<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- name="generator" content="blosxom/2.0" -->
<!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN" "http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd">

<rss version="0.91">
  <channel>
    <title>Notebooks   </title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks</link>
    <description>Cosma's Notebooks</description>
    <language>en</language>

  <item>
    <title>Methodology for the Social Sciences</title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks/2010/01/04#social-science-methodology</link>
    <description>
&lt;P&gt;That is: what are the appropriate methods for studying social or cultural
phenomena in a scientific way?  In principle, this is a sub-division of
general &lt;a href=&quot;scientific-method.html&quot;&gt;scientific methodology&lt;/a&gt;, but
arguably (this is one of the big questions here!) social phenomena are
sufficiently different from natural ones that they need truly distinctive
methods.  (Or perhaps social phenomena can be studied with the same methods as
biological ones, but both are distinctive from inorganic nature.)  It seems to
be true that &lt;em&gt;how&lt;/em&gt; one should study society depends on &lt;em&gt;what society
is like&lt;/em&gt;, i.e., general issues of &lt;a href=&quot;sociology.html&quot;&gt;social
theory&lt;/a&gt;.  But my hope is to learn something about methods which
are &lt;em&gt;relatively&lt;/em&gt; agnostic about social ontology, because they'd work
even under very different assumptuions about the nature of society.

&lt;P&gt;It's probably a bad thing that so many of my favorite works in this genre
are relentlessly negative.

