<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- name="generator" content="blosxom/2.0" -->
<!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN" "http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd">

<rss version="0.91">
  <channel>
    <title>Notebooks   </title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks</link>
    <description>Cosma's Notebooks</description>
    <language>en</language>

  <item>
    <title>Neural Nets, Connectionism, Perceptrons, etc.</title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks/2009/04/10#neural-nets</link>
    <description>
I'm mostly interested in them as a means of &lt;a
href=&quot;learning-inference-induction.html&quot;&gt;machine learning or statistical
inference&lt;/a&gt;.  I am particularly interested in their role as models of &lt;a
href=&quot;chaos.html&quot;&gt;dynamical systems&lt;/a&gt; (via recurrent nets, generally), and as
models of &lt;a href=&quot;transducers.html&quot;&gt;transduction&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;P&gt;I need to understand better how the analogy to spin glasses works, but then,
I need to understand spin glasses better too.

&lt;P&gt;The arguments that connectionist models are superior, for purposes
of &lt;a href=&quot;cognitive-science.html&quot;&gt;cognitive science&lt;/a&gt;, to more &quot;symbolic&quot;
ones I find unconvincing.  (Saying that they're more biologically realistic is
like saying that cars are better models of animal locomotion than bicycles,
because cars have four appendages in contact with the ground and not two.)
This is not to say, of course, that some connectionist models of cognition
aren't interesting, insightful and valid; but the same is true of many symbolic
models, and there seems no compelling reason for abandoning the latter in favor
of the former.  (For more on this point, see Marcus, and my forthcoming review
of his book.)  --- &lt;em&gt;Of course&lt;/em&gt; a cognitive model which cannot be
implemented in real brains must be rejected; connecting neurobiology to
cognition can hardly be too ardently desired.  The point is that the elements
in connectionist models called &quot;neurons&quot; bear only the sketchiest resemblance
to the real thing, and neural nets are no more than caricatures of real
neuronal circuits.  Sometimes sketchy resemblances and caricatures are enough
to help us learn, which is why Hebb, McCulloch and &lt;cite&gt;Neural
Computation&lt;/cite&gt; are important for both connectionism and neurobiology.

&lt;ul&gt;Recommended (big picture):
	&lt;li&gt;Larry Abbot and Terrence Sejnowski (eds.), &lt;cite&gt;Neural Codes and
Distributed Representations&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Michael A. Arbib, &lt;cite&gt;Brains, Machines and Mathematics&lt;/cite&gt;
[1964; a model of clarity in exposition and thought]
	&lt;li&gt;Michael A. Arbib (ed.), &lt;cite&gt;The Handbook of Brain Theory and
Neural Networks&lt;/citE&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Dana Ballard, &lt;cite&gt;An Introduction to Natural Computation&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;../reviews/ballard-natural/&quot;&gt;Review: Not Natural Enough&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;M. J. Barber, J. W. Clark and C. H. Anderson, &quot;Neural
Representation of Probabilistic Information,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0108425&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0108425&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Maureen Caudill and Charles Butler, &lt;cite&gt;Naturally Intelligent
Systems&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Patricia Churchland and Terrence Sejnowski, &lt;cite&gt;The Computational
Brain&lt;/citE&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Chris Eliasmith and Charles Anderson, &lt;cite&gt;Neural Engineering:
Computation, Representation, and Dynamics in Neurobiological Systems&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Donald O. Hebb, &lt;Cite&gt;The Organization of Behavior: A
Neuropsychological Theory&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Hinton and Sejnowski (eds.), &lt;cite&gt;Unsupervised Learning&lt;/cite&gt; [A
sort of &quot;&lt;cite&gt;Neural Computation&lt;/cite&gt;'s Greatest Hits&quot; compilation]
	&lt;li&gt;Gary F. Marcus, &lt;cite&gt;The Algebraic Mind: Integrating Connectionism
and Cognitive Science&lt;/cite&gt; [On the limits of the connectionist approach to
cognition, with special reference to &lt;a href=&quot;linguistics.html&quot;&gt;language and
grammar&lt;/a&gt;.]
