carlo had something to do with Bayesianism.  In fact it's a general
technique for estimating sample distributions and related quantities, and as
such it's entirely legitimate for frequentists.  Physicists now sometimes use
the term for any kind of stochastic estimation or simulation procedure, though
I think it's properly reserved for estimating integrals and averages.

&lt;P&gt;See also:
	&lt;a href=&quot;markov.html&quot;&gt;Markov Models&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;stat-mech.html&quot;&gt;Statistical Mechanics&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;statistics.html&quot;&gt;Statistics&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;stochastic-approximation.html&quot;&gt;Stochastic Approximation&lt;/a&gt;


&lt;ul&gt;Recommended, big-picture:
	&lt;li&gt;J. M. Hammersley and D. C. Handscomb, &lt;cite&gt;Monte Carlo
Methods&lt;/cite&gt; [Now-classic work from 1964.  Not recommendable for specific
techniques, but still very good as a general orientation.]
	&lt;li&gt;Stephan Mertens and Cris Moore, &lt;cite&gt;The Nature of
Computation&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;em&gt;You&lt;/em&gt; cannot read this yet, but I can assure you
that the material on Monte Carlo here is
superb.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nature-of-computation.org/&quot;&gt;Book site.&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Radford M. Neal, &quot;Probabilistic Inference using Markov Chain Monte
Carlo Methods&quot;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cs.utoronto.ca/~radford/review.abstract.html&quot;&gt;full text in
various formats&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Mark E. J. Newman and G. T. Barkema, &lt;cite&gt;Monte Carlo Methods in
Statistical Physics&lt;/cite&gt; [Excellent, but presumes a pretty strong
background in statistical mechanics]
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nr.com/&quot;&gt;Numerical Recipes&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/cite&gt; [As
usual, &lt;cite&gt;NR&lt;/cite&gt; has a decent explanation, and the source-code they
provide is fine for reasonably simple problems, though for more advanced work
you need to look elsewhere.]
	&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;Recommended, details:
	&lt;li&gt;Roland Assaraf and Michel Caffarel, &quot;Zero-Variance Principle for
Monte Carlo Algorithms,&quot; &lt;cite&gt;Physical Review Letters&lt;/cite&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;83&lt;/strong&gt; (1999): 4682--4685
	&lt;li&gt;Pierre Br&amp;eacute;maud, &lt;cite&gt;Markov Chains: Gibbs Fields,
Monte Carlo Simulation, and Queues&lt;/cite&gt; [As the subtitle indicates,
Monte Carlo is just part of this book...]
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.statslab.cam.ac.uk/~mcmc/&quot;&gt;MCMC Preprint
Service&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;/ul&gt;


&lt;ul&gt;On-line things to look at:
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www-sigproc.eng.cam.ac.uk/smc/&quot;&gt;Sequential Monte
Carlo&lt;/a&gt; a.k.a. particle filtering
	&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;To read:
	&lt;li&gt;Rosalind J. Allen, Patrick B. Warren and Pieter Rein ten Wolde,
&quot;Sampling Rare Switching Events in Biochemical Networks&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/q-bio.MN/0406006&quot;&gt;q-bio.MN/0406006&lt;/a&gt; = &lt;a
href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.018104&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Physical Review
Letters&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;94&lt;/strong&gt; (2005): 018104&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Christophe Andrieu, &amp;Eacute;ric Moulines, &quot;On the ergodicity
properties of some adaptive MCMC
algorithms&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.PR/0610317&quot;&gt;math.PR/0610317&lt;/a&gt;
= &lt;cite&gt;Annals of Applied Probability&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;16&lt;/strong&gt; (2006):
1462--1505
	&lt;li&gt;Andriy Bandrivskyy, S. Beri, D. G. Luchinsky, R. Mannella, and
P. V. E. McClintock, &quot;Fast Monte Carlo simulations and singularities in the
probability distributions of non-equilibrium systems,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/nlin.AO/0212038&quot;&gt;nlin.AO/0212038&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;Li&gt;Bernd A. Berg
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;Generalized Ensemble Simulations for Complex
Systems,&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0110521&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0110521&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;Introduction to Markov Chain Monte Carlo Simulations and
their Statistical Analysis&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0410490&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0410490&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;James A. Bucklew, &quot;Conditional Importance Sampling Estimators&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2004.839490&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;IEEE Transactions on
