<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- name="generator" content="blosxom/2.0" -->
<!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN" "http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd">

<rss version="0.91">
  <channel>
    <title>Notebooks   </title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks</link>
    <description>Cosma's Notebooks</description>
    <language>en</language>

  <item>
    <title>Statistical Mechanics (and Condensed Matter)</title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks/2003/04/01#stat-mech</link>
    <description>

&lt;P&gt;The first mathematical, natural science of &lt;a
href=&quot;emergent-properties.html&quot;&gt;emergent properties&lt;/a&gt;.  (I hedge this way,
because one could argue that &lt;a href=&quot;economics.html&quot;&gt;economics&lt;/a&gt; and
evolutionary theory are both, also, concerned with emergent properties ---
efficient allocation, and &lt;a href=&quot;adaptation.html&quot;&gt;adaptation&lt;/a&gt; and
speciation, respectively, and they preceeded statistical mechanics.)  The heart
of the subject is figuring out what happens when vast numbers of particles
bounce around and into each other, all obeying the laws of mechanics (classical
or quantum as the case may be).

&lt;P&gt;&lt;em&gt;Things I Want to Understand
Better:&lt;/em&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;phase-transitions.html&quot;&gt;Phase transitions and critical
phenoma&lt;/a&gt;; the renormalization
group; &lt;a href=&quot;field-theory.html&quot;&gt;field-theory&lt;/a&gt;
methods; &lt;a href=&quot;noneq-sm.html&quot;&gt;what happens far from equilibrium&lt;/a&gt; (more
specifically, are there action principles or the like that govern probability
distributions of trajectories, the way thermodynamic potentials govern
equilibrium configurations); &quot;soft&quot; condensed matter; biological applications;
amorphous materials and glasses; connections between spin glasses and biology
(e.g., &lt;a
href=&quot;neural-nets.html&quot;&gt;perceptrons&lt;/a&gt;); &lt;a
href=&quot;stat-mech-foundations.html&quot;&gt;technical, conceptual and historical issues
in the foundations of statistical mechanics&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;P&gt;See also: &lt;a href=&quot;atomism.html&quot;&gt;atomism&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;cellular-automata.html&quot;&gt;cellular automata&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;chaos.html&quot;&gt;chaos and non-linear dynamics&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;complexity.html&quot;&gt;complexity&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;dissipative-structures.html&quot;&gt;dissipative structures&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;field-theory.html&quot;&gt;field theory&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;large-deviations.html&quot;&gt;large deviations&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;liquid-crystals.html&quot;&gt;liquid crystals&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;monte-carlo.html&quot;&gt;Monte Carlo&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;pattern-formation.html&quot;&gt;pattern formation&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;prigogine.html&quot;&gt;Ilya Prigogine&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;probability.html&quot;&gt;probability and statistics&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;self-organization.html&quot;&gt;self-organization&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;tsallis.html&quot;&gt;Tsallis statistics&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;turbulence.html&quot;&gt;turbulence&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Recommended:

&lt;P&gt;&amp;lt;rant&amp;gt; If a non-scientist wants to learn about some large and
important part of science, say planetary astronomy or genetics, there are
usually a handful of reliable, uncontroversial, well-written, non-technical
books about it to be found in the stores and libraries, which will convey at
least something of the field's history, problems, results and methods.  By this
point there must be dozens of good popular books written on evolution, particle
physics, cosmology, relativity and quantum mechanics, notwithstanding that the
last two are about as abstract and abstruse as science gets.  There are even
excellent popularizations of mathematics, in a continuous tradition from
E. T. Bell (if not before).  Writing popularizations is an accepted and even
encouraged activity for eminent scientists, and has been since Galileo's
&lt;cite&gt;Starry Messanger.&lt;/cite&gt; --- Popularizations are also important in the
recruitment and education of scientists, but the only one I know of who's
written on this is John Maynard Smith, in &lt;cite&gt;Did Darwin Get It Right?&lt;/cite&gt;

&lt;P&gt;A few months ago, when I was trying to explain some parts of my research to
my father, I realized I was assuming he knew what statistical mechanics was,
and something about how it worked, when in fact he did not.  My first thought
was to pass on some popular work about statistical mechanics (it's only fair;
he did it to me constantly when I was younger).  A great many thoughts later I
realized I could not think of a single one which didn't stake out some very
peculiar philosophical position, or did more than just blab about the second
law, never mind something as good as &lt;cite&gt;Einstein for Beginners&lt;/cite&gt; or
&lt;cite&gt;The First Three Minutes&lt;/cite&gt; or &lt;cite&gt;Does God Play Dice?&lt;/cite&gt;
Granted that relativity and particles and chaos are sexy, and statistical
mechanics is not, it's peculiar that there's &lt;em&gt;nothing.&lt;/em&gt; Stat. mech. is,
after all, one of the essential theories of current physics, actually used by
chemists and biologists and materials scientists, etc., the part of physics
most directly applicable to daily life (you could illustrate the core of it
with a coffee cup, and the whole with a kitchen), and bound up with deep
puzzles about why time goes the way it does.  This cries out for a remedy.