	&lt;li&gt;Warren S. McCulloch, &lt;cite&gt;Embodiments of Mind&lt;/citE&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Brian Ripley, &lt;cite&gt;Pattern Recognition and Neural Networks&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;V. N. (=Vladimir Naumovich) Vapnik, &lt;cite&gt;The Nature of Statistical
Learning Theory&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;../reviews/vapnik-nature/&quot;&gt;Review: A Useful
Biased Estimator&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;T. L. H Watkin, A. Rau and M. Biehl, &quot;The Statistical Mechanics of
Learning a Rule,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://link.aps.org/abstract/RMP/v65/p499&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Reviews of Modern
Physics&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;65&lt;/strong&gt; (1993): 499--556&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Achilleas Zapranis and Apostolos-Paul Refenes, &lt;cite&gt;Principles of
Neural Model Identification, Selection and Adequacy, with Applications to
Financial Econometrics&lt;/cite&gt; [Their English is less than perfect, but they've
got very sound ideas about all the important topics]
	&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;Recommended (close-ups; very misc. and small):
	&lt;li&gt;M. J. Barber, J. W. Clark and C. H. Anderson, &quot;Neural Representation of Probabilistic Information&quot;, &lt;cite&gt;Neural Computation&lt;/cite&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;15&lt;/strong&gt; (2003): 1843--1864 = &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0108425&quot;&gt;arxiv:cond-mat/0108425&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Suzanna Becker, &quot;Unsupervised Learning Procedures for Neural Networks&quot;, &lt;cite&gt;International Journal of Neural Systems&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;2&lt;/strong&gt;
(1991): 17--33
	&lt;li&gt;Surya Ganguli, Dongsung Huh and Haim Sompolinsky, &quot;Memory
traces in dynamical systems&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0804451105&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Proceedings of the National Academy
of Sciences&lt;/cite&gt; (USA) &lt;strong&gt;105&lt;/strong&gt; (2008): 18970--18975&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Anders Krogh and Jesper Vedelsby, &quot;Neural Network Ensembles, Cross Validation, and Active Learning&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://books.nips.cc/papers/files/nips07/0231.pdf&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;NIPS 7&lt;/cite&gt; (1994): 231--238&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Mathukumalli Vidyasagar, &lt;cite&gt;A Theory of Learning and
Generalization: With Applications to Neural Networks and Control Systems&lt;/cite&gt;
[Extensive discussion of the application
of &lt;a href=&quot;learning-theory.html&quot;&gt;statistical learning theory&lt;/a&gt; to neural
networks, along with the purely computational difficulties.  &lt;a href=&quot;../weblog/algae-209-01.html#vidyasagar&quot;&gt;Mini-review&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;To read [with abundant thanks to Osame Kinouchi for recommendations]:
	&lt;li&gt;Daniel Amit, &lt;citE&gt;Modelling Brain Function&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;V. M. Becerra, F. R. Garces, S. J. Nasuto and W. Holderbaum, &quot;An
Efficient Parameterization of Dynamic Neural Networks for Nonlinear System
Identification&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TNN.2005.849844&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;IEEE
Transactions on Neural Networks&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;16&lt;/strong&gt; (2005): 983--988&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;William Bechtel and Adele Abrahamsen, &lt;cite&gt;Connectionism
and the Mind: Parallel Processing, Dynamics, and Evolution
in Networks&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;William Bechtel and Robert C. Richardson, &lt;cite&gt;Discovering
Complexity: Decomposition and Localization as Strategies in Scientific
Research&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;A href=&quot;http://pup.princeton.edu/titles/4971.html&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://yuggoth.ces.cwru.edu/beer/beer.html&quot;&gt;Randall
Beer&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;cite&gt;Intelligence as Adaptive Behavior: An Experiment in
Computational Neuroethology&lt;/cite&gt; [Simulated bugs!]
