<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- name="generator" content="blosxom/2.0" -->
<!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN" "http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd">

<rss version="0.91">
  <channel>
    <title>Notebooks   </title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks</link>
    <description>Cosma's Notebooks</description>
    <language>en</language>

  <item>
    <title>Foundations and History of Statistical Mechanics</title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks/2011/08/27#stat-mech-foundations</link>
    <description>
&lt;P&gt;&lt;em&gt;Technical issues&lt;/em&gt;: things like, what exactly is a C* algebra?
Role of &lt;a href=&quot;large-deviations.html&quot;&gt;large deviations&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;P&gt;&lt;em&gt;Conceptual issues&lt;/em&gt;: Why is it legitimate to treat deterministic
mechanical systems with many unstable degrees of freedom
as &lt;a href=&quot;stochastic-processes.html&quot;&gt;stochastic processes&lt;/a&gt;? (My impulse is
to appeal to &lt;a href=&quot;ergodic-theory.html&quot;&gt;ergodic theory&lt;/a&gt;.)  When and why
do we get convergence to equilibria characterized by only a few macroscopic
degrees of freedom?  (That sounds like a central limit theorem, some
kind of result about how the large-scale limit is insensitive to all but a few
aspects of the small scales.)

&lt;P&gt;&lt;em&gt;Historical issues&lt;/em&gt;: It's interesting to know how people have
argued about this stuff.

&lt;P&gt;See also:
	&lt;a href=&quot;stat-mech.html&quot;&gt;Statistical Mechanics&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;noneq-sm.html&quot;&gt;Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;maxent.html&quot;&gt;Maximum Entropy&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;tsallis.html&quot;&gt;Tsallis Statistics&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;Recommended:
	&lt;li&gt;David Z. Albert, &lt;cite&gt;Time and Chance&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Jean Bricmont, &quot;Science of Chaos or Chaos in Science?&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/chao-dyn/9603009&quot;&gt;chao-dyn/9603009&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Stephen G. Brush, &quot;Foundations of Statistical Mechanics 1845--1915&quot;,
&lt;cite&gt;Archive for the History of Exact Sciences&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;4&lt;/strong&gt;
(1966): 145--183
	&lt;li&gt;E. G. D. Cohen, &quot;Entropy, Probability and Dynamics&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/0807.1268&quot;&gt;arxiv:0807.1268&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;W. De Roeck, Christian Maes and Karel Netocny, &quot;H-Theorems from
Autonomous Equations&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0508089&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0508089&lt;/a&gt;
= &lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10955-006-9079-x&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Journal of
Statistical Physics&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;123&lt;/strong&gt; (2006): 571--584&lt;/a&gt; [&quot;If
for a Hamiltonian dynamics for many particles, at all times the present
macrostate determines the future macrostate, then its entropy is non-decreasing
as a consequence of Liouville's theorem. That observation, made since long, is
here rigorously analyzed with special care to reconcile the application of
Liouville's theorem (for a finite number of particles) with the condition of
autonomous macroscopic evolution (sharp only in the limit of infinite scale
separation); and to evaluate the presumed necessity of a Markov property for
the macroscopic evolution.&quot;]
	&lt;li&gt;Richard S. Ellis, &lt;cite&gt;Entropy, Large Deviations and
Statistical Mechanics&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;A. I. Khinchin, &lt;cite&gt;Mathematical Foundations of Statistical
Mechanics&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Joel L. Lebowitz, &quot;Statistical mechanics: A selective Review of Two
Central Issues&quot;, &lt;cite&gt;Reviews of Modern Physics&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;71&lt;/strong&gt;
(1999):
S346--S357, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/0010018&quot;&gt;math-ph/0010018&lt;/a&gt;
[Abstract: &quot;I give a highly selective overview of the way statistical mechanics
explains the microscopic origins of the time-asymmetric evolution of
macroscopic systems towards equilibrium and of first-order phase transitions in
equilibrium. These phenomena are emergent collective properties not discernible
in the behavior of individual atoms. They are given precise and elegant
mathematical formulations when the ratio between macroscopic and microscopic
scales becomes very large.&quot;]
	&lt;li&gt;Michael C. Mackey, &lt;cite&gt;Time's Arrow: The Origins of Thermodynamic Behavior&lt;/cite&gt; [This is a very valuable short introduction to the
&lt;a href=&quot;ergodic-markov.html&quot;&gt;ergodic theory of Markov operators&lt;/a&gt;, which is
highly relevant to the origins of irreversibility, etc., but I don't think his
approach works, because he focuses on the &lt;em&gt;relative&lt;/em&gt; entropy
(Kullback-Leibler divergence from the invariant distribution), rather than the
Boltzmann entropy or even the Gibbs entropy.]
