<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- name="generator" content="blosxom/2.0" -->
<!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN" "http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd">

<rss version="0.91">
  <channel>
    <title>Notebooks   </title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks</link>
    <description>Cosma's Notebooks</description>
    <language>en</language>

  <item>
    <title>Particle physics</title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks/1994/10/03#particle-physics</link>
    <description>
&lt;P&gt;[I'm leaving the next few paragraphs just as I wrote them in 1994, out of
a sort of embarrassed nostalgia.]

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;em&gt;
And all I see is little dots
&lt;br&gt;Some are smears some are spots
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It's not just a discipline (cf.
&lt;a href=&quot;news:alt.sex.bondage.particle-physics&quot;&gt;
alt.sex.bondage.particle-physics&lt;/a&gt;) it is, to an unblushing, unreconstructed
materialist &lt;a href=&quot;reductionism.html&quot;&gt;reductionist&lt;/a&gt; like
myself, &lt;em&gt;the&lt;/em&gt; discipline.  (Well, I blush, but not for particle
physics.)  Frankly, the idea that the Republic can come up with another $25
billion in lethal toys, and $60 billion in tax-cuts for the rich, but can't
afford the SSC or the national labs, &quot;maketh my gorge to rise.&quot;  I suppose if
we manage to discover something obscenely hideous, we'll get another half
century of decent funding.

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;em&gt;
When they split those atoms
&lt;br&gt;It's hotter than the sun
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;



&lt;ul&gt;To read:
	&lt;li&gt;Are Strandlie and Rudolf Fr&amp;uuml;hwirth, &quot;Track and
vertex reconstruction: From classical to adaptive methods&quot;, &lt;cite&gt;Reviews
of Modern Physics&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;82&lt;/strong&gt; (2010): 1419--1458 [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hephy.at/fileadmin/user_upload/Fachbereiche/ASE/Strandlie.pdf&quot;&gt;Preprint&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
