<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- name="generator" content="blosxom/2.0" -->
<!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN" "http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd">

<rss version="0.91">
  <channel>
    <title>Notebooks   </title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks</link>
    <description>Cosma's Notebooks</description>
    <language>en</language>

  <item>
    <title>Religion</title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks/1994/10/03#religion</link>
    <description>
&lt;P&gt;I'm particularly interested in what one might call, with a nod towards
Mr. Hume, the natural history of religion --- religion considered as an utterly
mundane, human phenomenon, something invoking various mental and social
processes, much like book-collecting, politics or protection rackets, all of
which, in some ways, resemble it.  The basic observations about the natural
histories of religion would seem to be that (1) religion is nearly but not
quite universal among human beings; (2) religions are not believed because they
are true; (3) every religion is full of wishful thinking, and the more popular
the strain, the more wishful it is, and the more anthropomorphic.  (A brief
explanation of (2): at most one religion can be correct.  Therefore most of
them cannot be believed because they are true, because they are not.  But even
if we suppose that one of the existing faiths is true, it is manifestly
propagated by exactly the same mechanisms as all the false ones, so its truth
is not the reason it is adhered to.)

&lt;P&gt;See also:
	&lt;a href=&quot;cognitive-science.html&quot;&gt;Cognitive Science&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;conversion.html&quot;&gt;Conversion&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;cults.html&quot;&gt;Cults&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;goddess.html&quot;&gt;Goddess, The&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;initiation-rites.html&quot;&gt;Initiation Rites&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;islam.html&quot;&gt;Islam&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;magic.html&quot;&gt;Magic&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;memes.html&quot;&gt;Memes&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;millenarian.html&quot;&gt;Millenarianism&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;myths.html&quot;&gt;Myths&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;possession.html&quot;&gt;Possession&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;shamanism.html&quot;&gt;Shamanism&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;social-neuroscience.html&quot;&gt;Social Neuroscience&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;sociology.html&quot;&gt;Sociology&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;superstition.html&quot;&gt;Superstition&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;terrorism.html&quot;&gt;Terrorism&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;zen.html&quot;&gt;Zen&lt;/a&gt;


&lt;ul&gt;Recommended:
	&lt;li&gt;Scott Atran, &lt;cite&gt;In Gods We Trust: The Evolutionary Landscape of
Religion&lt;/cite&gt; [But he seems to me to be wrong about religions being
&lt;em&gt;necessary&lt;/em&gt; to wide-spread social trust]
	&lt;li&gt;Justin L. Barrett, &quot;Exploring the natural foundations of religion&quot;,
&lt;cite&gt;Trends in Cognitive Sciences&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;4&lt;/strong&gt; (2000): 29--34
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/~pboyer/&quot;&gt;Pascal Boyer&lt;/a&gt;,
&quot;Why Is Religion Natural?&quot;, &lt;cite&gt;Skeptical Inquirer&lt;/cite&gt; (May 2004) [&lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.csicop.org/si/2004-03/religion.html&quot;&gt;Online&lt;/a&gt;; popular
summary of ch. 1 of his book on the explanation of religion, listed below]
	&lt;li&gt;Ernest &lt;a href=&quot;gellner.html&quot;&gt;Gellner&lt;/a&gt;, &quot;Flux and Reflux in the
Faiths of Men&quot; in his &lt;citE&gt;Muslim Society&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;John B. Henderson, &lt;cite&gt;The Construction of Orthodoxy and
Heterodoxy: Neo-Confucian, Islamic, Jewish, and Early Christian Patterns&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;David &lt;a href=&quot;hume.html&quot;&gt;Hume&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;citE&gt;The Natural History of Religion&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Marshall G. S. Hodgson, &lt;cite&gt;The Venture of Islam&lt;/cite&gt; [Has many
excellent observations on the history of religions (natural and otherwise)
which extend far beyond Islam]
	&lt;li&gt;W. G. Runciman, &quot;The Diffusion of Christianity in the Third Century
AD as a Case-Study in the Theory of Cultural Selection&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003975604001365&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;European Journal of
Sociology&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;45&lt;/strong&gt; (2004): 3--21&lt;/a&gt; [For more on Runciman's
theory of cultural selection, see &lt;a href=&quot;memes.html&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.]
    	&lt;/ul&gt;


