<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- name="generator" content="blosxom/2.0" -->
<!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN" "http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd">

<rss version="0.91">
  <channel>
    <title>Notebooks   </title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks</link>
    <description>Cosma's Notebooks</description>
    <language>en</language>

  <item>
    <title>Scientific Thinking</title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks/2011/07/14#scientific-thinking</link>
    <description>
&lt;P&gt;How do scientists &lt;em&gt;actually&lt;/em&gt; think?  I mean, when they are doing
science, as opposed to going about daily life like anyone else, or for that
matter scheming to get their grant proposals funded.  (&lt;em&gt;Do&lt;/em&gt; they go
about daily life like everyone else?  If not, is it because scientific thinking
spreads into other domains, or because they start out weird, or what?)  How do
they come to think that way?  How closely does scientific thinking conform to
what theories of &lt;a href=&quot;scientific-method.html&quot;&gt;scientific method&lt;/a&gt; says it
should be, and do the discrepancies matter?

&lt;P&gt;See also:
	&lt;a href=&quot;analogy.html&quot;&gt;Analogy and Metaphor&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;cognitive-science.html&quot;&gt;Cognitive Science&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;collective-cognition.html&quot;&gt;Collective Cognition&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;imagination.html&quot;&gt;Imagination and Creativity&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;learning-inference-induction.html&quot;&gt;Machine Learning, Statistical Inference and Induction&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;sociology-of-science.html&quot;&gt;Sociology of Science&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;thought-and-society.html&quot;&gt;Thought and Society&lt;/a&gt;


&lt;ul&gt;Recommended:
	&lt;li&gt;K. Anders Ericsson, Ralf Th. Krampe and Clemens Tesch-Romer, &quot;The
Role of Deliberate Practice in the Acquisition of Expert
Performance&quot;, &lt;citE&gt;Psychological Review&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;100&lt;/strong&gt; (1993):
363--406
	&lt;li&gt;Margaret Boden, &lt;cite&gt;The Creative Mind: Myths and
Mechanisms&lt;/cite&gt; [How and when to change the kind of representation you're
using.
&lt;A href=&quot;http://www.bbsonline.org/documents/a/00/00/04/34/&quot;&gt;Precis&lt;/a&gt; by
Prof. Boden.]
	&lt;li&gt;Ronald N. Giere, &lt;cite&gt;Explaining Science: A Cognitive
Approach&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;john-holland.html&quot;&gt;John H. Holland&lt;/a&gt;, Keith J. Holyoak,
Richard E. Nisbett, and Paul R. Thagard, &lt;cite&gt;Induction: Process of
Inference, Learning and Discovery&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;../reviews/hhnt-induction/&quot;&gt;Review: The Best-Laid Schemes o' Mice an'
Men&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;../Medawar&quot;&gt;Peter Medawar&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;cite&gt;Induction and
Intuition in Scientific Thought&lt;/cite&gt; [collected in &lt;cite&gt;Pluto's
Republic&lt;/cite&gt;]
	&lt;/ul&gt;


&lt;ul&gt;To read:
	&lt;li&gt;Scott Atran and Douglas Medin, &lt;cite&gt;The Native Mind and
the Cultural Construction of Nature&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://mitpress.mit.edu/978-0-262-13489-7&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;William Bechtel and Robert C. Richardson, &lt;cite&gt;Discovering
Complexity: Decomposition and Localization as Strategies in Scientific
Research&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;A href=&quot;http://pup.princeton.edu/titles/4971.html&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Peter Carruthers, Stephen Stich and 
Michael Siegal (eds.), &lt;cite&gt;The Cognitive Basis of Science&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/9780521812290&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Aidan Feeney and Evan Heit (eds.), &lt;cite&gt;Inductive Reasoning:
Cognitive, Mathematical, and Neuroscientific Approaches&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/0521672449&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/A&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Jacques Hadamard, &lt;cite&gt;The Psychology of Creativity in the Mathematical Field&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.bams/1183507766&quot;&gt;Review&lt;/a&gt; by &lt;a href=&quot;barzun.html&quot;&gt;Jacques Barzun&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;David Klahr (with Kevin Dunbar, Anne L. Fay, David Penner and
Christian D. Schunn), &lt;cite&gt;Exploring Science: The Cognition and Development of
Discovery Processes&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262611763&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Barbara Koslowski, &lt;cite&gt;Theory and Evidence: The Development of
Scientific Reasoning&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262512794&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Nancy Nersessian, &lt;cite&gt;Creating Scientific Concepts&lt;/citE&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://mitpress.mit.edu/978-0-262-14105-5&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Lisa M. Osbeck, Nancy J. Nersessian, Kareen R. Malone, and Wendy C. Newstetter, &lt;cite&gt;Science as Psychology: Sense-Making and Identity in
Science Practice&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/9780521882071&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1207754&quot;&gt;review&lt;/a&gt; by Ronald Giere makes it sound more useful as source
material than for insights]
	&lt;li&gt;Fenna H. Poletiek, &lt;cite&gt;Hypothesis Testing Behaviour&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://users.fmg.uva.nl/dborsboom/borsboomPoletiek2001.pdf&quot;&gt;Review by
Denny Borsboom&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Frederick Reif, &lt;cite&gt;Applying Cognitive Science to Education: Thinking and Learning in Scientific and Other Complex Domains&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262515146&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Robert Scott Root-Bernstein, &lt;cite&gt;Discovering: Inventing and
Solving Problems at the Frontiers of Scientific Knowledge&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.hup.harvard.edu/Web_Backlist/Backlist_Categ/Discovering.html&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;simon.html&quot;&gt;H. A. Simon&lt;/a&gt;, P. Langley, G. L. Bradshaw and J. Zytkow, &lt;cite&gt;Scientific Discovery: Computational Explorations of
the Creative Process&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