Information Theory&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;51&lt;/strong&gt; (2005): 143--153&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;James A. Bucklew, Sirin Nitinawarat and Jay Wierer, &quot;Universal
Simulation Distributions&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2004.836875&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;IEEE Transactions on
Information Theory&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;50&lt;/strong&gt; (2004): 2674--2685&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Fabien Campillo and Vivien Rossi, &quot;Parallel and interacting Markov
chains Monte Carlo
method&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.PR/0610181&quot;&gt;math.PR/0610181&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;A. C. Carter, Alan J. Bray and M. A. Moore, &quot;On the Use of
Finite-Size Scaling to Measure Spin-Glass Exponents,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0302207&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0302207&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Fergal P. Casey, Joshua J. Waterfall, Ryan N. Gutenkunst,
Christopher R. Myers, James P. Sethna, &quot;Variational method for estimating the
rate of convergence of Markov Chain Monte Carlo
algorithms&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0609001&quot;&gt;physics/0609001&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Yuguo Chen, &quot;Another look at rejection sampling through importance
sampling&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spl.2005.01.002&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Statistics and
Probability Letters&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;72&lt;/strong&gt; (2005): 277--283&lt;/a&gt; [&quot;We show
that ejection sampling is inferior to the importance sampling algorithm in
terms of the \chi^2 distance between the proposal distribution and the target
distribution...&quot;]
	&lt;li&gt;Andrew M. Childs, Ryan B. Patterson and David J. C. MacKay, &quot;Exact
Sampling from Non-Attractive Distributions Using Summary States,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0005132&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0005132&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;C. I. Chou, Rongsheng Han, S. P. Li and T. K. Leem &quot;Guided
Simulated Annealing Method for Optimization Problems,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0302137&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0302137&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Francis Comets, Roberto Fernandez and Pablo A. Ferrari, &quot;Processes
with Long Memory: Regenerative Construction and Perfect Simulation,&quot;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.PR/0009204&quot;&gt;math.PR/0009204&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Ioana A. Cosma, Masoud Asgharian, &quot;Principle of detailed balance
and convergence assessment of Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods and simulated
annealing&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/0807.3151&quot;&gt;arxiv:0807.3151&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Radu V. Craiu and Xiao-Li Meng, &quot;Multiprocess parallel antithetic
coupling for backward and forward Markov Chain Monte Carlo&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.ST/0505631&quot;&gt;math.ST/0505631&lt;/a&gt; = &lt;a
href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10%2E1214/009053604000001075&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Annals of
Statistics&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;33&lt;/strong&gt; (2005): 661--697&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Keith Crank and James Allen Fill, &quot;Interruptible exact sampling in
the passive case,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.PR/0202136&quot;&gt;math.PR/0202136&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Frederic Dambreville, &quot;Cross-Entropy method: convergence issues for
extended implementation&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.OC/0609461&quot;&gt;math.OC/0609461&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;A. B. Deeker and M. Mandjes, &quot;On asymptotically efficient
simulation of large deviation probabilities&quot;, &lt;cite&gt;Advances in Applied
Probability&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;37&lt;/strong&gt; (2005): 539--552&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;R. Douc and France E. Moulines, &quot;Limit theorems for weighted
samples with applications to Sequential Monte Carlo Methods&quot;,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.ST/0507042&quot;&gt;math.ST/0507042&lt;/a&gt; [With
application to state-space filtering]
	&lt;li&gt;Arnaud Doucet, Nando De Freitas and Neil Gordon (eds.),
&lt;cite&gt;Sequential Monte Carlo Methods in Practice&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Paul Dupuis and Hui Wang, &quot;Dynamic importance sampling for
uniformly recurrent markov chains&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10%2E1214/105051604000001016&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Annals of Applied
