<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- name="generator" content="blosxom/2.0" -->
<!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN" "http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd">

<rss version="0.91">
  <channel>
    <title>Notebooks   </title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks</link>
    <description>Cosma's Notebooks</description>
    <language>en</language>

  <item>
    <title>Analysis of Network Data</title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks/2010/01/26#network-data-analysis</link>
    <description>
&lt;P&gt;That is, of data on the form of networks --- I don't (as such) care about
packet flow or other aspects of computer networks...
	

&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;community-discovery.html&quot;&gt;Community discovery&lt;/a&gt; is an
important sub-topic.

&lt;P&gt;See also:
	&lt;a href=&quot;complex-networks.html&quot;&gt;Complex networks&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;social-networks.html&quot;&gt;Social networks&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;statistics.html&quot;&gt;Statistics&lt;/a&gt; in general;
	&lt;a href=&quot;structured-data.html&quot;&gt;Statistics of structured
data&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;Recommended, big picture:
	&lt;li&gt;Edo Airoldi, David M. Blei, Stephen E. Fienberg, Anna Goldenberg,
Eric P. Xing and Alice X. Zheng (eds.), &lt;cite&gt;Statistical Network Analysis:
Models, Issues, and New Directions&lt;/cite&gt; [Disclaimer:
contains &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/q-bio.NC/0609008&quot;&gt;one of my papers&lt;/a&gt;.]
	&lt;li&gt;Peter J. Carrington, John Scott and Stanley Wasserman (eds.),
&lt;cite&gt;Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis&lt;/cite&gt; [Best thought-of as
a supplement to Wasserman and
Faust.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/0521600979&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Anna Goldenberg, Alice X. Zheng, Stephen E. Fienberg, Edoardo M. Airoldi, &quot;A survey of statistical network models&quot;, &lt;citE&gt;Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning&lt;cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;2&lt;/strong&gt; (2009): 1--117 = &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/0912.5410&quot;&gt;arxiv:0912.5410&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Steven M. Goodreau, James A. Kitts and Martina Morris,
&quot;Birds of a Feather, Or Friend of a Friend?: Using Exponential Random Graph Models to Investigate Adolescent Social Networks&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/dem.0.0045&quot;&gt;&lt;citE&gt;Demography&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;46&lt;/strong&gt; (2009): 103--125&lt;/a&gt; [In addition to the
substantive findings, this is a great introduction to the &quot;exponential-family random graph model&quot; (ERGM) approach to modeling complex networks.]
	&lt;li&gt;Mark S. Handcock, David R. Hunter, Carter T. Butts,
Steven M. Goodreau, and Martina Morris (eds.), &quot;Statistical Modeling
of Social Networks with 'statnet'&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jstatsoft.org/v24&quot;&gt;special volume (24)&lt;/a&gt; of the &lt;cite&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jstatsoft.org/&quot;&gt;Journal
of Statistical Software&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/cite&gt; (2008) [Introduction to a whole issue on
the ERGM approach]
	&lt;li&gt;John Scott, &lt;cite&gt;Social Network Analysis: A Handbook&lt;/cite&gt; [Short
introductory text.  Good, but heavy on the sociology and light on the math.]
	&lt;li&gt;S. Wasserman and K. Faust, &lt;cite&gt;Social Network Analysis&lt;/cite&gt;
[Deservedly, the Bible of the field.  (And much of it is just as detailed, and
just as boring, as the begats and the ritual prescriptions.)]