&lt;P&gt;The undergraduate textbooks on statistical mechanics, like those on most
part of physics, are by and large vile.  Kittel and Kroemer's &lt;cite&gt;Thermal
Physics&lt;/cite&gt; is however decent; if you want a quick-and-dirty guide, and can
put up with bad typesetting, try M. G. Bowler's
&lt;cite&gt;Lectures on Statistical Mechanics&lt;/cite&gt;.  There is nothing analogous to
Griffiths's books on electromagnetism, quantum mechanics and particle physics,
and if he's got time on his hands...

&lt;P&gt;Chandler's &lt;cite&gt;Introduction to Modern Statistical Mechanics&lt;/cite&gt; is
good, as is Landau and Lifshitz's &lt;cite&gt;Statistical Physics&lt;/cite&gt;; the latter
is far more comprehensive, but the former is much newer, and easier to learn
from.  Huang's &lt;cite&gt;Statistical Mechanics,&lt;/cite&gt; one of the other standard
texts, is a pedagogic horror.

&lt;P&gt;Having finished this venting of spleen, we turn to the usual list.
&amp;lt;/rant&amp;gt;

&lt;ul&gt;Recommended, less technical:
	&lt;li&gt;Vinay Ambegaokar, &lt;cite&gt;Reasoning about Luck: Probability and Its
Uses in Physics&lt;/cite&gt; [This is intended as a substitute for the usual sort of
physics-for-people-who-have-to-fill-a-distribution-requirement course, and I
think well enough of it that I'd be willing to teach it, while wild horses
couldn't get me to do the standard physics for poets, but it's not really what
I'm looking for.]
	&lt;li&gt;David Ruelle, &lt;cite&gt;Chance and Chaos&lt;/cite&gt; [Parts of this approach
what I was raving for above, but still doesn't quite hack it, since it doesn't
cover enough.]
	&lt;li&gt;Hans Christian von Baeyer, &lt;cite&gt;Maxwell's Demon: Why Warmth
Disperses and Time Passes&lt;/cite&gt; [Again, almost makes it]
	&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;Recommended, more technical:
	&lt;li&gt;Philip W. Anderson, &lt;cite&gt;Basic Notions of Condensed Matter
Physics&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Beck and Schl&amp;ouml;gl, &lt;cite&gt;Thermodynamics of Chaotic
Systems&lt;/cite&gt; [See notice under &lt;a href=&quot;chaos.html&quot;&gt;non-linear dynamics&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://britneyspears.ac/lasers.htm&quot;&gt;Britney Spears's Guide
to Semiconductor Physics&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Chaikin and Lubensky, &lt;cite&gt;Principles of Condensed Matter&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Richard S. Ellis, &lt;cite&gt;Entropy, Large Deviations and
Statistical Mechanics&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;K. H. Fischer and J. A. Hertz, &lt;cite&gt;Spin Glasses&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Dieter Forster, &lt;cite&gt;Hydrodynamic Fluctuations, Broken Symmetry,
and Correlation Functions&lt;/cite&gt; [An excellent book which looks
&lt;em&gt;horrible.&lt;/em&gt; Bless &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tug.org/&quot;&gt;Donald Knuth&lt;/a&gt; for
delivering us from type-writen equations!]
