<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- name="generator" content="blosxom/2.0" -->
<!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN" "http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd">

<rss version="0.91">
  <channel>
    <title>Notebooks   </title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks</link>
    <description>Cosma's Notebooks</description>
    <language>en</language>

  <item>
    <title>Stochastic Differential Equations</title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks/2009/11/07#stoch-diff-eqs</link>
    <description>
&lt;P&gt;Non-stochastic differential equations are models
of &lt;a href=&quot;chaos.html&quot;&gt;dynamical systems&lt;/a&gt; where the state evolves
continuously in time.  If they are autonomous, then the state's future values
depend only on the present state; if they are non-autonomous, it is allowed to
depend on an exogeneous &quot;driving&quot; term as well.  (This may not be the standard
way of putting it, but I think it's both correct and more illuminating than the
more analytical viewpoints, and anyway is the line taken by V. I. Arnol'd in
his book on differential equations.)  Stochastic differential equations (SDEs)
are, conceptually, ones where the the exogeneous driving term is
a &lt;a href=&quot;stochastic-processes.html&quot;&gt;stochatic process&lt;/a&gt;.  --- While
&quot;differential equation&quot;, unmodified, covers both ordinary differential
equations, containing only time derivatives, and partial differential
equations, containing both time and space derivatives, &quot;stochastic differential
equation&quot;, unmodified, refers only to the ordinary case.  Stochastic partial
differential equations are just what you'd think.

&lt;P&gt;The solution of an SDE is, itself, a stochastic process.  Heuristically, the
easiest way to think of how this works is via Euler's method for solving
differential equations, which is itself about the simplest possible numerical
approximation scheme for an ODE.  (This line of thought was apparently
introduced by Bernstein in the 1920s.)  To solve dx/dt = f(x), with initial
condition x(0) = y, Euler's method instructs us to pick a small increment of
time h, and then say that x(t+h) = x(t) + hf(x), using straight-line
interpolation between the points 0, h, 2h, 3h,...  Under suitable conditions on
vector field f, as h shrinks, the function we obtain in this way actually
converges on the correct solution.  To accomodate a stochastic term on the
right-hand side, say dx/dt = f(x) + E(t), where E(t) is random noise, we
approximate x(t+h) - x(t) by hf(x) + E(t+h) - E(t).  Then, once again, we let
the time-increment shrink to zero.  Doing this with full generality requires a
theory of the integrals of stochastic processes, which is made especially
difficult by the fact that many of the stochastic forces one would most
naturally want to use, such as white noise, are ones which don't fit very
naturally into differential equations!  The necessary theory of stochastic
integrals was developed in the 1940s by M. Loeve, K. Ito, and R. Stratonovich
(all building on earlier work by, among
others, &lt;a href=&quot;wiener.html&quot;&gt;N. Wiener&lt;/a&gt;); the theory of SDEs more strictly
by Ito and Stratonovich, in slightly different forms. 

&lt;P&gt;Most of what one encounters, in applications, as the theory of SDEs assumes
that the driving noise is in fact white, i.e., Gaussian and uncorrelated over
time.  On the one hand, this is less of a restriction than it might seem,
because many other natural sorts of noise process can be represented as
stochastic integrals of white noise.  On the other hand, the same mathematical
structure can be used directly to define stochastic integrals and stochastic
DEs driven by a far broader class of stochastic processes; on this topic
Kallenberg is a very good introduction.