	&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;Recommended, close-ups:
	&lt;li&gt;Edoardo M. Airoldi, David M. Blei, Stephen E. Fienberg, Eric
P. Xing, &quot;Mixed Membership Stochastic
Blockmodels&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://jmlr.csail.mit.edu/papers/v9/airoldi08a.html&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Journal of
Machine Learning Research&lt;/citE&gt; &lt;strong&gt;9&lt;/strong&gt; (2008): 1981--2014&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Aris Anagnostopoulos, Ravi Kumar and Mohammad Mahdian, &quot;Influence
and Correlation in Social Networks&quot;, in &lt;cite&gt;KDD 2008&lt;/cite&gt; [Thanks
to Dr. Madian for a preprint]
	&lt;li&gt;Aaron Clauset and Cristopher Moore, &quot;Accuracy and Scaling Phenomena
in Internet
Mapping&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0410059&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0410059&lt;/a&gt;
= &lt;citE&gt;Physical Review Letters&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;94&lt;/strong&gt; (2005): 018701
	&lt;li&gt;Aaron Clauset, Cristopher Moore and M. E. J. Newman, &quot;Structural
Inference of Hierarchies in
Networks&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0610051&quot;&gt;physics/0610051&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Linton C. Freeman and Douglas R. White (2003), &quot;Using Galois
Lattices to Represent Network Data&quot;, &lt;cite&gt;Sociological Methodology&lt;/cite&gt; 23:
127--146 [&lt;a href=&quot;http://eclectic.ss.uci.edu/~drwhite/pw/Galois.pdf&quot;&gt;PDF
reprint&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Diego Garlaschelli and Maria I. Loffredo, &quot;Maximum likelihood:
extracting unbiased information from complex
networks&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0609015&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0609015&lt;/a&gt;
[This is a much-needed corrective to the physics literature, but it makes it
sound as though exponential families of random graphs were invented in 2004,
and they're the first ones to apply maximum likelihood to network analysis.
I'm sure, however, that these are inadvertent lapses.  Definitely worth reading
as a first glimpse of how to do parameter estimation &lt;em&gt;correctly&lt;/em&gt;.
Thanks to Dave Feldman for pointing it out to me.]
	&lt;li&gt;Krista Gile and Mark S. Handcock, &quot;Model-based Assessment of the
Impact of Missing Data on Inference for Networks&quot; [Working Paper 66, Center for
Statistics and the Social Sciences, University of Washington
(2006).  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.csss.washington.edu/Papers/wp66.pdf&quot;&gt;PDF
preprint&lt;/a&gt;.]
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~shanneke/&quot;&gt;Steve Hanneke&lt;/a&gt;
and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~epxing/&quot;&gt;Eric Xing&lt;/a&gt;, &quot;Discrete Temporal
Models for Social Networks&quot;, in Airoldi et al. (eds.) above [Extending
exponential-family random graph models to dynamic networks.  A very cool paper,
making me extra proud to have taught
Steve &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~cshalizi/754/&quot;&gt;stochastic
processes&lt;/a&gt;.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://nlg.cs.cmu.edu/icml_sna/paper14_final.pdf&quot;&gt;PDF
preprint&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stat.washington.edu/hoff/&quot;&gt;Peter D. Hoff&lt;/a&gt;,
Adrian E. Raftery and Mark S. Handcock, &quot;Latent Space Approaches to Social
Network Analysis&quot;, &lt;cite&gt;Journal of the American Statistical
Association&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;97&lt;/strong&gt; (2002): 1090--1098
[&lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.stat.washington.edu/www/research/reports/2001/tr399.pdf&quot;&gt;PDF
preprint&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stat.psu.edu/%7Edhunter/&quot;&gt;David R. Hunter&lt;/a&gt;,
Steven M. Goodreau and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stat.washington.edu/~handcock/&quot;&gt;Mark
S. Handcock&lt;/a&gt;, &quot;Goodness of Fit of Social Network Models&quot;, &lt;cite&gt;Journal of
the American Statistical Association&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;103&lt;/strong&gt; (2008):
248--258
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stat.psu.edu/%7Edhunter/papers/tr0502.pdf&quot;&gt;PDF&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stat.psu.edu/%7Edhunter/&quot;&gt;David R. Hunter&lt;/a&gt;
and Mark S. Handcock, &quot;Inference in curved exponential family models for
networks&quot;, &lt;cite&gt;Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics&lt;/cite&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;15&lt;/strong&gt; (2006): 565--583
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stat.psu.edu/%7Edhunter/papers/cef.pdf&quot;&gt;PDF preprint&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Roger Th. A. J. Leenders
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Structure and Influence:
Statistical Models for the Dynamics of Actor Attributes, Network Structure and
Their Interdependence&lt;/cite&gt; [Review forthcoming]
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;Modeling social influence through network autocorrelation:
constructing the weight
matrix&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8733(01)00049-&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Social
Networks&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;24&lt;/strong&gt; (2002): 21--47&lt;/a&gt; [Basically, part of
chapter 3 of his &lt;cite&gt;Structure and Influence&lt;/cite&gt; --- mostly section
3.3.  &lt;a
href=&quot;http://som.eldoc.ub.rug.nl/FILES/reports/themeB/2002/02B09/02B09.pdf&quot;&gt;PDF
preprint&lt;/a&gt;]
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Manul Middendorf, Etay Ziv and Chris Wiggins, &quot;Inferring Network
Mechanisms: The &lt;em&gt;Drosophila melanogaster&lt;/em&gt; Protein Interaction
Network&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/q-bio.QM/0408010&quot;&gt;q-bio.QM/0408010&lt;/a&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;learning-inference-induction.html&quot;&gt;Machine learning&lt;/a&gt; meets complex
networks: specifically, learning decision trees to accurately classify networks
by the process which grew them.  Neat.]