	&lt;li&gt;Benoit Mandelbrot, &quot;The Role of Sufficiency and of Estimation in
Thermodynamics&quot;, &lt;cite&gt;Annals of Mathematical
Statistics&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;33&lt;/strong&gt; (1962): 1021--1038  [&lt;a
href=&quot;http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0003-4851%28196209%2933%3A3%3C1021%3ATROSAO%3E2.0.CO%3B2-N&quot;&gt;JSTOR&lt;/a&gt;; &lt;a href=&quot;http://math.yale.edu/mandelbrot/web_pdfs/029sufficiencyandestimation.pdf&quot;&gt;free PDF reprint&lt;/a&gt;.
Extensive thermodynamic variables
as &lt;a href=&quot;sufficient-statistics.html&quot;&gt;sufficient statistics&lt;/a&gt; for the
conjugate intensive variables; Gibbs canonical form arising from natural
requirements on finite-dimensional sufficient statistics, which can only be
achieved for exponential families of probability distributions.  Very clever.]
	&lt;li&gt;Sandu Popescu, Anthony J. Short, and Andreas Winter, &quot;Entanglement
and the Foundations of Statistical Mechanics&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0511225&quot;&gt;quant-ph/0511225&lt;/a&gt; [Roughly
speaking: due to environmental entanglement, most states of a sub-system look
&quot;thermalized&quot;, no matter what the real state of the whole system is]
	&lt;li&gt;Hans Reichenbach, &lt;citE&gt;The Direction of Time&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;../weblog/algae-2009-12.html#reichenbach&quot;&gt;Comments&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Steven Savitt (ed.), &lt;cite&gt;Time's Arrows Today: Recent Physical and
Philosophical Work on the Direction of Time&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Geoffrey Sewell
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Quantum Mechanics and Its Emergent
Macrophysics&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://press.princeton.edu/titles/7433.html&quot;&gt;blurb, ch. 1&lt;/a&gt;]
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;On the Question of Temperature Transformations under
Lorentz and Galilei
Boosts&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/0808.0803&quot;&gt;arxiv:0808.0803&lt;/a&gt;
[Punch-line: &quot;there is no law of temperature transformation under either
Lorentz or Galilei boosts, and so the concept of temperature stemming from the
Zeroth Law is restricted to states of bodies in their rest frames.&quot;]
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Lawrence Sklar, &lt;cite&gt;Physics and Chance: Philosophical Issues in
the Foundations of Statistical Mechanics&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Eric Smith, &quot;Large-deviation principles, stochastic effective
actions, path entropies, and the structure and meaning of thermodynamic
descriptions&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/1102.3938&quot;&gt;arxiv:1102.3938&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Hugo Touchette, &quot;The Large Deviations Approach to Statistical
Mechanics&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/0804.0327&quot;&gt;arxiv:0804.0327&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;W. H. Zurek, &quot;Algorithmic Randomness, Physical Entropy,
Measurements, and the Demon of Choice,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9807007&quot;&gt;quant-ph/9807007&lt;/a&gt;
	  &lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;Modesty forbids:
	&lt;li&gt;CRS and Cristopher Moore, &quot;What Is a Macrotate?&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0303625&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0303625&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;/ul&gt;


&lt;ul&gt;To read:
	&lt;li&gt;Walid K. Abou Salem and J&amp;uuml;rg Fr&amp;ouml;hlich, &quot;Status of the
Fundamental Laws of Thermodynamics&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10955-006-9222-8&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Journal of Statistical
Physics&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;126&lt;/strong&gt; (2007): 1045-1068&lt;/a&gt; [&quot;We describe recent
progress towards deriving the Fundamental Laws of thermodynamics (the 0th, 1st,
and 2nd Law) from nonequilibrium quantum statistical mechanics in simple, yet
physically relevant models.&quot;]
	&lt;li&gt;A. E. Allahverdyan and Th. M. Nieuwenhuizen, &quot;Explanation of the
Gibbs paradox within the framework of quantum thermodynamics&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.73.066119&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Physical Review
E&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;73&lt;/strong&gt; (2006): 066119&lt;/a&gt;
= &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0507145&quot;&gt;quant-ph/0507145&lt;/a&gt; [The
abstract says many things with which I am sympathetic, most notably coming out
against &quot;a direct association of physical irreversibility with lack of
information&quot;, but I don't know if I'll ever find time to read this...]
