<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- name="generator" content="blosxom/2.0" -->
<!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN" "http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd">

<rss version="0.91">
  <channel>
    <title>Notebooks   </title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks</link>
    <description>Cosma's Notebooks</description>
    <language>en</language>

  <item>
    <title>Prophecy</title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks/2003/01/19#prophecy</link>
    <description>




&lt;blockquote&gt;Amongst all forms of mistake, prophecy is the most gratuitious.
	&lt;br&gt;---George Eliot, &lt;citE&gt;Middlemarch,&lt;/cite&gt; bk. I, ch. 10&lt;/blockquote&gt;

A.k.a. futurology.  Bunk, of course --- see &lt;a href=&quot;popper.html&quot;&gt;Popper&lt;/a&gt;
--- but there's a damn lot of it, and I know of at least one case where it has
served a useful function.  (Namely, the efforts of J. B. S. Haldane, Bertrand
Russell, and J. D. Bernal inspired much good science fiction, as have the more
recent efforts of their self-conscious successor Freeman Dyson.)

&lt;ul&gt;See:
	&lt;li&gt;J. D. Bernal, &lt;cite&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;../Bernal/&quot;&gt;The World, the Flesh and
the Devil&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/cite&gt; (1929)
	&lt;li&gt;Freeman Dyson
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Infinite in All Directions&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Imagined Worlds&lt;/cite&gt; [I've written a review --- &lt;a
href=&quot;../reviews/imagined-worlds/&quot;&gt;Uncle Freeman's Stories&lt;/a&gt; --- on why I
don't take even Dyson at all seriously]
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;J. B. S. Haldane, &lt;cite&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;../Daedalus.html&quot;&gt;Daedalus, or
Science and the Future&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/cite&gt; (1923)
	&lt;li&gt;Karl &lt;a href=&quot;popper.html&quot;&gt;Popper&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;cite&gt;The Poverty of
Historicism&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Bertrand &lt;a href=&quot;bertrand-russell.html&quot;&gt;Russell&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;cite&gt;&lt;a
href=&quot;../Icarus.html&quot;&gt;Icarus, or the Future of Science&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/cite&gt; (1924)
	&lt;li&gt;Bruce Sterling, &lt;cite&gt;Tomorrow Now: Envisioning the Next Fifty
Years&lt;/cite&gt; (2002) [Futurology by an excellent science fiction writer, fully
conscious of the fact that it's going to look bizarrely wrong in much less than
fifty years.  Very good as a tour of &lt;em&gt;underappreciated bits of the
present.&lt;/em&gt;] &lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;To read:
	&lt;li&gt;B. de Jouvenal, &lt;cite&gt;Art of Conjecture&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Max Dublin, &lt;cite&gt;Futurehype&lt;/cite&gt; [It appears Mr.  Dublin
only objects to &lt;em&gt;optimistic&lt;/em&gt; futurologists, as he takes 
&lt;a href=&quot;rifkin.html&quot;&gt;Jeremy Rifkin&lt;/a&gt;'s nonsense about entropy as gospel.]
	&lt;li&gt;Nicholas Rescher, &lt;cite&gt;Predicting the Future&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;William Sherden, &lt;cite&gt;The Fortune Sellers&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>