	&lt;li&gt;M. E. J. Newman, Steven H. Strogatz and Duncan J. Watts,
&quot;Random graphs with arbitrary degree distributions and their applications&quot;,
&lt;cite&gt;Physical Review E&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;64&lt;/strong&gt; (2001): 026118
= &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0007235&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0007235&lt;/a&gt;
[Though they don't quite put it this way, these methods are very naturally
employed to generate surrogate network data, which keeps the degree distribution
of the original but is otherwise randomized.]
	&lt;li&gt;J&amp;ouml;rg Reichardt and Douglas R. White, &quot;Role models for complex
networks&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/0708.0958&quot;&gt;arxiv:0708.0958&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Garry Robins, Tom Snijders, Peng Wang, Mark Handcock and Philippa
Pattison, &quot;Recent developments in exponential randomm graph (p*) models for
social networks&quot;, &lt;cite&gt;Social Networks&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;29&lt;/strong&gt; (2007):
192--215
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~snijders/RobinsSnijdersWangHandcockPattison.pdf&quot;&gt;PDF
reprint&lt;/a&gt; via Prof. Snijders&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Purnamrita Sarkar and Andrew W. Moore, &quot;Dynamic Social Network
Analysis using Latent Space Models&quot;, forthcoming in &lt;cite&gt;Advances in Neural
Information Processing Systems 18 (NIPS 2005)&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.autonlab.org/autonweb/papers/y2005/15970.html&quot;&gt;Abstract,
link to PDF&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Carsten Wiuf, Markus Brameier, Oskar Hagberg and Michael P. H.
Stumpf, &quot;A likelihood approach to analysis of network
data&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0600061103&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Proceedings of
the National Academy of Sciences&lt;/cite&gt; (USA) &lt;strong&gt;103&lt;/strong&gt; (2006):
7566--7570&lt;/a&gt;  [&lt;a href=&quot;../weblog/466.html&quot;&gt;My comments&lt;/a&gt;.  Shorter: A nice
piece of work, though limited to what they call &quot;duplication attachment&quot;
models, a limitation which is not really made clear by the abstract.]
	&lt;li&gt;Douglas R. White and Vincent Duquenne, eds. (1996), special issue
on &quot;Social Network and Discrete Structure Analysis&quot;, &lt;cite&gt;Social
Networks&lt;/cite&gt; 18: 169--318
	&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;To read:
	&lt;li&gt;Alexandre H. Abdo and A. P. S. de Moura, &quot;Clustering as a measure
of the local topology of
networks&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0605235&quot;&gt;physics/0605235&lt;/a&gt;
[&quot;... clustering coefficient ... insufficient [for] describing the local
topology of very simple networks. ... an extension, the clustering
profile. We show, both conceptually and through applications to well studied
networks, that this measure is a more complete and robust measure of
clustering. It imposes stringent constraints on theoretical growth models,
specially on aspects of the network structure that play a central role in
dynamics on networks. ... richer perspective [on] hierarchy, small-worlds and
clusterization.&quot;]
	&lt;li&gt;Pierre Baldi et al., &lt;citE&gt;Modeling the Internet and the Web:
Probabilistic Methods and Algorithms&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Kim Baskerville and Maya Paczuski, &quot;Subgraph ensembles and motif
discovery using an alternative heuristic for graph
isomorphism&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.74.051903&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Physical Review
E&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;74&lt;/strong&gt; (2006): 051903&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Etienne Birmele, &quot;Detection of network motifs by local concentration&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/0904.0365&quot;&gt;arxiv:0904.0365&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Stephen P. Borgatti, Kathleen M. Carley and David Krackhardt,
&quot;On the robustness of centrality measures under conditions of imperfect data&quot;,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2005.05.001&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Social
Networks&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;28&lt;/strong&gt; (2006): 124--136&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Andrea Capocci, G. Caldarelli and P. De Los Rios, &quot;Quantitative
