<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- name="generator" content="blosxom/2.0" -->
<!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN" "http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd">

<rss version="0.91">
  <channel>
    <title>Notebooks   </title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks</link>
    <description>Cosma's Notebooks</description>
    <language>en</language>

  <item>
    <title>Positivism</title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks/2009/04/10#positivism</link>
    <description>


My positivism is largely temperamental: that is, I am incapable of lending
credence to someone like &lt;a href=&quot;fraud-1.html&quot;&gt;Hegel&lt;/a&gt; or St. John the
Divine, though I recognize they are very different.  (Hegel makes me want to
cry ``bullshit!'' or throw away the book, but I'd ask St. John to share his
drugs, or have him committed if he didn't need any.  I suspect he would have to
be committed.)  They are both, however, mad.  So is everyone, or nearly
everyone, as soon as we get away from the checks and controls of observation
and survival.  Man is the irrational animal.

&lt;P&gt;Sometimes this makes me want to cry or scream; at others it is simply
amusing, in a mildly morbid way, and I think that much preferable.  I'd like to
see the ``sick men's dreams'' replaced by the ``calm sunshine of the mind''
(Hume), but the lion will lay down with the lamb, and the Serb with the
Bosnian, before that happens.  In the meanwhile, a useful or at least
entertaining empirical project would be a &lt;em&gt;nosology&lt;/em&gt; of human thought,
or a catalog of its diseases: and we may one day speak of Hegel's Syndrome, or
a Johannine Malignancy.

&lt;P&gt;&lt;em&gt;See also&lt;/em&gt;
	&lt;a href=&quot;claude-bernard.html&quot;&gt;Claude Bernard&lt;/A&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;gellner.html&quot;&gt;Ernest Gellner&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;logical-positivism.html&quot;&gt;Logical positivism&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;pragmatism.html&quot;&gt;Pragmatism&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;scientific-method.html&quot;&gt;Scientific method&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;ul&gt;Recommended:
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;kolakowski.html&quot;&gt;Leszek Kolakowski&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;cite&gt;History of
Positivist Thought.&lt;/cite&gt; [The first edition, translated as &lt;cite&gt;Alienation
of Reason,&lt;/cite&gt; was written while the author was still in Poland, and some of
the things I object to in it may have been necessary to get it past the
censors.  I haven't gotten hold of the second edition, which was revised by the
author after his exile.]
	&lt;li&gt;David Stove, &lt;cite&gt;The Plato Cult and Other Philosophical
Follies.&lt;/cite&gt; [Marvellously amusing book.  First proposed the nosology.]
	&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;To read:
	&lt;li&gt;August Comte, &lt;cite&gt;Course in Positive Philosophy&lt;/cite&gt; [Selected
and edited by Stanislav Andreski; I don't have my whole life to devote to the
project...]
	&lt;li&gt;Hayek, &lt;cite&gt;The Counter-Revolution of Science&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;V. I. Lenin, &lt;cite&gt;Materialism and Empiro-Criticism&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Ernst Mach
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;The Analysis of Sensation, and the Relation of the
Physical to the Psychical&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Knowledge and Error&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Frank Manuel, &lt;Cite&gt;The New World of Henri Saint-Simon&lt;/cite&gt;
[Comte's master]
	&lt;li&gt;Richard von Mises, &lt;cite&gt;Positivism&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>