	&lt;li&gt;D. H. E. Gross, &quot;Microscopic statistical basis of classical
Thermodynamics of finite systems&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0505242&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0505242&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Meir Hemmo and Orly Shenker, &quot;Quantum Decoherence and the Approach
to Equilibrium&quot;, &lt;cite&gt;Philosophy of Science&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;70&lt;/strong&gt; (2003):
330--358
	&lt;li&gt;Chris Hillman, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.math.washington.edu/~hillman/entropy.html&quot;&gt;Entropy on the
World Wide Web&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Mark Kac, &lt;cite&gt;Probability in Physical Sciences and Related
Topics&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Joel L. Lebowitz, &quot;Statistical mechanics: A selective Review of Two
Central Issues&quot;, &lt;cite&gt;Reviews of Modern Physics&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;71&lt;/strong&gt;
(1999):
S346--S357, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/0010018&quot;&gt;math-ph/0010018&lt;/a&gt;
[Abstract: &quot;I give a highly selective overview of the way statistical mechanics
explains the microscopic origins of the time-asymmetric evolution of
macroscopic systems towards equilibrium and of first-order phase transitions in
equilibrium. These phenomena are emergent collective properties not discernible
in the behavior of individual atoms. They are given precise and elegant
mathematical formulations when the ratio between macroscopic and microscopic
scales becomes very large.&quot;]
	&lt;li&gt;L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, &lt;cite&gt;Statistical Physics&lt;/cite&gt;
[What I was raised on.  To be completely honest, it's been about a decade since
I read it, and more since it was my constant companion, and I am a little
afraid to re-read it, the same way one is sometimes afraid to re-read favorite
novels from long ago, lest they have become worse in the meanwhile...]
	&lt;li&gt;David Selmeczi, Simon F. Tolic-Norrelykke, Erik Schaeffer, Peter H.
Hagedorn, Stephan Mosler, Kirstine Berg-Sorensen, Niels B. Larsen and Henrik
Flyvbjerg, &quot;Brownian Motion after Einstein: Some new applications and new
experiments&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0603142&quot;&gt;physics/0603142&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;James Sethna
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;Order Parameters, Broken Symmetry, and Topology&quot;,
pp. 243--265 in Lynn Nadel and Daniel L. Stein (eds.), &lt;cite&gt;1991 Lectures in
Complex Systems&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Statistical Mechanics: Entropy, Order
Parameters and Complexity&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;../weblog/algae-2009-10.html#sethna&quot;&gt;Mini-review&lt;/a&gt;; &lt;a href=&quot;http://pages.physics.cornell.edu/sethna/StatMech/&quot;&gt;free PDF&lt;/a&gt;]
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Geoffrey Sewell, &lt;cite&gt;Quantum Mechanics and Its Emergent
Macrophysics&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Hugo Touchette, &quot;The Large Deviations Approach to Statistical
Mechanics&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/0804.0327&quot;&gt;arxiv:0804.0327&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Julia Yeomans, &lt;cite&gt;The Statistical Mechanics of Phase
Transitions&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Richard Zallen, &lt;cite&gt;The Physics of Amorphous Solids&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;Modesty forbids:
	&lt;li&gt;CRS and Cristopher Moore, &quot;What Is a Macrotate?&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0303625&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0303625&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;To read, historical:
	&lt;li&gt;Stephen Brush
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Statistical Physics and the Atomic Theory of
Matter&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;The Kind of Motion We Call Heat&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;M. E. Cates, &quot;Soft Condensed Matter&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0411650&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0411650&lt;/a&gt; [&quot;I described
the evolution of soft matter physics as a discipline during the 20th century&quot;]
	&lt;li&gt;Cyril Domb, &lt;cite&gt;The Critical Point: A Historical Introduction to
the Modern Theory of Critical Phenomena&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Albert Einstein, &lt;cite&gt;Investigations on the Theory of Brownian