description and modeling of real networks,&quot;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0206336&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0206336&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Vittoria Colizza, Alessandro Flammini, M. Angeles Serrano,
Alessandro Vespignani, &quot;Detecting rich-club ordering in complex
network&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0602134&quot;&gt;physics/0602134&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Luciano da F. Costa, Francisco A. Rodrigues, Gonzalo Travieso and
P. R. Villas Boas, &quot;Characterization of complex networks: A survey of
measurements&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0505185&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0505185&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Stephen E. Fienberg, Alessandro Rinaldo and Yi Zhou, &quot;On the
Geometry of Discrete Exponential Families with Applications to Exponential
Random Graph
Models&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/0901.0026&quot;&gt;arxiv:0901.0026&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Jacob G. Foster, David V. Foster, Peter Grassberger and Maya
Paczuski, &quot;Link likelihoods in random networks with fixed and partially fixed
degree
sequence&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0610446&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0610446&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Roger Guimera and Marta Sales-Pardo, &quot;Missing and spurious
interactions and the reconstruction of complex networks&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0908366106&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences&lt;/cite&gt; (USA) &lt;strong&gt;106&lt;/strong&gt; (2009): 22073--22078&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Mark S. Handcock, &quot;Assessing degenarcy in statistical models
of social networks&quot;, CSSS working paper 39 (2003)
	&lt;li&gt;Robert A. Hanneman and Mark Riddle, &lt;cite&gt;Introduction to Social
Network Methods&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/nettext/&quot;&gt;Online textbook&lt;/a&gt;, looks
good.]
	&lt;li&gt;Petter Holme, &quot;Local symmetries in complex networks&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0608695&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0608695&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Rui Jiang, Zhidong Tu, Ting Chen and Fengzhu Sun, &quot;Network motif identification in stochastic networks&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507841103&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences&lt;/cite&gt; (USA) &lt;strong&gt;103&lt;/strong&gt; (2006): 9404--9409&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Eric D. Kolaczyk, &lt;cite&gt;Statistical Analysis of Network Data:
Methods and Models&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.springer.com/statistics/statistical+theory+and+methods/book/978-0-387-88145-4&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;.
I'm reading this now and liking it.]
	&lt;li&gt;Eric D. Kolaczyk, David B. Chua, Marc Barthelemy, &quot;Co-Betweenness:
A Pairwise Notion of
Centrality&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/0709.3420&quot;&gt;arxiv:0709.3420&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Gueorgi Kossinets and Duncan J. Watts
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;Empirical Analysis of an
Evolving Social Network&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1116869&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Science&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;311&lt;/strong&gt;
(2006): 88--90&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;Recovery and analysis of social networks from
discrete interactions&quot; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://cdg.columbia.edu/uploads/papers/kossinets2006_recovery.pdf&quot;&gt;PDF preprint&lt;/a&gt;]
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Vassilis Kostakos, Eamonn O'Neill, Alan Penn, &quot;Brief encounter
networks&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/0709.0223&quot;&gt;0709.0223&lt;/a&gt; [Networks
defined by brief transactions, rather than persistent ties.]
	&lt;li&gt;Mark A. Kramer, Uri T. Eden, Sydney S. Cash, Eric D. Kolaczyk,
&quot;Network inference - with confidence - from multivariate time series&quot;,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/0903.2210&quot;&gt;arxiv:0903.2210&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Matthieu Latapy and Clemence Magnien, &quot;Measuring Fundamental
Properties of Real-World Complex Networks&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.NI/0609115&quot;&gt;cs.NI/0609115&lt;/a&gt; [How
asymptotic are we?]
