<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- name="generator" content="blosxom/2.0" -->
<!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN" "http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd">

<rss version="0.91">
  <channel>
    <title>Notebooks   </title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks</link>
    <description>Cosma's Notebooks</description>
    <language>en</language>

  <item>
    <title>Methodology for the Social Sciences</title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks/2011/12/11#social-science-methodology</link>
    <description>
&lt;P&gt;That is: what are the appropriate methods for studying social or cultural
phenomena in a scientific way?  In principle, this is a sub-division of
general &lt;a href=&quot;scientific-method.html&quot;&gt;scientific methodology&lt;/a&gt;, but
arguably (this is one of the big questions here!) social phenomena are
sufficiently different from natural ones that they need truly distinctive
methods.  (Or perhaps social phenomena can be studied with the same methods as
biological ones, but both are distinctive from inorganic nature.)  It seems to
be true that &lt;em&gt;how&lt;/em&gt; one should study society depends on &lt;em&gt;what society
is like&lt;/em&gt;, i.e., general issues of &lt;a href=&quot;sociology.html&quot;&gt;social
theory&lt;/a&gt;.  But my hope is to learn something about methods which
are &lt;em&gt;relatively&lt;/em&gt; agnostic about social ontology, because they'd work
even under very different assumptuions about the nature of society.

&lt;P&gt;It's probably a bad thing that so many of my favorite works in this genre
are relentlessly negative.

&lt;P&gt;See also:
	&lt;a href=&quot;agent-based-modeling.html&quot;&gt;Agent-Based Modeling&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;archaeology.html&quot;&gt;Archaeology&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;economics.html&quot;&gt;Economics&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;historical-materialism.html&quot;&gt;Historical Materialism&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;history.html&quot;&gt;Historiography&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;network-data-analysis.html&quot;&gt;Network Data Analysis&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;scientific-method.html&quot;&gt;Scientific Method and Philosophy of Science&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;sociology.html&quot;&gt;Sociology&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;statistics.html&quot;&gt;Statistics&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;Recommended whole-heartedly:
	&lt;li&gt;Stanislav Andreski
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Elements of Comparative Sociology&lt;/citE&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Social Science as Sorcery&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Jon Elster
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;Excessive
Ambitions&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.2202/1932-0213.1055&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Capitalism
and Society&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;4:2&lt;/strong&gt; (2009): 1&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;Marxism, Functionalism and Game Theory: The Case for
Methodological Individualism,&quot; &lt;cite&gt;Theory and Society&lt;/cite&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;11&lt;/strong&gt; (1982): 453--482
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jstor.org/pss/657101&quot;&gt;JSTOR&lt;/a&gt;]
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;A Plea for Mechanisms&quot;, in Hedstrom and Swedberg
(eds.), &lt;cite&gt;Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Peter Hedstrom, &lt;cite&gt;Dissecting the Social: On the Principles of
Analytical Sociology&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/0521796679&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;ibn-khaldun.html&quot;&gt;ibn Khald&amp;ucirc;n&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Charles E. Lindblom and David K. Cohen, &lt;cite&gt;Usable Knowledge:
Social Science and Social Problem Solving&lt;/cite&gt; [Why social science will
almost never be able to acheive the kind of rational authority that the natural
sciences possess, and some suggestions about how social scientists might
instead direct their efforts so as to be useful in solving social problems.  &lt;a href=&quot;.../weblog/algae-2008-07.html#usable-knowledge&quot;&gt;Mini-review&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;popper.html&quot;&gt;Karl R. Popper&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;cite&gt;The Poverty of Historicism&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Ole Rogeberg and Hans Olav Melberg, &quot;Acceptance of unsupported
claims about reality: a blind spot in
economics&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2011.556817&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Journal
of Economic Methodology&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;18&lt;/strong&gt; (2011): 29--52&lt;/a&gt; [By no
means is the problem described here limited to economics, though economists may
be unusually blind to it, owing to the entirely malign and unwarranted
influence of Milton Friedman. &lt;a href=&quot;http://freakynomics.blogspot.com/2011/06/flaw-in-modern-economics-and-how-to-fix.html&quot;&gt;See also&lt;a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;W. G. Runciman, &lt;cite&gt;A Treatise on Social Theory&lt;/cite&gt; [This is
a trilogy, of which I've finished the first, methodological volume...]