Probability&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;15&lt;/strong&gt; (2005): 1--38&lt;/a&gt; = &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.PR/0503454&quot;&gt;math.PR/0503454&lt;/a&gt; [Promises
interesting large deviations techniques in the abstract]
	&lt;li&gt;Tilman Enss, Malte Henkel, Alan Picone and Ulrich Schollw&amp;ouml;ck,
&quot;Ageing phenomena without detailed balance: the contact process&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0406147&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0406147&lt;/a&gt; [Abstract:
&quot;The long-time dynamics of the 1D contact process suddenly brought out of an
uncorrelated initial state is studied through a light-cone transfer-matrix
renormalisation group approach. At criticality, the system undergoes ageing
which is characterised through the dynamical scaling of the two-times
autocorrelation and autoresponse functions. The observed non-equality of the
ageing exponents a and b excludes the possibility of a finite
fluctuation-dissipation ratio in the ageing regime. The scaling form of the
critical autoresponse function is in agreement with the prediction of local
scale-invariance.&quot;  This approach is supposedly an alternative to some kinds of
Monte Carlo]
	&lt;li&gt;Daniel Egloff, &quot;Monte Carlo Algorithms for Optimal Stopping and
Statistical Learning&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.PR/0408276&quot;&gt;math.PR/0408276&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Jean-David Fermanian and Bernard Salani&amp;eacute; &quot;A Nonparametric
Simulated Maximum Likelihood Estimation Method&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0266466604204054&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Econometric
Theory&lt;/citE&gt; &lt;strong&gt;20&lt;/strong&gt; (2004): 701--734&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Pedro J. Fernandez, Pablo A. Ferrari and Sebastian Grynberg,
&quot;Perfectly random sampling of truncated multinormal distributions&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.PR/0505522&quot;&gt;math.PR/0505522&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;James Allen Fill and Mark Huber, &quot;The Randomness Recycler: A New
Technique for Perfect Sampling,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.PR/0009242&quot;&gt;math.PR/0009242&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;James M. Flegal, Murali Haran, Galin L. Jones,
&quot;Markov Chain Monte Carlo: Can We Trust the Third Significant Figure?&quot;,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.ST/0703746&quot;&gt;math.ST/0703746&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;W. R. Gilks et al, &lt;cite&gt;Markov Chain Monte Carlo in
Practice&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Peter Grassberger, &quot;Go with the Winners: a General Monte Carlo
Strategy,&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0201313&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0201313&lt;/a&gt;
= &lt;cite&gt;Computer Physics Communications&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;147&lt;/strong&gt; (2002):
64--70
	&lt;li&gt;Alexander K. Hartmann, &quot;Sampling rare events: statistics of local
sequence alginments,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0108201&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0108201&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;U. D. Jentschura, S. V. Aksenov, P. J. Mohr, M. A. Savageau, and
G. Soff, &quot;Convergence Acceleration Techniques,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.NA/0202009&quot;&gt;math.NA/0202009&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Mark Jerrum, &quot;On the approximation of one Markov chain by
another&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00440-005-0453-4&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Probability Theory and
Related Fields&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;135&lt;/strong&gt; (2006): 1--14&lt;/a&gt; [with special
reference to MCMC]
	&lt;li&gt;S. C. Kou, Qing Zhou and Wing Hung Wong, &quot;Equi-Energy Sampler with
Applications in Statistical Inference and Statistical Mechanics&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.ST/0507080&quot;&gt;math.ST/0507080&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;David Landau and Kurt Binder, &lt;cite&gt;A Guide to Monte Carlo
Simulations in Statistical Physics&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;A. Lecchini-Visintini, J. Lygeros, J. Maciejowski, &quot;Simulated
Annealing: Rigorous finite-time guarantees for optimization on continuous
domains&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/0709.2989&quot;&gt;0709.2989&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Azi Lipshtat, &quot;An 'All Possible Steps' Approach to the Accelerated
Use of Gillespie's Algorithm&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/q-bio.QM/0703048&quot;&gt;q-bio.QM/0703048&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Neal Madras and Dana Randall, &quot;Markov chain decomposition
for convergence rate analysis&quot;, &lt;cite&gt;Annals of Applied Probability&lt;/cite&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;12&lt;/strong&gt; (2002): 581--606