Motion&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Martin Niss, &quot;History of the Lenz-Ising Model, 1920--1950: From
Ferromagnetic to Cooperative Phenomena&quot;, &lt;Cite&gt;Archive for History of Exact
Sciences&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;59&lt;/strong&gt; (2005): 267--318 [&lt;a
href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00407-004-0088-3&quot;&gt;Journal link&lt;/a&gt;.  From the
abstract: &quot;I chart the considerable changes in the status and conception of the
Lenz-Ising model from 1920 to 1950 in terms of three phases: In the early
1920s, Lenz and Ising introduced the model in the field of
ferromagnetism. Based on an exact derivation, Ising concluded that it is
incapable of displaying ferromagnetic behavior, a result he erroneously
extended to three dimensions. In the next phase, Lenz and Ising's
contemporaries rejected the model as a representation of ferromagnetic
materials because of its conflict with the new quantum mechanics. In the third
phase, from the early 1930s to the early 1940s, the model was revived as a
model of cooperative phenomena. ... [I] focus on the development of the model
in its capacity as a &lt;em&gt;model&lt;/em&gt;. ... A major theme of my study is that even
though the Lenz-Ising model is not fully realistic, it is more useful than more
realistic models because of its mathematical tractability. I argue that this
point of view, important for the modern conception of the model, is novel and
that its emergence, while perhaps not a consequence of its study, is coincident
with the third phase of its development.&quot;  Those of us who work with grossly
unrealistic but tractable models of &lt;a href=&quot;complexity.html&quot;&gt;complex
systems&lt;/a&gt; should pay heed...]
	&lt;li&gt;Johanna Levelt Sengers, &lt;cite&gt;How Fluids Unmix: Discoveries by the
School of Van der Waals and Kamerlingh Onnes&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.press.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/hfs.cgi/00/16186.ctl&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;D. ter Haar, &lt;cite&gt;The Scientific Contributions of
H. A. Kramers&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a
href=&quot;http://pup.princeton.edu/titles/6326.html&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;To read, teaching:
	&lt;li&gt;Greg Anderson, &lt;cite&gt;Thermodynamics of Natural Systems&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/9780521847728&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Roger Balian
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;From Microphysics to Macrophysics: Methods and
Applications of Statistical Physics&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;RB and Jean-Paul Blaizot, &quot;Stars and Statistical Physics:
A Teaching Experience,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/9909291&quot;&gt;cond-mat/9909291&lt;/a&gt; [I plan to
steal from this wholesale if I teach stat. mech.]
	&lt;li&gt;Giovanni Gallavotti, &quot;Equilibrium Statistical Mechanics&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0504790&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0504790&lt;/a&gt; [56
pp. introductory review]
	&lt;li&gt;Martin and Inge F. Goldstein, &lt;cite&gt;The Refrigerator and the
Universe&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Donald T. Haynie, &lt;cite&gt;Biological Thermodynamics&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/9780521795494&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Josef Honerkamp, &lt;cite&gt;Statistical Physics: An Advanced Approach
with Applications&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Charles Kittel, &lt;cite&gt;Elementary Statistical Physics&lt;/cite&gt; [1958
textbook now republished in Dover paperback; looks good and cheap; I learned
a lot from Kittel and Kromer's textbook as an undergraduate]
	&lt;li&gt;Don S. Lemons, &lt;cite&gt;Mere Thermodynamics&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;R. A. Minlos, &lt;cite&gt;Introduction to Mathematical Statistical
Physics&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.ams.org/bookstore?fn=50&amp;item=ULECT-19&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Anastasios A. Tsonis, &lt;cite&gt;Introduction to Atmospheric
Thermodynamics&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/9780521696289&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;/ul&gt;


&lt;ul&gt;To read, learning:
	&lt;li&gt;Ambjorn, Durhuss and Jonsson, &lt;cite&gt;Quantum Geometry&lt;/cite&gt;
[field-theory methods for Brownian motion and higher-dimensional random
surfaces]