	&lt;li&gt;Hugues Berry and Mathias Quoy, &quot;Structure and Dynamics of Random
Recurrent Neural Networks&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/105971230601400204&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Adaptive
Behavior&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;14&lt;/strong&gt; (2006): 129--137&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Dimitri P. Bertsekas and John N. Tsitsiklis, &lt;cite&gt;Neuro-Dynammic
Programming&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Michael Biehl, Reimer K&amp;uuml;hn, Ion-Olimpiu Stamatescu, &quot;Learning
structured data from unspecific reinforcement,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0001405&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0001405&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;D. Boll&amp;eacute; and P. Kozlowski, &quot;On-line learning and
generalisation in coupled perceptrons,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0111493&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0111493&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Christoph Bunzmann, Michael Biehl, and Robert Urbanczik, &quot;Efficient
training of multilayer perceptrons using principal component analysis&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.72.026117&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Physical Review
E&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;72&lt;/strong&gt; (2005): 026117&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Gail A. Carpenter and Stephen Grossberg (eds.), &lt;cite&gt;Pattern
Recognition by Self-Organizing Neural Networks&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Nestor Caticha and Osame Kinouchi, &quot;Time ordering in the evolution
of information processing and modulation systems,&quot; &lt;cite&gt;Philosophical
Magazine B&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;77&lt;/strong&gt; (1998): 1565--1574
	&lt;li&gt;A. C. C. Coolen, &quot;Statistical Mechanics of Recurrent Neural
Networks&quot;: part I, &quot;Statics,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0006010&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0006010&lt;/a&gt; and part II,
&quot;Dynamics,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0006011&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0006011&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;A. C. C. Coolen, R. Kuehn, and P. Sollich, &lt;cite&gt;Theory of Neural
Information Processing Systems&lt;/cite&gt; [Seems, despite the title, to be
exclusively concerned with artificial neural networks, not with more
biologically-plausible models.  &lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.oup.co.uk/isbn/0-19-853024-2?WT.mc_id=SCIENCENEWS&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;A. C. C. Coolen and D. Saad, &quot;Dynamics of Learning with Restricted
Training Sets,&quot; &lt;citE&gt;Physical Review E&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;62&lt;/strong&gt; (2000):
5444--5487
	&lt;li&gt;Mauro Copelli, Antonio C. Roque, Rodrigo F. Oliveira and Osame
Kinouchi, &quot;Enhanced dynamic range in a sensory network of excitable
elements,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0112395&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0112395&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Valeria Del Prete and Alessandro Treves, &quot;A theoretical model of
neuronal population coding of stimuli with both continuous and discrete
dimensions,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0103286&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0103286&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;M. C. P. deSouto, T. B. Ludermir and W. R. deOliveira, &quot;Equivalence
Between RAM-Based Neural Networks and Probabilistic Automata&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TNN.2005.849838&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;IEEE Transactions on
Neural Networks&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;16&lt;/strong&gt; (2005): 996--999&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Eytan Domany, Jan Leonard van Hemmen and Klaus Schulten (eds.),
&lt;cite&gt;Models of Neural Networks III: Association, Generalization, and
Representation&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Viktor Dotsenko, &lt;cite&gt;Introduction to the Theory of Spin Glasses
and Neural Networks&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Liat Ein-Dor and Ido Kanter, &quot;Confidence in prediction by neural
networks,&quot; &lt;cite&gt;Physical Review E&lt;/citE&gt; &lt;strong&gt;60&lt;/strong&gt; (1999): 799--802
	&lt;li&gt;Chris Eliasmith, &quot;A Unified Approach to Building and Controlling
Spiking Attractor Networks&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://neco.mitpress.org/cgi/content/abstract/17/6/1276&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Neural
Computation&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;17&lt;/strong&gt; (2005): 1276--1314&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Elman et al., &lt;cite&gt;Rethinking Innateness&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Frank Emmert-Streib
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;Self-organized annealing in laterally
inhibited neural networks shows power law decay&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0401633&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0401633&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;A Heterosynaptic Learning Rule for Neural Networks&quot;,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0608564&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0608564&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Andreas Engel and Christian P. L. Van den Broeck, &lt;Cite&gt;Statistical
Mechanics of Learning&lt;/citE&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Magnus Enquist and Stefano Ghirlanda, &lt;cite&gt;Neural Networks and
Animal Behavior&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://pup.princeton.edu/titles/8107.html&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Michael Feindt, &quot;A Neural Bayesian Estimator for Conditional
Probability Densities&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0402093&quot;&gt;physics/0402093&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Gary William Flake, &quot;The Calculus of Jacobian Adaptation&quot; [Not
confined to neural nets]
	&lt;li&gt;Leonardo Franco, &quot;A measure for the complexity of Boolean
functions related to their implementation in neural networks,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0111169&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0111169&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;J&amp;uuml;rgen Franke and Michael H. Neumann, &quot;Bootstrapping Neural
