<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- name="generator" content="blosxom/2.0" -->
<!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN" "http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd">

<rss version="0.91">
  <channel>
    <title>Notebooks   </title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks</link>
    <description>Cosma's Notebooks</description>
    <language>en</language>

  <item>
    <title>Philosophy of Mind</title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks/1994/10/03#philosophy-of-mind</link>
    <description>

&lt;P&gt;The academic discpline formerly known as philosophical psychology.  Not
quite the same thing as &lt;a href=&quot;cognitive-science.html&quot;&gt;cognitive science&lt;/a&gt;,
or &lt;a href=&quot;neuroscience.html&quot;&gt;neuroscience&lt;/a&gt;, or even &lt;a
href=&quot;ai.html&quot;&gt;artificial intelligence&lt;/a&gt;; unless the philosopher of mind
decides that it is, and polemicizes accordingly.

&lt;P&gt;&lt;em&gt;See also&lt;/em&gt;:
	&lt;a href=&quot;neural-nets.html&quot;&gt;Connectionism&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;dynamics-cognition.html&quot;&gt;Dynamics and Cognition&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;Recommended:
	&lt;li&gt;David Chalmers, &lt;cite&gt;The Conscious Mind&lt;/cite&gt; [Revision of his
doctoral thesis, which is online someplace]
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;dennett.html&quot;&gt;Daniel Dennett&lt;/a&gt;, especially &lt;cite&gt;Consciousness Explained&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Clark Glymour
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;Silicon Reflections&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00000141/&quot;&gt;phil-sci/141&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;A Mind Is a Terrible Thing to Waste&quot;,
&lt;cite&gt;Philosophy of Science&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;66&lt;/strong&gt; (1999): 455--471 [An
entertaining, and pretty strong, attack on large swathes of contemporary
philosophy of mind, by way of a review of Kim's &lt;cite&gt;Mind in a Physical
World&lt;/cite&gt;.  Concludes: &quot;whether the mechanisms underlying conscious mental
states are separable from the mechanisms of purposive action is what matters to
our conception of ourselves, and that is an empirical, not a metaphysical,
question.&quot;  &lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.hss.cmu.edu/philosophy/glymour/glymour-kim1999.pdf&quot;&gt;PDF
reprint&lt;/a&gt;]
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;When Is a Brain Like the Planet?&quot;,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/521968&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Philosophy of
Science&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;74&lt;/strong&gt; (2007): 330--347&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Carsten Griesel, &quot;The Type-Token Distinction and the Mind and Brain Sciences&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00003860/&quot;&gt;phil-sci/3860&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;hume.html&quot;&gt;David Hume&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;wm-james.html&quot;&gt;William James&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;cite&gt;Principles of
Psychology&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/James/Principles/&quot;&gt;Online&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Pete Mandik and Andy Clark, &quot;Selective Representing and
World-Making,&quot;, &lt;cite&gt;Minds and Machines&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;12&lt;/strong&gt; (2002):
383--395 [&lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.wpunj.edu/cohss/philosophy/faculty/mandik/papers/srwm.PDF&quot;&gt;PDF&lt;/a&gt;.
I've commented on this paper &lt;a href=&quot;http://bactra.org/weblog/000102.html&quot;&gt;in
my blog&lt;/a&gt;.]
	&lt;li&gt;Ruth Garrett Millikan, &lt;cite&gt;Language, Thought and Other Biological
Categories&lt;/cite&gt; [To be honest, I'm not quite finished with it yet, but unless
it takes a drastic turn for the worse in the last few chapters, this is
excellent]
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;piaget.html&quot;&gt;Jean Piaget&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;cite&gt;Insights and Illusions
of Philosophy&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Gilbert Ryle, &lt;cite&gt;The Concept of Mind&lt;/cite&gt; [While thoroughly
wrong-headed in opposing non-behavioristic psychology and mechanistic
accounts of the mind, it's at the very least &lt;em&gt;useful to think against,&lt;/em&gt;
and quite well-written.]
	&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;To read:
	&lt;li&gt;Phil Agre, &lt;cite&gt;Computation and Human Experience&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Tim Bayne and Elisabeth Pacherie, &quot;Narrators and comparators: the
architecture of agentive
self-awareness&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11229-007-9239-9&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Synthese&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;159&lt;/strong&gt;
(2007): 475--491&lt;/a&gt; [&quot;an agent's narrative self-conception has a role to play
in explaining their agentive judgments, but that agentive experiences are
explained by low-level comparator mechanisms that are grounded in the very
machinery responsible for action-production.&quot;]
	&lt;li&gt;Susan Blackmore, &lt;cite&gt;Consciousness: An Introduction&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Radu J. Bogdan
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Interprreting Minds&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Minding Minds: Evolving a Reflexive Mind by
Interpreting Others&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a
href=&quot;http://mitpress.mit.edu/0-262-02467-5&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Deborah J. Brown, &lt;cite&gt;Descartes and the Passionate Mind&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cambridge.org/0521857287&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;.  &quot;Descartes is often
accused of having fragmented the human being into two independent substances,
mind and body, with no clear strategy for explaining the apparent unity of
human experience. ... [A]rgues that, contrary to this view, Descartes did in
fact have a conception of a single, integrated human being, and that in his
view this conception is crucial to the success of human beings as rational and
moral agents and as practitioners of science. The passions are pivotal in this
... examines Descartes' place in the tradition of thought about the passions,
the metaphysics of actions and passions, sensory representation, and Descartes'
account of self-mastery and virtue.&quot;]
	&lt;li&gt;Sue Campbell, &lt;cite&gt;Interpreting the Personal: Expression and
the Formation of Feelings&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;William J. Clancey, &lt;cite&gt;Situated Cognition: On Human Knowledge