	&lt;li&gt;S. Malefaki and G. Iliopoulos, &quot;On convergence of importance
sampling and other properly weighted samples to the target distribution&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.ST/0505045&quot;&gt;math.ST/0505045&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Paul Marjoram, John Molitor, Vincent Plagnol and Simon
Tavar&amp;eacute;, &quot;Markov chain Monte Carlo without likelihoods&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0306899100&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;PNAS&lt;/cite&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;101&lt;/strong&gt; (2004): 15324--15328&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;J. D. Munoz, M. A. Novotny and S. J. Mitchell, &quot;Rejection-free
Monte Carlo algorithms for models with continuous degrees of
freedom,&quot; &lt;citE&gt;Physical Review E&lt;/citE&gt; &lt;strong&gt;67&lt;/strong&gt; (2003): 026101
	&lt;li&gt;K. P. N. Murthy, &quot;Monte Carlo: Basics,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0104215&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0104215&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Radford M. Neal
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;Slice Sampling,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0009028&quot;&gt;physics/0009028&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;The Short-Cut Metropolis Method&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.ST/0508060&quot;&gt;math.ST/0508060&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;M. A. Novotny, &quot;A Tutorial on Advanced Dynamic Monte Carlo Methods
for Systems with Discrete State Spaces,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arXiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0109182&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0109182&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Christian Robert and George Casella, &lt;cite&gt;Monte Carlo Statistical
Methods&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Gareth O. Roberts and Jeffrey S. Rosenthal, &quot;General state space
Markov chains and MCMC algorithms&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.PR/0404033&quot;&gt;math.PR/0404033&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Sylvain Rubenthaler, Tobias Ryden and Magnus Wiktorsson, &quot;Fast
simulated annealing in $\R^d$ and an application to maximum likelihood
estimation&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.PR/0609353&quot;&gt;math.PR/0609353&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;R. Y. Rubinstein, &quot;A Stochastic Minimum Cross-Entropy Method for
Combinatorial Optimization and Rare-event Estimation&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11009-005-6653-7&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Methodology and
Computing in Applied Probability&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;7&lt;/strong&gt; (2005): 5--50&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Tilman Sauer, &quot;The Feynman Path Goes Monte Carlo,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0107010&quot;&gt;physics/0107010&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Gabriel Stoltz, &quot;Path Sampling with Stochastic Dynamics: Some New
Algorithms&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0607650&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0607650&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;F. V. Tkachov, &quot;Quasi-optimal observables: Attaining the quality
of maximal likelihood in parameter estimation when only a MC event generator is
available,&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/ physics/0108030&quot;&gt;
physics/0108030&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Fugao Wang and David P. Landau, &quot;Determining the density of
states for classical statistical models: A random walk algorithm to produce a
flat histogram,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0107006&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0107006&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Jian-Sheng Wang, &quot;Efficient Monte Carlo Simulation Methods in
Statistical Physics,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0103318&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0103318&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Jian-Sheng Wang and Robert H. Swendsen, &quot;Transition Matrix Monte
Carlo Method,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0104418&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0104418&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Stephen Whitelam and Phillip L. Geissler, &quot;Cluster algorithm for
pairwise-interacting particles&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0508100&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0508100&lt;/a&gt; [with special
application to self-assembling particle systems]
	&lt;li&gt;David H. Wolpert and Chiu Fan Lee, &quot;An adaptive Metropolis-Hastings
scheme: sampling and optimization&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0504163&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0504163&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>