	&lt;li&gt;John R. Sutton, &lt;cite&gt;Marshall's Tendencies: What Economists Can
Know&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Charles Tilly
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;Many of Tilly's methodological papers are &lt;a href=&quot;http://professor-murmann.info/index.php/weblog/tilly&quot;&gt;available online&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Big Structures, Large Processes, Huge
Comparisons&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;../weblog/algae-2008-07.html#big-structures&quot;&gt;Mini-review&lt;/a&gt;]
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Explaining Social Processes&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;../weblog/algae-2010-05.html#tilly&quot;&gt;Mini-review&lt;/a&gt;]
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;Recommended half-heartedly:
	&lt;li&gt;Stanley Lieberson and Freda B. Lynn, &quot;Barking Up the Wrong Branch:
Scientific Alternatives to the Current Model Sociological
Science,&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141122&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Annual
Review of Sociology&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;28&lt;/strong&gt; (2002): 1--19&lt;/a&gt; [I'm sympathetic, but would
offer the correction that even what sociologists &lt;em&gt;try&lt;/em&gt; to do isn't like
classical physics &lt;em&gt;at all&lt;/em&gt;, though it may be like what they imagine
physics to be.  Also, &lt;em&gt;a lot&lt;/em&gt; of this is very similar to
what &lt;a href=&quot;popper.html&quot;&gt;Popper&lt;/a&gt; said in &lt;cite&gt;The Poverty of
Historicism&lt;/cite&gt;.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/soc/faculty/lieberson/Barking.pdf&quot;&gt;PDF reprint&lt;/a&gt; via Prof. Lieberson.]
	&lt;li&gt;Stanley Lieberson and Joel Horwich, &quot;Implication Analysis: A
Pragmatic Proposal for Linking Theory and Data in the Social
Sciences&quot;, &lt;cite&gt;Sociological Metholodgy&lt;/citE&gt; &lt;strong&gt;38&lt;/strong&gt; (2008):
1--50, with discussions and replies, pp. 51--100
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/soc/faculty/lieberson/implications.pdf&quot;&gt;PDF&lt;/a&gt;
via Prof. Lieberson.  These are all reasonable bits of advice, but I alternated
between thinking &quot;This needs saying?!?&quot; and &quot;Sadly, this needs saying&quot;.  The
best short summary is provided by Mizruchi on p. 68; this makes it clear that
it is far too shapeless to count as a &lt;em&gt;method&lt;/em&gt; of analysis.
(Unfortunately Mizruchi goes on to rather spoil the effect by showing (p. 70)
that either he has no conception of what it means to compare alternative
explanations, or he doesn't understand
what &lt;a href=&quot;regression.html&quot;&gt;multivariate regression&lt;/a&gt; does, or perhaps
both.)  One of the shrewdest comments is that by Tilly: this is obviously the
right way to go, &lt;em&gt;and&lt;/em&gt; it will involve a substantial change in how
sociologists reproduce themselves professionally.]
	&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;To read:
	&lt;li&gt;Andrew Abbott
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Chaos of Disciplines&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.press.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/hfs.cgi/00/14106.ctl&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;citE&gt;Methods of Discovery: Heuristics for
the Social Sciences&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Eckhart Arnold, &quot;Tools of Toys? On Specific Challenges for Modeling
and the Epistemology of Models and Computer Simulations in the Social Sciences&quot;,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00005424/&quot;&gt;phil-sci/5424&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Raymond Boudon
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;Beyond Rational Choice Theory&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100213&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Annual
Review of Sociology&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;29&lt;/strong&gt; (2003): 1--21&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;The Crisis in Sociology&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;The Logic of Sociological Explanation&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;James S. Coleman, &lt;cite&gt;The Foundations of Social Theory&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Pierre Demeulenaere (ed.), &lt;cite&gt;Analytical sociology and social mechanisms&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Jared Diamond and James A. Robinson (eds.), &lt;cite&gt;Natural
Experiments of History&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog/DIANAT.html&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Jon Elster, &lt;cite&gt;Explaining Social Behavior: More Nuts and Bolts for
the Social Sciences&lt;/cite&gt; [2nd edition of &lt;cite&gt;Nuts and Bolts&lt;/cite&gt;,
much-expanded; apparently much less
rational-choicy.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/9780521777445&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Roberto Franzosi, &lt;cite&gt;From Words to Numbers: A Journey in the
Methodology of the Social Sciences&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/052154145X&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;.  I heard Franzosi talk
about this at the quantitative methodology seminar at Ann Arbor, Sept. 2004,
and was very impressed, but I haven't gotten around to reading the book.]