&lt;ul&gt;To read:
	&lt;li&gt;Timothy Beal, &lt;cite&gt;Religion and Its Monsters&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Maurice Bloch, &lt;cite&gt;Prey into Hunter: The Politics of Religious
Experience&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/~pboyer/&quot;&gt;Pascal Boyer&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;The Naturalness of Religious Ideas&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;citE&gt;Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Origins of
Religious Thought&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Jenny-Ann Brodin, &quot;A Matter of Choice: A Micro-Level Study on how
Swedish New Agers Choose their Religious Beliefs and Practices&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10434631030153005&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Rationality and
Society&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;15&lt;/strong&gt; (2003): 381--405&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Steve Bruce, &lt;cite&gt;God Is Dead: Secularization in the West&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;David Clingingsmith, Asim Ijaz Khwaja and Michael Kremer, &quot;Estimating the Impact of The Hajj: Religion and Tolerance in Islam's Global Gathering&quot;,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2009.124.3.1133&quot;&gt;&lt;citE&gt;Quarterly
Journal of Economics&lt;/citE&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;124&lt;/strong&gt; (2009): 1133--1170&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;William R. Drees, &lt;cite&gt;Religion, Science and Naturalism&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Emile Durkheim, &lt;cite&gt;Elementary Forms of Religions Life&lt;/cite&gt;
[This notion that &lt;em&gt;rituals&lt;/em&gt; instill &lt;em&gt;concepts&lt;/em&gt; seems incredibly
wrong-headed to me, if only because &lt;em&gt;participating in&lt;/em&gt; a ritual demands
a fair bit of cognitive, conceptual machinery.  So it'll be just as well to get
the idea from the original source.  I've got some links to critical literature
in &lt;a href=&quot;thought-and-society.html&quot;&gt;Thought and Society&lt;/a&gt;.]
	&lt;li&gt;Richard K. Fenn, &lt;cite&gt;Beyond Idols: The Shape of a Secular
Society&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;S. E. Guthrie, &lt;cite&gt;Faces in the Clouds: A New Theory of
Religion&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Daniele Hervieu-Leger, &lt;cite&gt;Religion as a Chain of Memory&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Caroline Humphrey and James Laidlaw, &lt;cite&gt;The Archetypal Actions
of Ritual&lt;/cite&gt; [&quot;What happens in religious traditions when the nature of the
ritual is questioned, but the practice of performing rituals is not itself
abandoned? How is it that people can accomplish ritual successfully without
belief, and even without attributing any meaning to it? This book draws on the
authors' observations of such reactions among Jains in western India, and asks
what they can tell us about ritual as a mode of human action. Most
anthropologists have assumed that ritual is a special kind of happening. The
authors argue that we should not define ritual as a distinct type of event but
instead look at ritualization, which is a modification of action. What is
distinctive about actions which are ritualized? This book proposes a new theory
to analyse the qualities which ritualization gives to a wide and disparate
range of actions and events. The authors reject the common view that ritual
carries intrinsic meaning, and stress the reasons why participants may or may
not give meaning to ritual acts. They draw on insights from the philosophy of
action, cognitive psychology, and phenomenology, to explore the paradox that in
ritual, actors both are and are not the authors of their acts. The book
explores the implications for anthropology of this new theory of ritual, with
discussions of the relation between texts and action, the importance of bodily
experience in ritual enactment, and the sense of selfhood as it is affected by
ritual.&quot;]
	&lt;li&gt;E. Thomas Lawson and Robert N. McCauley, &lt;cite&gt;Rethinking Religion:
Connecting Cognition and Culture&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;I. M. Lewis, &lt;cite&gt;Religion in Context: Cults and Charisma&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Robert N. McCauley and E. Thomas Lawson, &lt;cite&gt;Bringing Ritual to
Mind&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Ara Norenzayan and Azim F. Shariff, &quot;The Origin and Evolution
of Religious Prosociality&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1158757/&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Science&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;332&lt;/strong&gt; (2008):
58--62&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Martin Riesebrodt, &lt;cite&gt;The Promise of Salvation: A Theory of
Religion&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.press.uchicago.edu/presssite/metadata.epl?mode=synopsis&amp;bookkey=6064153&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Todd Tremlin, &lt;cite&gt;Minds and Gods: The Cognitive
Foundations of Religion&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Yi-Fu Tuan, &lt;cite&gt;Religion: From Place to Placelessness&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.press.uchicago.edu/presssite/metadata.epl?mode=synopsis&amp;bookkey=6954287&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;D. Jason Slone, &lt;cite&gt;Theological Incorrectness: Why Religious People Believe What They Shouldn't&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Harvey Whitehouse
       		  &lt;ul&gt;
		  &lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Arguments and Icons: Divergent Modes of
Religiosity&lt;/cite&gt;
		  &lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Inside the Cult: Religious Innovation and
Transmission in Papua New Guinea&lt;/cite&gt; [&quot;For the past thirty years, adherents
of the millenarian cult of the Pomio Kivung in Papua New Guinea have been
awaiting the establishment of a period of supernatural bliss, heralded by the
return of their ancestors bearing 'cargo'. The author of this book, Harvey
Whitehouse, was taken for a reincarnated ancestor, and was thus able to observe
the dynamics of the cult from within. From the stable mainstream of the cult,
localized splinter groups periodically emerge, hoping to expedite the
millennium; the core of this volume concerns the close study of one such group
in two Baining villages. The two aspects of the cult studied here - on the one
hand a large, uniform, and stable mainstream organization with a well-defined
hierarchy demanding orthodoxy of views, and on the other hand a small-scale and
temporary movement, emotional and innovative in its views - stand in sharp
contrast one to the other, but are here seen as divergent modes of the same
process, implemented in differing ways. This original theory of 'modes of
religiosity' which Whitehouse here develops draws on recent findings in
cognitive psychology to link styles of codification and cultural transmission
to the political scale, structure, and ethos of religious communities.&quot;]
		  &lt;/ul&gt;
       &lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