	&lt;li&gt;Massimiliano Badino
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;The Foundational Role of Ergodic Theory&quot;,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00002277/&quot;&gt;phil-sci/2277&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;Probability and Statistics in Boltzmann's Early Papers on
Kinetic Theory&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00002276/&quot;&gt;phil-sci/2276&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;Was there a statistical Turn? The Interaction between
Mechanics and Probability in Boltzmann's Theory of Non Equilibrium (1872-1877)&quot;,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00002878/&quot;&gt;phil-sci/2878&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Robert W. Batterman, &quot;Why Equilibrium Statistical Mechanics Works:
Universality and the Renormalization Group&quot;, &lt;cite&gt;Philosopy of
Science&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;65&lt;/strong&gt; (1998): 183--208
[&lt;a
href=&quot;http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0031-8248%28199806%2965%3A2%3C183%3AWESMWU%3E2.0.CO%3B2-%23&quot;&gt;JSTOR&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Battimelli &lt;em&gt;et al.,&lt;/em&gt; (eds.), &lt;cite&gt;Proceedings of the Int'l
Symposium on Ludwig Boltzmann&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Joseph Berkovitz, Roman Frigg and Fred Kronz, &quot;The Ergodic
Hierarchy, Randomness and Hamiltonian Chaos&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00002927/&quot;&gt;phil-sci/2927&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Ludwig Boltzmann, &lt;cite&gt;Lectures on Gas Theory&lt;/cite&gt; [Get the
Dover reprint]
	&lt;li&gt;Michele Campisi, &quot;Mechanical Proof of the Second Law of
Thermodynamics Based on Volume
Entropy&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/0704.2567&quot;&gt;arxiv:0704.2567&lt;/a&gt; [i.e.,
Boltzmann entropy]
	&lt;li&gt;Michele Campisi and Donald H. Kobe, &quot;Derivation of Boltzmann
Principle&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/0911.2070&quot;&gt;arxiv:0911.2070&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Miguel Carrion-Alvarez, &quot;Variations on a theme of Gelfand and
Naimark&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.FA/0402150&quot;&gt;math.FA/0402150&lt;/a&gt;
[Algebras of observables, including C* algebras as a special case]
	&lt;li&gt;P. Castiglione, M. Falcioni, A. Lesne and A. Vulpiani,
&lt;cite&gt;Chaos and Coarse Graining in Statistical Mechanics&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a
href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/9780521895934&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10955-009-9712-6&quot;&gt;Review in
J. Stat. Phys.&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Hasok Chang, &lt;citE&gt;Inventing Temperature: Measurement
and Scientific Progress&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Marius Costeniuc, Richard S. Ellis, Hugo Touchette and Bruce
Turkington, &quot;The Generalized Canonical Ensemble and Its Universal Equivalence
with the Microcanonical Ensemble&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10955-005-4407-0&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Journal of Statistical
Physics&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;119&lt;/strong&gt; (2005): 1283--1329&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Stefano Curtarolo and Gerbrand Ceder, &quot;Dynamic of a non
homogeneously coarse grained system,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0106263&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0106263&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;N. D. Hari Dass, S. Kalyana Rama and B. Sathiapalan, &quot;On the
Emergence of the Microcanonical Description from a Pure State,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0112439&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0112439&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Kevin Davey, &quot;What Is Gibbs's Canonical Distribution?&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/4282/&quot;&gt;phil-sci/4282&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Paul and Tatiana Ehrenfest, &lt;cite&gt;The Conceptual Foundations of the
Statistical Approach in Mechanics&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Richard S. Ellis, Kyle Haven and Bruce Turkington, &quot;The Large
Deviation Principle for Coarse-Grained Processes,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/0012023&quot;&gt;math-ph/0012023&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Denis J. Evans, Debra J. Searles, Stephen R. Williams, &quot;A simple mathematical proof of Boltzmann's equal a priori probability hypothesis&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/0903.1480&quot;&gt;arxiv:0903.1480&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Roman Frigg, &quot;Probability in Boltzmannian Statistical
Mechanics&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00003489/&quot;&gt;phil-sci/3489&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Alexandre Giraud and Julien Serreau, &quot;Decoherence and
Thermalization of a Pure Quantum State in Quantum Field
Theory&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.230405&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Physical
Review Letters&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;104&lt;/strong&gt; (2010): 230405&lt;/a&gt; [&quot;real-time
evolution of a self-interacting O(N) scalar field initially prepared in a pure,
coherent quantum state. ... nonequilibrium quantum dynamics from a 1/N
expansion of the two-particle-irreducible effective action at next-to-leading
order, which includes scattering and memory effects. ... restricting one's
attention (or ability to measure) to a subset of the infinite hierarchy of
correlation functions, one observes an effective loss of purity or coherence
and, on longer time scales, thermalization. .... physics of decoherence is well
described by classical statistical field theory.&quot;]
