Notebooks

Religion

03 Oct 1994 12:02

I'm particularly interested in what one might call, with a nod towards Mr. Hume, the natural history of religion --- religion considered as an utterly mundane, human phenomenon, something invoking various mental and social processes, much like book-collecting, politics or protection rackets, all of which, in some ways, resemble it. The basic observations about the natural histories of religion are that (1) religion is nearly but not quite universal; (2) religions are not believed because they are true; (3) every religion is full of wishful thinking, and the more popular the strain, the more wishful it is, and the more anthropomorphic. (A brief explanation of (2): mainfestly at most one religion can be correct. Therefore most of them cannot be believed because they are true, because they are not. Supposing there is one which is true, the others cannot be believed because they are true. But even supposing there is a true faith, it is manifestly propagated by exactly the same mechanisms as all the false ones, so its truth is not the reason it is adhered to.)

See also: Cognitive Science; Conversion; Cults; Goddess, The; Initiation Rites; Islam; Magic; Memes; Millenarianism; Myths; Possession; Shamanism; Social Neuroscience; Sociology; Superstition; Terrorism; Zen


Notebooks:     Hosted, but not endorsed, by the Center for the Study of Complex Systems