&lt;ul&gt;Recommended, more introductory:
	&lt;li&gt;Geoffrey Grimmett and David Stirzaker, &lt;cite&gt;Probability and Random
Processes&lt;/cite&gt; [The last chapter of the 3rd edition has a good, if rather
heuristic, first-glimpse look at SDEs.  I can't recall if it appeared in
earlier editions or not.]
	&lt;li&gt;Josef Honerkamp, &lt;cite&gt;Stochastic Dynamical Systems&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Joel Keizer, &lt;cite&gt;Statistical Thermodynamics of Nonequilibrium
Processes&lt;/cite&gt; [Describes SDEs, in the Ito framework, from a heuristic
viewpoint, motivated by, precisely, the need to model non-equilibrium
thermodynamic processes; goes on to use them in many interesting physical
applications.]
	&lt;li&gt;Andrzej Lasota and Michael C.  Mackey, &lt;cite&gt;Chaos, Fractals and
Noise: Stochastic Aspects of Dynamics&lt;/cite&gt; [The later chapters give
a solid introduction to SDEs, starting from the Euler-Bernstein approach, but to
my mind somewhat slighting the quite real advantages of the Ito calculus
for more advanced problems]
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eng.tau.ac.il/~liptser/&quot;&gt;Robert
S. Liptser&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;cite&gt;&lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.eng.tau.ac.il/~liptser/list.html&quot;&gt;Lectures on Stochastic
Processes&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/cite&gt; [See especially &lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.eng.tau.ac.il/~liptser/lectures/lect_new10.pdf&quot;&gt;lecture
10&lt;/a&gt;, on white noise,
and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eng.tau.ac.il/~liptser/lectures/lect_new12.pdf&quot;&gt;lecture
12&lt;/a&gt;, on Ito integrals.]
	&lt;li&gt;Bernt Oksendal, &lt;cite&gt;Stochastic Differential Equations&lt;/cite&gt;
[First-rate introductory textbook, loaded with examples and
intuition-building.]
	&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;Recommended, more advanced:
	&lt;li&gt;I. I. Gikhman and A. V. Skorokhod, &lt;cite&gt;Introduction to the Theory
of Random Processes&lt;/cite&gt; [Excellent long chapter on stochastic integrals and
SDEs; these authors went on to publish several more books on SDEs, but I
confess I have not read them.]
	&lt;li&gt;Olav Kallenberg, &lt;cite&gt;Foundations of Modern Probability&lt;/cite&gt;
[Builds up the theory of stochastic integrals and stochastic differential
equations from scratch, ending with a very general framework which makes it
clear just which parts of the original approach, tied to the Wiener process,
were necessary and which were accidental.  However, Kallenberg's book is
intended as a comprehensive textbook on &lt;a href=&quot;probability.html&quot;&gt;probability theory&lt;/a&gt;, from measure theory
through &lt;a href=&quot;large-deviations.html&quot;&gt;large deviations&lt;/a&gt;.  This means that
it is both mathematically demanding, and that he takes a &quot;spiral&quot; approach,
revisitng this topic, like many others, repeatedly through the text.  There
are, however, abundant cross-references.]
	&lt;li&gt;Robert S. Liptser and Albert N. Shiryaev, &lt;cite&gt;Statistics of
Random Processes&lt;/cite&gt; [Vol. I gives a very detailed account of the classical,
Wiener-process theory and its uses in &lt;a href=&quot;filtering.html&quot;&gt;optimal
filtering&lt;/a&gt;; vol. II considers numerous applications in statistics and
signal-processing, as well as some generalizations and extensions.]
	&lt;li&gt;Michel Loeve, &lt;cite&gt;Probability Theory&lt;/cite&gt; [Gives
a very elegant account of Loeve's contributions to the theory of
stochastic integrals]
	&lt;li&gt;L. C. G. Rogers and D. Williams, &lt;cite&gt;Diffusions, Markov
Processes, and Martingales&lt;/cite&gt; [See especially Vol. II, &lt;cite&gt;Ito
Calculus&lt;/cite&gt;.]
	&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;Modesty forbids me to recommend:
	&lt;li&gt;CRS with
A. Kontorovich, &lt;cite&gt;&lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~cshalizi/almost-none&quot;&gt;Almost None of the Theory
of Stochastic Processes&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/cite&gt; [A fairly large chunk of this manuscript is
devoted to stochastic integrals and SDEs.]
	&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;To read:
	&lt;li&gt;Lakhdar Aggoun and Robert Elliott, &lt;cite&gt;Measure Theory and
Filtering: Introduction with Applications&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;David Applebaum, &lt;cite&gt;L&amp;eacute;vy Processes and Stochastic
Calculus&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Yuri Bakhtin and Jonathan C. Mattingly, &quot;Stationary Solutions of
Stochastic Differential Equation with Memory and Stochastic Partial
Differential Equations&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.PR/0509166&quot;&gt;math.PR/0509166&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Viorel Barbu, Philippe Blanchard, Giuseppe Da Prato, Michael
R&amp;ouml;ckner, &quot;Self-organized criticality via stochastic partial differential
equations&quot;,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/0811.2093&quot;&gt;arxiv:0811.2093&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Nicolas Bouleau and Dominique L&amp;eacute;pngle, &lt;cite&gt;Numerical
Methods for Stochastic Process&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;A. A. Budini and M.O. Caceres, &quot;Functional characterization of