	&lt;li&gt;Neil Gross, &quot;Charles Tilly and American Pragmatism&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12108-010-9110-1&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;The American Sociologist&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;41&lt;/strong&gt; (2010): 337--357&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;John R. Hall, &lt;cite&gt;Cultures of Inquiry: From Epistemology to Discourse in Sociohistorical Research&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/9780521659888&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Eszter Hargittai (ed.), &lt;cite&gt;Research Confidential: Solutions to
Problems Most Social Scientists Pretend They Never Have&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rconfidential.com/&quot;&gt;Website&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Goeffrey Hawthorn, &lt;cite&gt;Plausible Worlds: Possibility and
Understanding in History and the Social Sciences&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/0521457769&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Jeffrey Haydu, &quot;Reversals of fortune: path dependency,
problem solving, and temporal cases&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11186-009-9098-0&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Theory and Society&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;39&lt;/strong&gt; (2010):
25--48&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Peter Hedstrom an Peter Bearman (eds.), &lt;cite&gt;The Oxford Handbook of
Analytical Sociology&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;David K. Henderson, &lt;cite&gt;Interpretation and Explanation in the
Human Sciences&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Donald W. Katzner, &lt;cite&gt;Analysis without Measurement&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/9780521102902&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Gary King et al., &lt;cite&gt;Designing Social Inquiry&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Erin Leahey, &quot;Methodological Memes and Mores: Toward a Sociology of
Social
Research&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134731&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Annual
Review of Sociology&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;34&lt;/strong&gt; (2008): 33--53&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/soc/faculty/lieberson/&quot;&gt;Stanley
Lieberson&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;cite&gt;Making It Count: The Improvement of Social Research
and Theory&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Charles Lindblom, &lt;citE&gt;Inquiry and Change&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Kristin Luker, &lt;cite&gt;Salsa Dancing into the Social Sciences: Research in an Age of Info-glut&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog/LUKSAL.html&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;John Levi Martin, &lt;cite&gt;The Explanation of Social Action&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Merton, &lt;cite&gt;Social Theory and Social Structure&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;D. C.  Phillips, &lt;cite&gt;Holistic Thought in Social Science&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Amy R. Poteete, Marco A. Janssen and Elinor Ostrom, &lt;cite&gt;Working Together:
Collective Action, the Commons, and Multiple Methods in Practice&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://press.princeton.edu/titles/9209.html&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Charles C. Ragin, &lt;cite&gt;The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond
Qualtiative and Quantitative Strategies&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Dan Sperber, &quot;A naturalistic ontology for mechanistic explanations
in the social sciences&quot; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dan.sperber.fr/?p=751&quot;&gt;online&lt;/A&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Arthur Stinchcombe
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Constructing Social Theories&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;The Conditions of Fruitfulness of Theorizing About
Mechanisms in Social Science&quot;, &lt;cite&gt;Philosophy of Social Science&lt;/cite&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;21&lt;/strong&gt; (1991): 367--388
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Charles Tilly
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;Mechanisms and Political Processes&quot;, &lt;cite&gt;Annual
Review of Political Science&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;4&lt;/strong&gt; (2001)
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;Micro, Macro, or Megrim?&quot; [Which I somehow have as a PDF
preprint, &quot;Columbia University, August 1997&quot;]
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