	&lt;li&gt;Sang Hoon Lee, Pan-Jun Kim, and Hawoong Jeong, &quot;Statistical
properties of sampled
networks&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0505232&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0505232&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;David Lusseau, Hal Whitehead, Shane Gero, &quot;Incorporating uncertainty into the study of animal social networks&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/0903.1519&quot;&gt;arxiv:0903.1519&lt;/a&gt; [From a quick look, nothing in this depends on
&lt;em&gt;animals&lt;/em&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Yoshiharu Maeno, Yukio Ohsawa, &quot;Node discovery problem for a social
network&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/0710.4975&quot;&gt;arxiv:0710.4975&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Philippa Pattison, &lt;cite&gt;Algebraic Models for Social
Networks&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a
href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/0521365686&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Leonid Peshkin, &quot;Structure induction by lossless graph compression&quot;,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.DS/0703132&quot;&gt;cs.DS/0703132&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Art F. Y. Poon, Kimberly C. Brouwer, Stefannie A.  Strathdee,
Michelle Firestone-Cruz, Remedios M. Lozada, Sergei L. Kosakovsky Pond, Douglas
D. Heckathorn, Simon D. W. Frost, &quot;Parsing Social Network Survey Data from
Hidden Populations Using Stochastic Context-Free
Grammars&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006777&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;PLoS
One&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;4&lt;/strong&gt; (2009): 6777&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Camille Roth, &quot;Measuring Generalized Preferential Attachment in
Dynamic Social Networks&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/nlin.AO/0507021&quot;&gt;nlin.AO/0507021&lt;/a&gt; [Applies
more generally than to social networks]
	&lt;li&gt;M. Angeles Serrano, Marian Boguna, Romualdo Pastor-Satorras,
&quot;Correlations in weighted
networks&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0609029&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0609029&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;T. A. B. Snijders, &quot;Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation of
exponential random graph models&quot;, &lt;cite&gt;Journal of Social Structure&lt;/cite&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;2&lt;/strong&gt; (2002)
	&lt;li&gt;Michael P. H. Stumpf, P. J. Ingram, I. Nouvel and Carsten Wiuf,
&quot;Statistical model selection methods applied to biological
networks&quot;, &lt;cite&gt;Transactions in Computational Systems
Biology&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;forthcoming&lt;/strong&gt; (2005) = &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/q-bio.MN/0506013&quot;&gt;q-bio.MN/0506013&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Michael P. H. Stumpf and Carsten Wiuf, &quot;Sampling properties of
random graphs: the degree
distribution&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-math/0507345&quot;&gt;cond-math/0507345&lt;/a&gt;
= &lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.72.036118&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Physical Review
E&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;72&lt;/strong&gt; (2005): 036118&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Michael P. H. Stumpf, Carsten Wiuf and Robert M. May, &quot;Subnets of
scale-free networks are not scale-free: Sampling properties of networks&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0501179102&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;PNAS&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;102&lt;/strong&gt;
(2005): 4221--4224&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Andrew Thomas, &lt;cite&gt;Hierarchical Models for Relational Data&lt;/cite&gt;
[Ph.D. thesis, Harvard statistics dept.,
2009; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/%7Eacthomas/papers/act-dissert.pdf&quot;&gt;PDF&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Fabien Viger, Alain Barrat, Luca Dall'Asta, Cun-Hui Zhang, Eric
D. Kolaczyk, &quot;Network Inference from TraceRoute Measurements: Internet Topology
`Species'&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.NI/0510007&quot;&gt;cs.NI/0510007&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Sebastian Weber, Markus Porto, &quot;Generation of arbitrarily two-point
correlated random
networks&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/0708.4161&quot;&gt;arxiv:0708.4161&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Hal Whitehead, &lt;cite&gt;Analyzing Animal Societies: Quantitative Methods for Vertebrate Social Analysis&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.press.uchicago.edu/presssite/metadata.epl?mode=synopsis&amp;bookkey=254497&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;To write:
	&lt;li&gt;CRS, &quot;Homophily, Contagion, Confounding: Pick Any Three&quot;
	&lt;li&gt;CRS, &quot;Indirect Inference of Network Growth Models&quot;
	&lt;li&gt;CRS and Shawn Mankad, &quot;Statistical Properties of Aggregated
Random Graphs&quot;
	&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>