Networks,&quot; &lt;cite&gt;Neural Computation&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;12&lt;/strong&gt; (2000):
1929--19949
	&lt;li&gt;Gardenfors, &lt;cite&gt;Conceptual Spaces: The Geometry of Thought&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;F. Hayek, &lt;cite&gt;The Sensory Order&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Simon Haykin, Jos&amp;eacute; C. Príncipe, Terrence J. Sejnowski and
John McWhirter, &lt;cite&gt;New Directions in Statistical Signal Processing: From
Systems to Brains&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://mitpress.mit.edu/0-262-08348-5&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;D. Herschkowitz and M. Opper, &quot;Retarded Learning: Rigorous Results
from Statistical Mechanics,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0103275&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0103275&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Dirk Husmeier, &lt;cite&gt;Neural Networks for Conditional Probability
Estimation&lt;/citE&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Jun-ichi Inoue and A. C. C. Coolen, &quot;Dynamics of on-line Hebbian
learning with structurally unrealizable restricted training sets,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0105004&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0105004&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Henrik Jacobsson, &quot;Rule Extraction from Recurrent Neural Networks:
A Taxonomy and
Review&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://neco.mitpress.org/cgi/content/abstract/17/6/1223&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Neural
Computation&lt;/citE&gt; &lt;strong&gt;17&lt;/strong&gt; (2005): 1223--1263&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Jim W. Kay and D. M. Titterington (eds.), &lt;cite&gt;Statistics and
Neural Networks: Advances at the Interface&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt; I. Kanter, W. Kinzel and E. Kanter, &quot;Secure exchange of
information by synchronization of neural networks,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0202112&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0202112&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Alon Keinan, Ben Sandbank, Claus C. Hilgetag, Isaac Meilijson and
Eytan Ruppin, &quot;Fair Attribution of Functional Contribution in Artificial and
Biological Networks&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://neco.mitpress.org/cgi/content/abstract/16/9/1887&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Neural
Computation&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;16&lt;/strong&gt; (2004): 1887--1915&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Beom Jun Kim, &quot;Performance of networks of artificial neurons: The
role of clustering&quot;,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/q-bio.NC/0402045&quot;&gt;q-bio.NC/0402045&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Osame Kinouchi and Nestor Caticha, &quot;Optimal Generalization in
Perceptrons,&quot; &lt;cite&gt;Journal of Physics A&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;25&lt;/strong&gt; (1992):
6243--6250
	&lt;li&gt;W. Kinzel
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;Statistical Physics of Neural Networks,&quot; &lt;cite&gt;Computer
Physics Communications,&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;122&lt;/strong&gt; (1999): 86--93
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;Phase transitions of neural networks,&quot;
&lt;cite&gt;Philosophical Magazine B&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;77&lt;/strong&gt; (1998): 1455--1477
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;W. Kinzel, R. Metzler and I. Kanter, &quot;Dynamics of Interacting
Neural Networks,&quot; &lt;cite&gt;Journal of Physica A&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;33&lt;/strong&gt; (2000):
L141--L147
	&lt;li&gt;Konstantin Klemm, Stefan Bornholdt and Heinz Georg Schuster,
&quot;Beyond Hebb: XOR and biological learning,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/adap-org/9909005&quot;&gt;adap-org/9909005&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;G.A. Kohring, &quot;Artificial Neurons with Arbitrarily Complex
Internal Structures,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arXiv.org/abs/cs/0108009&quot;&gt;cs.NE/0108009&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Kohonen, &lt;cite&gt;&lt;a
href=&quot;self-organization.html&quot;&gt;Self-organization&lt;/a&gt; and associative
memory&lt;/cite&gt; [Start of the huge literature on self-organizing maps, which I
ought to get a grip on]
	&lt;li&gt;John F. Kolen (ed.), &lt;cite&gt;A Field Guide to Dynamical Recurrent
Networks&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Krogh et al., &lt;cite&gt;Introduction to the Theory of Neural
Computation&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Hannes Leitgeb, &quot;Interpreted Dynamical Systems and Qualitative
Laws: From Neural Networks to Evolutionary Systems&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11229-005-9086-5&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Synthese&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;146&lt;/strong&gt;
(2005): 189--202&lt;/a&gt; [&quot;Interpreted dynamical systems are dynamical systems with
an additional interpretation mapping by which propositional formulas are
assigned to system states. The dynamics of such systems may be described in
terms of qualitative laws for which a satisfaction clause is defined. We show
that the systems C and CL of nonmonotonic logic are adequate with respect to
the corresponding description of the classes of interpreted ordered and
interpreted hierarchical systems, respectively&quot;]
	&lt;li&gt;Andrea Loettgers, &quot;Getting Abstract Mathematical Models in Touch
with
Nature&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0269889706001153&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Science in
Context&lt;/cite&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;20&lt;/strong&gt; (2007): 97--124&lt;/a&gt; [Intellectual history of the Hopfield
model and its reception]
	&lt;li&gt;Yonatan Loewenstein, and H. Sebastian Seung, &quot;Operant matching is a
generic outcome of synaptic plasticity based on the covariance between reward
and neural activity&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0505220103&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences&lt;/cite&gt; (USA) &lt;strong&gt;103&lt;/strong&gt; (2006):
15224--15229&lt;/a&gt; [The abstract promises a result about all possible neural
mechanisms having some fairly generic features; this is clearly the right way
to do theoretical neuroscience, but rarely done...]