	&lt;li&gt;Roger Balian
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;Incomplete Descriptions and Relevant Entropies,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/9907015&quot;&gt;cond-mat/9907015&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;Information in statistical physics&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0501322&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0501322&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Francois Bardou et al., &lt;cite&gt;Levy Statistics and Laser Cooling:
How Rare Events Bring Atoms to Rest&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Jean-Louis Barrat and Jean-Pierre Hansen, &lt;cite&gt;Basic Concepts for Simple and Complex Liquids&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Rodney J. Baxter, &lt;cite&gt;Exactly Solved Models in Statistical
Mechanics&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://store.doverpublications.com/0486462714.html&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Golan Bel and Eli Barkai, &quot;A Random Walk to a Non-Ergodic
Equilibrium Concept&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0506338&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0506338&lt;/a&gt; [I've only
read the abstract, but it puzzles me.  I'd be very interested if we could have
a good notion of equilibrium which didn't depend on ergodicity, but in the
model they're consdering, they can evidently say things like &quot;in the
non-ergodic phase the distribution of the occupation time of the particle on a
given lattice point, approaches U or W shaped distributions related to the
arcsin law&quot;, and I'm not sure how such limits are meaningful without some kind
of &lt;a href=&quot;ergodic-theory.html&quot;&gt;ergodic property&lt;/a&gt;.  But I should just read
the paper.]
	&lt;li&gt;Federico Bonetto and Joel Lebowitz, &quot;Thermodynamic entropy
production fluctuation in a two dimensional shear flow model,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/nlin.CD/0103044&quot;&gt;nlin.CD/0103044&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Anton Bovier, &lt;cite&gt;Statistical Mechanics of Disordered
Systems&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/0521849918&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10955-008-9581-4&quot;&gt;enthusiastic review&lt;/a&gt;
in &lt;cite&gt;J. Stat. Phys.&lt;/cite&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Anton Bovier, Michael Eckhoff, Veronique Gayrard and Markus Klein,
&quot;Metastability and Small Eigenvalues in Markov Chains,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0007343&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0007343&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Todd A. Brun and James B. Hartle, &quot;Entropy of Classical
Histories,&quot; &lt;cite&gt;Physical Review E&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;59&lt;/strong&gt; (1999):
6370--6380
	&lt;li&gt;Lapo Casetti, Marco Pettini, E. G. D. Cohen, &quot;Geometric Approach
to Hamiltonian Dynamics and Statistical Mechanics,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/9912092&quot;&gt;cond-mat/9912092&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Tommaso Castellani and Andrea Cavagna, &quot;Spin-Glass Theory for
Pedestrians&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0505032&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0505032&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Amir Dembo and Andrea Montanari, &quot;Gibbs Measures and Phase Transitions on Sparse Random Graphs&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/0910.5460&quot;&gt;arxiv:0910.5460&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Emilio De Santis and Carlo Marinelli, &quot;Stochastic games with
infinitely many interacting agents&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.PR/0505608&quot;&gt;math.PR/0505608&lt;/a&gt; [Sounds very
cool: &quot;We introduce and study a class of infinite-horizon non-zero-sum
non-cooperative stochastic games with infinitely many interacting agents using
ideas of statistical mechanics. First we show, in the general case of
asymmetric interactions, the existence of a strategy that allows any player to
eliminate losses after a finite random time. In the special case of symmetric
interactions, we also prove that, as time goes to infinity, the game converges
to a Nash equilibrium. Moreover, assuming that all agents adopt the same
strategy, using arguments related to those leading to perfect simulation
algorithms, spatial mixing and ergodicity are proved. In turn, ergodicity
allows us to prove ``fixation'', i.e. that players will adopt a constant