&lt;P&gt;See also:
	&lt;a href=&quot;agent-based-modeling.html&quot;&gt;Agent-Based Modeling&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;archaeology.html&quot;&gt;Archaeology&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;economics.html&quot;&gt;Economics&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;historical-materialism.html&quot;&gt;Historical Materialism&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;network-data-analysis.html&quot;&gt;Network Data Analysis&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;scientific-method.html&quot;&gt;Scientific Method and Philosophy of Science&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;sociology.html&quot;&gt;Sociology&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;statistics.html&quot;&gt;Statistics&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;Recommended:
	&lt;li&gt;Stanislav Andreski
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Elements of Comparative Sociology&lt;/citE&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Social Science as Sorcery&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Jon Elster
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;Excessive
Ambitions&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.2202/1932-0213.1055&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Capitalism
and Society&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;4:2&lt;/strong&gt; (2009): 1&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Peter Hedstrom, &lt;cite&gt;Dissecting the Social: On the Principles of
Analytical Sociology&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/0521796679&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Charles E. Lindblom and David K. Cohen, &lt;cite&gt;Usable Knowledge:
Social Science and Social Problem solving&lt;/cite&gt; [Why social science will
almost never be able to acheive the kind of rational authority that the natural
sciences possess, and some suggestions about how social scientists might
instead direct their efforts so as to be useful in solving social problems.  &lt;a href=&quot;.../weblog/algae-2008-07.html#usable-knowledge&quot;&gt;Mini-review&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;popper.html&quot;&gt;Karl R. Popper&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;cite&gt;The Poverty of Historicism&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;W. G. Runciman, &lt;cite&gt;A Treatise on Social Theory&lt;/cite&gt; [This is
a trilogy, of which I've finished the first, methodological volume...]
	&lt;li&gt;John R. Sutton, &lt;cite&gt;Marshall's Tendencies: What Economists Can
Know&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Charles Tilly, &lt;cite&gt;Big Structures, Large Processes, Huge
Comparisons&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;../weblog/algae-2008-07.html#big-structures&quot;&gt;Mini-review&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;To read:
	&lt;li&gt;Andrew Abbott
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Chaos of Disciplines&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.press.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/hfs.cgi/00/14106.ctl&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;citE&gt;Methods of Discovery: Heuristics for
the Social Sciences&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Raymond Boudon
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;Beyond Rational Choice Theory&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100213&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Annual
Review of Sociology&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;29&lt;/strong&gt; (2003): 1--21&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;The Crisis in Sociology&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;The Logic of Sociological Explanation&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;James S. Coleman, &lt;cite&gt;The Foundations of Social Theory&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Jon Elster
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;A Plea for Mechanisms&quot;, in Hedstrom and Swedberg
(eds.), &lt;cite&gt;Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.geocities.com/hmelberg/elster/ar98apfm.htm&quot;&gt;online&lt;/a&gt;]
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Explaining Social Behavior: More Nuts and Bolts for
the Social Sciences&lt;/cite&gt; [2nd edition of &lt;cite&gt;Nuts and Bolts&lt;/cite&gt;,
much-expanded; apparently much less
rational-choicy.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/9780521777445&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Roberto Franzosi, &lt;cite&gt;From Words to Numbers: A Journey in the
Methodology of the Social Sciences&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/052154145X&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;.  I heard Franzosi talk
about this at the quantitative methodology seminar at Ann Arbor, Sept. 2004,
and was very impressed, but I haven't gotten around to reading the book.]
	&lt;li&gt;John R. Hall, &lt;cite&gt;Cultures of Inquiry: From Epistemology to Discourse in Sociohistorical Research&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/9780521659888&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Eszter Hargittai (ed.), &lt;cite&gt;Research Confidential: Solutions to
Problems Most Social Scientists Pretend They Never Have&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rconfidential.com/&quot;&gt;Website&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Goeffrey Hawthorn, &lt;cite&gt;Plausible Worlds: Possibility and
Understanding in History and the Social Sciences&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/0521457769&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Jeffrey Haydu, &quot;Reversals of fortune: path dependency,
problem solving, and temporal cases&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11186-009-9098-0&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Theory and Society&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;39&lt;/strong&gt; (2010):
25--48&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;David K. Henderson, &lt;cite&gt;Interpretation and Explanation in the
Human Sciences&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Donald W. Katzner, &lt;cite&gt;Analysis without Measurement&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/9780521102902&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Gary King et al., &lt;cite&gt;Designing Social Inquiry&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/soc/faculty/lieberson/&quot;&gt;Stanley
Lieberson&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Making It Count: The Improvement of Social Research
and Theory&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;and Freda B. Lynn, &quot;Barking Up the Wrong Branch: Scientific
Alternatives to the Current Model Sociological Science,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141122&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Annual
Review of Sociology&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;28&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; [I'm sympathetic to what I
read in the abstract, but (a) what sociologists do isn't like classical physics
&lt;em&gt;at all&lt;/em&gt;, though it may be like what they imagine physics to be, and (b)
isn't this what &lt;a href=&quot;popper.html&quot;&gt;Popper&lt;/a&gt; said in &lt;cite&gt;The Poverty of
Historicism&lt;/cite&gt;?]
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Charles Lindblom, &lt;citE&gt;Inquiry and Change&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Kristin Luker, &lt;cite&gt;Salsa Dancing into the Social Sciences: Research in an Age of Info-glut&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog/LUKSAL.html&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Merton, &lt;cite&gt;Social Theory and Social Structure&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;D. C.  Phillips, &lt;cite&gt;Holistic Thought in Social Science&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Charles C. Ragin, &lt;cite&gt;The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond
Qualtiative and Quantitative Strategies&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Arthur Stinchcombe
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Constructing Social Theories&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;The Conditions of Fruitfulness of Theorizing About
Mechanisms in Social Science&quot;, &lt;cite&gt;Philosophy of Social Science&lt;/cite&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;21&lt;/strong&gt; (1991): 367--388
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Charles Tilly
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Explaining Social Processes&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.paradigmpublishers.com/books/BookDetail.aspx?productID=180354&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;Mechanisms and Political Processes&quot;, &lt;cite&gt;Annual
Review of Political Science&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;4&lt;/strong&gt; (2001)
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;Micro, Macro, or Megrim?&quot; [Which I somehow have as a PDF
preprint, &quot;Columbia University, August 1997&quot;]
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>