	&lt;li&gt;Wolfgang Maass (ed.), &lt;citE&gt;Pulsed Neural Networks&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Wolfgang Maass and Eduardo D. Sontag, &quot;Neural Systems as Nonlinear
Filters,&quot; &lt;citE&gt;Neural Computation&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;12&lt;/strong&gt; (2000):
1743--1772
	&lt;li&gt;M. S. Mainieri and R. Erichsen Jr, &quot;Retrieval and Chaos in
Extremely Diluted Non-Monotonic Neural Networks,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0202097&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0202097&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Daniele Marinazzo, Mario Pellicoro, Sebastiano Stramaglia, &quot;Causal
interactions and delays in a neuronal ensemble&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0609523&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0609523&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;McClelland and Rumelhart (ed.), &lt;cite&gt;Parallel Distributed
Processing&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Patrick C. McGuire, Henrik Bohr, John W. Clark, Robert Haschke,
Chris Pershing and Johann Rafelski, &quot;Threshold Disorder as a Source of Diverse
and Complex Behavior in Random Nets,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0202190&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0202190&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Richard Metzler, Wolfgang Kinzel, Liat Ein-Dor and Ido Kanter,
&quot;Generation of anti-predictable time series by a Neural Network,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0011302&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0011302&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;R. Metzler, W. Kinzel and I. Kanter, &quot;Interacting Neural
Networks,&quot; &lt;cite&gt;Physical Review E&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;62&lt;/strong&gt; (2000):
2555--2565 [&lt;a href=&quot;http://link.aps.org/abstract/PRE/v62/p2555&quot;&gt;abstract&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Minsky and Papert, &lt;cite&gt;Perceptrons&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Seiji Miyoshi, Kazuyuki Hara, and Masato Okada, &quot;Analysis of
ensemble learning using simple perceptrons based on online learning theory&quot;,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.71.036116&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Physical Review
E&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;71&lt;/strong&gt; (2005): 036116&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Javier R. Movellan, Paul Mineiro, and R. J. Williams, &quot;A Monte
Carlo EM Approach for Partially Observable Diffusion Processes: Theory and
Applications to Neural Networks,&quot; &lt;cite&gt;Neural Computation&lt;/cite&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;14&lt;/strong&gt; (20020: 1507--1544
	&lt;li&gt;Randall C. O'Reilly, &quot;Generalization in Interactive Networks: The
Benefits of Inhibitory Competition and Hebbian Learning,&quot; &lt;cite&gt;Neural
Computation&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;13&lt;/strong&gt; (2001): 1199--1241
	&lt;li&gt;Steven Phillips, &quot;Systematic Minds, Unsystematic Models:
Learning Transfer in Humans and Networks&quot;, &lt;cite&gt;Minds and Machines&lt;/cite&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;9&lt;/strong&gt; (1999): 383--398
	&lt;li&gt;Patrick D. Roberts, &quot;Dynamics of Temporal Learning Rules,&quot;
&lt;cite&gt;Physical Review E&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;62&lt;/strong&gt; (2000): 4077--4082
	&lt;li&gt;Fabrice Rossi, Brieuc Conan-Guez, &quot;Functional Multi-Layer Perceptron: a Nonlinear Tool for Functional Data Analysis&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/0709.3642&quot;&gt;arxiv:0709.3642&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Fabrice Rossi, Nicolas Delannay, Brieuc Conan-Guez, Michel
Verleysen, &quot;Representation of Functional Data in Neural
Networks&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/0709.3641&quot;&gt;arxiv:0709.3641&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Ines Samengo, &quot;Independent neurons representing a finite set of
stimuli: dependence of the mutual information on the number of units sampled,&quot;
&lt;cite&gt;Network: Computation in Neural Systems,&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;12&lt;/strong&gt;
(2000): 21--31, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0202023&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0202023&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Ines Samengo and Alessandro Treves, &quot;Representational capacity of a
set of independent neurons,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0201588&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0201588&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Vitaly Schetinin and Anatoly Brazhnikov, &quot;Diagnostic Rule
Extraction Using Neural Networks&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.NE/0504057&quot;&gt;cs.NE/0504057&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Philip Seliger, Stephen C. Young, and Lev S. Tsimring, &quot;Plasticity
and learning in a network of coupled phase oscillators,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/nlin.AO/0110044&quot;&gt;nlin.AO/0110044&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Paul Smolensky and G&amp;eacute;raldine Legendre, &lt;cite&gt;The Harmonic
Mind: From Neural Computation to Optimality-Theoretic Grammar&lt;/ctie&gt; [2 volume