	&lt;li&gt;Sheldon Goldstein, &quot;Boltzmann's Approach to Statistical
Mechanics,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0105242&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0105242&lt;/a&gt; [&quot;most
twentieth-century innovations are thoroughly misguided&quot;]
	&lt;li&gt;Sheldon Goldstein, Joel L. Lebowitz, Roderich Tumulka, and Nino
Zanghi, &quot;Canonical
Typicality&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.050403&quot;&gt;Physical
Review Letters&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;96&lt;/strong&gt; (2006): 050403&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;H. Grad, &quot;The many faces of entropy&quot;, &lt;cite&gt;Communications on Pure
and Applied Mathematics&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;14&lt;/strong&gt; (1961): 323--354 [Apparently
makes the point that the correct entropy function is dependent on the level of
description.  This is important for revising my paper with Cris Moore...]
	&lt;li&gt;A. Greven, G. Keller and G. Warnecke (eds.), &lt;cite&gt;Entropy&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;D. H. E. Gross
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;Geometric Foundation of Thermo-Statistics, Phase
Transitions, Second Law of Thermodynamics, but without Thermodynamic Limit,&quot;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0201235&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0201235&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;The microcanonical entropy is multiply differentiable. No
dinosaurs in microcanonical gravitation: No special 'microcanonical phase
transitions',&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0403582&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0403582&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;On the Microscopic Foundation of Thermo-Statistics,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0209482&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0209482&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;A New Thermodynamics,From Nuclei to Stars,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0302267&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0302267&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;Second Law of Thermodynamics, Macroscopic Observables
within Boltzmann's Principle but without Thermodynamic Limit,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0101281&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0101281&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;Thermo-Statistics or Topology of the Microcanonical
Entropy Surface,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0206341&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0206341&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Meir Hemmo and Orly Shenker, &quot;Quantum Decoherence and the Approach
to Equilibrium&quot;, &lt;cite&gt;Philosophy of Science&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;70&lt;/strong&gt; (2003):
330--358
	&lt;li&gt;Steven Huntsman, &quot;Effective statistical physics of Anosov systems&quot;,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/1009.2127&quot;&gt;arxiv:1009.2127&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Dragi Karevski, &quot;Foundations of Statistical Mechanics: in and out
of Equilibrium&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0509595&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0509595&lt;/a&gt; [&quot;The first
part of the paper is devoted to the foundations, that is the mathematical and
physical justification, of equilibrium statistical mechanics. It is a
pedagogical attempt, mostly based on Khinchin's presentation, which purpose is
to clarify some aspects of the development of statistical mechanics. In the
second part, we discuss some recent developments that appeared out of
equilibrium, such as fluctuation theorem and Jarzynski equality.&quot;]
	&lt;li&gt;Gerhard Keller, &lt;cite&gt;Equilibrium States in Ergodic Theory&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/9780521595346&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Martin Krieger, &lt;cite&gt;Constitutions of Matter: Mathematically
Modeling the Most Everyday of Physical Phenomena&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Juraj Kumicak, &quot;Irreversibility in a simple reversible
model&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.71.016115&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Physical
Review E&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;71&lt;/strong&gt; (2005): 016115&lt;/a&gt;
= &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/nlin.CD/0510016&quot;&gt;nlin.CD/0510016&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;David A. Lavis
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;The spin-echo system
reconsidered&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0311527&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0311527&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;Is Equilibrium a Useful Concept in Statistical
Mechanics?&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0401061&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0401061&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;Boltzmann, Gibbs and the Concept of Equilibrium&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/0710.2052&quot;&gt;arxiv:0710.2052&lt;/a&gt; = &lt;a href=&quot;http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/3595/&quot;&gt;phil-sci/3595&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Chuang Liu, &quot;Approximations, Idealizations, and Models in
Statistical Mechanics,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/documents/disk0/00/00/03/65/index.html&quot;&gt;PITT-PHIL-SCI00000365&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;A. Majda, I. Timofeyev and E. Vanden-Eijnden, &quot;Stochastic models for selected slow variables in large deterministic systems&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0951-7715/19/4/001&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Nonlinearity&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;19&lt;/strong&gt; (2006): 769&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Benoit Mandelbrot, &quot;On the Derivation of Statistical Thermodynamics