strategy after a finite time. The resulting dynamics is related to
zero-temperature Glauber dynamics on random graphs of possibly infinite
volume.&quot;]
	&lt;li&gt;Deepak Dhar, &quot;Pico-canonical ensembles: A theoretical description
of metastable states,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0205011&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0205011&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Enrico Di Cera, &lt;cite&gt;Thermodynamic Theory of Site-Specific Binding
Processes in Biological Macromolecules&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;E. Dinaburg, C. Maes, S. Pirogov, F. Redig and A. Rybko, &quot;The Potts
model built on sand&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mt/0312363&quot;&gt;cond-mt/0312363&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Viktor Dotsenko, &lt;cite&gt;Introduction to the Replica Theory of Disordered Statistical Systems&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Sam F. Edwards and Moshe Schwartz
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;Lagrangian Statistical Mechanics applied to Non-linear
Stochastic Field Equations,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0012044&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0012044&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;Statistical Mechanics in Collective Coordinates,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0204178&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0204178&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Denis J. Evans, E. G. D. Cohen, Debra J. Searles and Federico
Bonetto, &quot;Note on the Kaplan-Yorke Dimension and Linear Transport
Coefficients,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/9911455&quot;&gt;cond-mat/9911455&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;David Ford and Steven Huntsman, &quot;Descriptive Thermodynamics&quot;,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0510030&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0510030&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;A. Gabrielli, B. Jancovici, M. Joyce, J. L. Lebowitz, L. Pietronero
and F. Sylos Labini, &quot;Generation of Primordial Cosmological Perturbations from
Statistical Mechanical Models,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0210033&quot;&gt;astro-ph/0210033&lt;/a&gt; [I need a
cosmology notebook]
	&lt;li&gt;A. Gabrielli, F. Sylos Labini, M. Joyce and
L. Pietronero, &lt;cite&gt;Statistical Physics for Cosmic Structures&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s10955-006-9092-0&quot;&gt;Extremely positive
review in J. Stat. Phys.&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Cristian Giardina', Jorge Kurchan, Luca Peliti, &quot;Direct evaluation
of large-deviation functions&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0511248&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0511248&lt;/a&gt; [&quot;We
introduce a numerical procedure to evaluate directly the probabilities of large
deviations of physical quantities, such as current or density, that are local
in time. The large-deviation functions are given in terms of the typical
properties of a modified dynamics, and since they no longer involve rare
events, can be evaluated efficiently and over a wider ranges of values.&quot;]
	&lt;li&gt;G. Gregoire and H. Chate, &quot;Onset of collective and cohesive
motion&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0401208&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0401208&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;J. Woods Halley, &lt;cite&gt;Statistical Mechanics: From First Principles
to Macroscopic Phenomena&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/052182575X&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;.  Sounds nice.]
	&lt;li&gt;Andreas Hanke and Ralf Metzler, &quot;Towards the molecular workshop:
entropy-driven designer molecules, entropy activation, and nanomechanical
devices,&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0203539&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0203539&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Horsthemke, &lt;cite&gt;Noise-Induced Transitions: Theory and
Applications in Physics, Chemistry, and Biology &lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Stephen Hyde, Sten Andersson, Kare Larsson, Zoltan Blum, Tomas
Landh, Sven Lidin and Barry Ninham, &lt;cite&gt;The Language of Shape: The Role of
Curvature in Condensed Matter --- Physics, Chemistry, and Biology&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Claude Itzykson and Jean-Michel Drouffe, &lt;cite&gt;Statistical Field
Theory&lt;/cite&gt; (2 vols.)