set.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://mitpress.mit.edu.edu/0-262-19528-3&quot;&gt;Blurb, contents&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Dietrich Stauffer and Amnon Aharony, &quot;Efficient Hopfield pattern
recognition on a scale-free neural network,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0212601&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0212601&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Samy Tindel, &quot;The stochastic calculus method for spin systems&quot;,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10%2E1214/009117904000000919&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Annals of
Probability&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;33&lt;/strong&gt; (2005): 561--581&lt;/a&gt; = &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.PR/0503652&quot;&gt;math.PR/0503652&lt;/a&gt; [One of the
kind of spin systems being perceptrons]
	&lt;li&gt;Marc Toussaint
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;On model selection and the disability of neural networks
to decompose tasks,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/nlin.AO/0202038&quot;&gt;nlin.AO/0202038&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;A neural model for multi-expert architectures,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/nlin.AO/0202039&quot;&gt;nlin.AO/0202039&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;T. Uezu and A. C. C. Coolen, &quot;Hierarchical Self-Programming in
Recurrent Neural Networks,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0109099&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0109099&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Robert Urbanczik, &quot;Statistical Physics of Feedforward Neural
Networks,&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0201530&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0201530&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Leslie G. Valiant
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Circuits of the Mind&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;Memorization and Association on a Realistic Neural Model&quot;,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://neco.mitpress.org/cgi/content/abstract/17/3/527&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Neural
Computation&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;17&lt;/strong&gt; (2005): 527--555&lt;/a&gt; [&quot;A central open
question of computational neuroscience is to identify the data structures and
algorithms that are used in mammalian cortex to support successive acts of the
basic cognitive tasks of memorization and association. This letter addresses
the simultaneous challenges of realizing these two distinct tasks with the same
data structure, and doing so while respecting the following four basic
quantitative parameters of cortex: the neuron number, the synapse number, the
synapse strengths, and the switching times. Previous work has not succeeded in
reconciling these opposing constraints, the low values of synapse strengths
that are typically observed experimentally having contributed a particular
obstacle. In this article, we describe a computational scheme that supports
both memory formation and association and is feasible on networks of model
neurons that respect the widely observed values of the four quantitative
parameters. Our scheme allows for both disjoint and shared representations. The
algorithms are simple, and in one version both memorization and association
require just one step of vicinal or neighborly influence. The issues of
interference among the different circuits that are established, of robustness
to noise, and of the stability of the hierarchical memorization process are
addressed. A calculus therefore is implied for analyzing the capabilities of
particular neural systems and subsystems, in terms of their basic numerical
parameters.&quot;]
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Frank van der Velde and Marc de Kamps, &quot;Neural blackboard
architectures of combinatorial structures in
cognition&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X06009022&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Behavioral and Brain
Sciences&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;29&lt;/strong&gt; (2006): 37--70&lt;/a&gt; [+ peer commentary]
	&lt;li&gt;W. A. van Leeuwen and Bastian Wemmenhove, &quot;Learning by a neural net
in a noisy environment - The pseudo-inverse solution revisited,&quot;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0205550&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0205550&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Renato Vicente, Osame Kinouchi and Nestor Caticha, &quot;Statistical
mechanics of online learning of drifting concepts: A variational approach,&quot;
&lt;cite&gt;Machine Learning&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;32&lt;/strong&gt; (1998): 179--201 [&lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.wkap.nl/oasis.htm/168704&quot;&gt;abstract&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Hiroshi Wakuya and Jacek M. Zurada, &quot;Bi-directional computing
architecture for time series prediction,&quot; &lt;citE&gt;Neural Networks&lt;/cite&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;14&lt;/strong&gt; (2001): 1307--1321
	&lt;li&gt;C. Xiang, S. Ding and T. H. Lee, &quot;Geometrical Interpretation and
Architecture Selection of MLP&quot;, &lt;cite&gt;IEEE Transactions on Neural
Networks&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;16&lt;/strong&gt; (2005): 84--96 [MLP = multi-layer
perceptron]
	&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>