from Purely Phenomenological Principles&quot;, &lt;cite&gt;Journal of Mathematical
Physics&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;5&lt;/strong&gt; (1964): 164--171 [&lt;a href=&quot;http://math.yale.edu/mandelbrot/web_pdfs/034statisticalthermodynamics.pdf&quot;&gt;PDF reprint&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;St&amp;eacute;phane Mischler, Cl&amp;eacute;ment Mouhot, &quot;Kac's Program in Kinetic Theory&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/1107.3251&quot;&gt;arxiv:1107.3251&lt;/a&gt; [&quot;his paper is devoted to the study of propagation of chaos and mean-field limit for systems of indistinguable particles undergoing collision processes, as formulated by M. Kac (1956)...&quot;]
	&lt;li&gt;Jill North, &quot;An Empirical Approach to Symmetry and Probability&quot;,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00005192/&quot;&gt;phil-sci/5192&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Oliver Penrose, &lt;cite&gt;Foundations of Statistical Mechanics: A
Deductive Treatment&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://store.doverpublications.com/0486438708.html&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;A. Perez-Madrid, &quot;Gibbs Entropy and Irreversibility&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0401532&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0401532&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;E. A. J. F. Peters, &quot;Projection operator formalism and entropy&quot;,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0703672&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0703672&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Denes Petz, &quot;Entropy, von Neumann and the von Neumann Entropy,&quot;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/0102013&quot;&gt;math-ph/0102013&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Peter Reimann
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;Foundation of Statistical Mechanics under
Experimentally Realistic
Conditions&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.190403&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Physical Review
Letters&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;101&lt;/strong&gt; (2008): 190403&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;Typicality for Generalized Microcanonical Ensembles&quot;,
&lt;cite&gt;Physical Review Letters&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;99&lt;/strong&gt; (2007): 160404,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/0710.4214&quot;&gt;arxiv:0710.4214&lt;/a&gt; [&quot;For a macroscopic, isolated quantum system in an unknown pure state, the expectation value of any given observable is shown to hardly deviate from the ensemble average with extremely high probability under generic equilibrium and nonequilibrium conditions. Special care is devoted to the uncontrollable microscopic details of the system state. For a subsystem weakly coupled to a large heat bath, the canonical ensemble is recovered under much more general and realistic assumptions than those implicit in the usual microcanonical description of the composite system at equilibrium.&quot;]
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;David Ruelle
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Statistical Mechanics: Rigorous Results&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Thermodynamic Formalism&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Geoffrey L. Sewell, &quot;Statistical Thermodynamics of Moving Bodies&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/0902.3881&quot;&gt;arxiv:0902.3881&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Orly R. Shenker and Meir Hemmo
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;The Von Neumann Entropy: A
Reconsideration&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00002256/&quot;&gt;phil-sci/2256&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;Von Neumann's Entropy Does Not Correspond to Thermodynamic Entropy&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00003716/&quot;&gt;phil-sci/3716&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Hal Tasaki
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;From Quantum Dynamics to the Second Law of
Thermodynamics,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0005128&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0005128&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;The second law of Thermodynamics as a theorem in quantum
mechanics,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0011321&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0011321&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;The approach to thermal equilibrium and &quot;thermodynamic normality&quot; --- An observation based on the works by Goldstein, Lebowitz, Mastrodonato, Tumulka, and Zanghi in 2009, and by von Neumann in 1929&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.5424&quot;&gt;arxiv:1003.5424&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Jos Uffink
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;Bluff Your Way in the Second Law of Thermodynamics,&quot;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0005327&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0005327&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;Insuperable difficulties: Einstein's statistical road to
molecular
physics&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2005.07.004&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Studies
in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;37&lt;/strong&gt; (2006):
36--70&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;Compendium of the foundations of classical statistical physics&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/2691/&quot;&gt;phil-sci/2691&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