	&lt;li&gt;Henrik Jeldtoft Jensen, Elsa Arcaute, &quot;Complexity, Collective
Effects and Modelling of Ecosystems: formation, function and
stability&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/0709.2015&quot;&gt;arxiv:0709.2015&lt;/a&gt; [&quot; We
describe examples where combining statistical mechanics and ecology has led to
improved ecological modelling and, at the same time, broadened the scope of
statistical mechanics.&quot;]
	&lt;li&gt;Richard A. L. Jones, &lt;cite&gt;Soft Condensed Matter&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Wouter Kager and Bernard Nienhuis, &quot;A Guide to Stochastic Loewner
Evolution and Its Applications&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/0312056&quot;&gt;math-ph/0312056&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;T. R. Kirkpatrick, D. Belitz, and J. V. Sengers, &quot;Long-Time Tails,
Weak Localization, and Classical and Quantum Critical Behavior,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0110603&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0110603&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Daniel Korenblum and David Shalloway, &quot;Macrostate Data Clustering&quot;,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.67.056704&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Physical Review E&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;67&lt;/strong&gt; (2003): 056704&lt;/a&gt;
[This sounds a lot like spectral clustering and diffusion maps]
	&lt;li&gt;Tsampikos Kottos and Doron Cohen, &quot;Quantum Irreversibility of
Energy Spreading,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0201148&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0201148&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Werner Krauth, &lt;cite&gt;Statistical Mechanics: Algorithms and
Computations&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Karsten Kruse, Jean-Francois Joanny, Frank Julicher, Jacques Prost
and Ken Sekimoto, &quot;Generic theory of active polar gels: A paradigm for
cytoskeletal dynamics&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0406058&quot;&gt;physics/0406058&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Stephan Lawi, &quot;A characterization of Markov processes enjoying the
time-inversion property&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.PR/0506013&quot;&gt;math.PR/0506013&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;L. Leuzzi and T. M. Nieuwenhuizen, &lt;cite&gt;Thermodynamics of the
Glassy State&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.springerlink.com/content/h76138262uq13655/&quot;&gt;Favorable
review&lt;/a&gt; in &lt;cite&gt;J. Stat. Phys.&lt;/cite&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Elliott H. Lieb, &quot;Quantum Mechanics, the Stability of Matter and
Quantum Electrodynamics&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/0401004&quot;&gt;math-ph/0401004&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;D. Lynden-Bell and R. M. Lynden-Bell, &quot;Relaxation to a Perpetually
Pulsating Equilibrium&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0401093&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0401093&lt;/a&gt;
= &lt;cite&gt;Journal of Statistical Physics&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;117&lt;/strong&gt; (2004):
199--209 [A profoundly weird-looking result]
	&lt;li&gt;Carl McBride, &quot;Computers and Liquid State Statistical Mechanics&quot;,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0610771&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0610771&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;David R. Nelson, &lt;cite&gt;Defects and Geometry in Condensed Matter
Physics&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/9780521004008&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;J. Ortiz de Sarate and J. V. Sengers, &lt;cite&gt;Hydrodynamic
Fluctuations&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10955-008-9485-3&quot;&gt;Favorable review&lt;/a&gt; in J. Stat. Phys.]
	&lt;li&gt;Alessandro Pelizzola, &quot;Cluster variation method in statistical
physics and probabilistic graphical models&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/38/33/R01&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Journal of Physics
A: Mathematical and General&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;38&lt;/strong&gt; (2005): R309--R339&lt;/a&gt;
= &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0508216&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0508216&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Sebastian Risau-Gusman, Alexandre S. Martinez and Osame Kinouchi,
&quot;Escaping from cycles through a glass transition,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0301147&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0301147&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Hans Henrik Rugh, &quot;A Micro-Thermodynamic Formalism,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/nlin.CD/0201062&quot;&gt;nlin.CD/0201062&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Michel Talagrand, &lt;cite&gt;Mean Field Models for Spin Glasses:
A First Course&lt;/cite&gt; [110 pp. MS.; thanks to Alessandro Rinaldo for sharing
his copy with me]
	&lt;li&gt;Y. Vallis, T. Qu, M. Micoulaut, F. Chaimbault and P. Boolchand,
&quot;Direct evidence of rigidity loss and self-organisation in silicate
glasses&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0406509&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0406509&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;David Wales, &lt;cite&gt;Energy Landscapes: Applications to Clusters,
Biomolecules and Glasses&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/0521814154&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Paolo Zanardi, Paolo Giorda, and Marco Cozzini,
&quot;Information-Theoretic Differential Geometry of Quantum Phase
Transitions&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http//dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.100603&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Physical Review
Letters&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;99&lt;/strong&gt; (2007): 100603&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>