and Computer Representations&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Andy Clark, &lt;cite&gt;Being There&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Murray Clarke, &lt;cite&gt;Reconstructing Reason and Representation&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http;//mitpress.mit.edu/0-262-03322-4&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Rodney Cotterill, &lt;cite&gt;Enchanted Looms: Conscious Networks in
Brains and Computers&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.cup.org/Titles/62/0521624355.html&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Stanislas Dehaene (ed.), &lt;cite&gt;The Cognitive Neuroscience of Consciousness&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Fred Dretske, &lt;cite&gt;Naturalizing the Mind&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;David H. Finkelstein, &lt;cite&gt;Expression and the Inner&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog/FINEXP.html&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Owen Flanagan
		 &lt;ul&gt;
		 &lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Self-Expressions&lt;/cite&gt;
		 &lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;The Problem of the Soul&lt;/citE&gt;
		 &lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://philrsss.anu.edu.au/~pgs/&quot;&gt;Peter Godfrey-Smith&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Complexity and the Function of the Mind in
Nature&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;Enviromental Complexity and the Evolution of
Cognition&quot; [Summary of &lt;cite&gt;Complexity and the Function of the Mind&lt;/cite&gt;;
&lt;a
href=&quot;http://philrsss.anu.edu.au/~pgs/Online_papers/PGSComplexity&amp;Cog2002.pdf&quot;&gt;PDF&lt;/a&gt;]
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;Model-Based Science and the Representational Theory of
Mind&quot; [&lt;a
href=&quot;http://philrsss.anu.edu.au/~pgs/Online_papers/PGSonRTM04L.pdf&quot;&gt;PDF&lt;/a&gt;]
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Alvin I. Goldman, &lt;cite&gt;Simulating Minds: The Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience of Mindreading&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Steven Harnad, &quot;The Symbol Grounding Problem&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/9906002&quot;&gt;cs/9906002&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Ray Jackendoff, &lt;cite&gt;Consciousness and the Computational
Mind&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262600194&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Simon Kemp, &lt;cite&gt;Cognitive Psychology in the Middle Ages&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Tiago V. Maia and Axel Cleeremans, &quot;Consciousness: converging
insights from connectionist modeling and neuroscience&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.06.016&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Trends in Cognitive
Sciences&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;9&lt;/strong&gt; (2005): 397--404&lt;/a&gt; [&quot;Over the past decade,
many findings in cognitive neuroscience have resulted in the view that
selective attention, working memory and cognitive control involve competition
between widely distributed representations. This competition is biased by
top-down projections (notably from prefrontal cortex), which can selectively
enhance some representations over others. This view has now been implemented in
several connectionist models. In this review, we emphasize the relevance of
these models to understanding consciousness. Interestingly, the models we
review have striking similarities to others directly aimed at implementing
'global workspace theory'. All of these models embody a fundamental principle
that has been used in many connectionist models over the past twenty years:
global constraint satisfaction.&quot;]
	&lt;li&gt;Drew V. McDermott, &lt;cite&gt;Mind and Mechanism&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Thomas Metzinger, &lt;cite&gt;Being No One: The Self-Model Theory of Subjectivity&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262633086&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Ruth Garrett Millikan
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.bbsonline.org/documents/a/00/00/05/18/&quot;&gt;A common
structure for concepts of individuals, stuffs, and real kinds: More Mama, more
milk, and more mouse&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Varieties of Meaning&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;White Queen Psychology and Other Essays for
Alice&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Thomas W. Polger, &lt;cite&gt;Natural Minds&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a
href=&quot;http://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/item/default.asp?sid=B546F434-957F-4F4B-B72B-6B639ACFE178&amp;ttype=2&amp;tid=10122&amp;mlid=262&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Zenon W. Pylyshyn, &lt;cite&gt;Computation and Cognition: Toward a
Foundation for Cognitive Science&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;William J. Rapaport, &quot;How Hellen Keller used syntactic semantics to
escape from a Chinese
Room&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11023-007-9054-6&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Minds and
Machines&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;16&lt;/strong&gt; (2006): 381--436&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Matthias Scheutz, &quot;When Physical Systems Realize Functions...&quot;,
&lt;cite&gt;Minds and Machines&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;9&lt;/strong&gt; (1999): 161--196 [&quot;I argue
that standard notions of computation together with a 'state-to-state
correspondence view of implementation' cannot overcome difficulties posed by
Putnam's Realization Theorem and that, therefore, a different approach to
implementation is required.  The notion 'realization of a function', developed
out of physical theories, is then introduced as a replacement for the notional
pair, 'computation-implementation'.  After gradual refinement, taking practical
constraints into account, this notion gives rise to the notion 'digital
system' which singles out physical systems that could be actually used, and
possibly even built.&quot;]
	&lt;li&gt;Kim Sterelny
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;The Representational Theory of Mind: An
Introduction&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Thought in a Hostile World: The Evolution of Human
Cognition&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Patrick Suppes, &quot;Voluntary Motion, Biological Computation, and Free
Will&quot;, in P. A. French, T. E. Uehling and H. K. Wettstein (eds.), &lt;cite&gt;Midwest
Studies in Philosophy,&lt;/cite&gt; vol. XIX, &lt;citE&gt;Philosophical Naturalism&lt;/cite&gt;
(Univiersity of Notre Dame Press, 1994), pp. 452--467
	&lt;li&gt;Varela, Thompson and Rosch, &lt;cite&gt;The Embodied Mind&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>