generalized Langevin equations&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0402311&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0402311&lt;/a&gt; [Abstract:
&quot;We present an exact functional formalism to deal with linear Langevin
equations with arbitrary memory kernels and driven by any noise structure
characterized through its characteristic functional. No others hypothesis are
assumed over the noise, neither the fluctuation dissipation theorem. We found
that the characteristic functional of the linear process can be expressed in
terms of noise's functional and the Green function of the deterministic
(memory-like) dissipative dynamics. This object allow us to get a procedure to
calculate all the Kolmogorov hierarchy of the non-Markov process. As examples
we have characterized through the 1-time probability a noise-induced interplay
between the dissipative dynamics and the structure of different noises.
Conditions that lead to non-Gaussian statistics and distributions with long
tails are analyzed. The introduction of arbitrary fluctuations in fractional
Langevin equations have also been pointed out.&quot;]
	&lt;li&gt;Emmanuelle Cl&amp;eacute;ment, Arturo Kohatsu-Higa, Damien Lamberton,
&quot;A duality approach for the weak approximation of stochastic differential
equations&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.PR/0610178&quot;&gt;math.PR/0610178&lt;/a&gt;
= &lt;cite&gt;Annals of Applied Probability&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;16&lt;/strong&gt; (2006):
1124--1154 [&quot;a new methodology to prove weak approximation results for general
stochastic differential equations. Instead of using a partial differential
equation approach as is usually done for diffusions, the approach considered
here uses the properties of the linear equation satisfied by the error
process&quot;]
	&lt;li&gt;Jacky Cresson and S&amp;eacute;bastien Darses, &quot;Stochastic embedding of
dynamical
systems&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.PR/0509713&quot;&gt;math.PR/0509713&lt;/a&gt;
[112pp.  &quot;Most physical systems are modelled by an ordinary or a partial
differential equation, like the n-body problem in celestial mechanics. In some
cases, for example when studying the long term behaviour of the solar system or
for complex systems, there exist elements which can influence the dynamics of
the system which are not well modelled or even known. One way to take these
problems into account consists of looking at the dynamics of the system on a
larger class of objects, that are eventually stochastic. In this paper, we
develop a theory for the stochastic embedding of ordinary differential
equations. We apply this method to Lagrangian systems. In this particular case,
we extend many results of classical mechanics namely, the least action
principle, the Euler-Lagrange equations, and Noether's theorem. We also obtain
a Hamiltonian formulation for our stochastic Lagrangian systems. Many
applications are discussed at the end of the paper.&quot;]
	&lt;li&gt;A. M. Davie, &quot;Uniqueness of solutions of stochastic differential equations&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/0709.4147&quot;&gt;arxiv:0709.4147&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Hartin Hairer, &quot;Exponential Mixing Properties of Stochastic PDEs
Through Asymptotic Coupling,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arXiv.org/abs/math/0109115&quot;&gt;math.PR/0109115&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;David Hochberg, Carmen Molina-Paris, Juan P&amp;eacute;rez-Mercader and
Matt Visser, &quot;Effective Action for Stochastic Partial Differential
Equations,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/9904215&quot;&gt;cond-mat/9904215&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Helge Holden, &lt;cite&gt;Stochastic Partial Differential
Equations: A Modeling, White Noise Functional Approach&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Yoshifusa Ito and Izumi Kubo, &quot;Calculus on Gaussian and Poisson
White Noises&quot;, &lt;cite&gt;Nagoya Mathematical Journal&lt;/cite&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;111&lt;/strong&gt; (1988): 41--84
[&lt;a
href=&quot;http://projecteuclid.org/DPubS/Repository/1.0/Disseminate?view=body&amp;id=p
df_1&amp;handle=euclid.nmj/1118781051&quot;&gt;Full text PDF&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Gopinath Kallianpur and Jie Xiong, &lt;cite&gt;Stochastic
Differential Equations in Infinite Dimensional Spaces&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Karatzas and Shreve, &lt;cite&gt;Brownian Motion and Stochastic
Calculus&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Peter Kotelenez, &lt;cite&gt;Stochastic Ordinary and Stochastic Partial Differential Equations: Transition from Microscopic to Macroscopic Equations&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.springer.com/math/probability/book/978-0-387-74316-5&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Venkatarama Krishnan, &lt;cite&gt;Nonlinear Filtering and Smoothing:
An Introduction to Martingales, Stochastic Integrals and Estimation&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;H. Kunita, &lt;cite&gt;Stochastic Flows and Stochastic Differential
Equations&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/0521599253&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;S. V. Lototsky and B. L. Rozovskii
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;Wiener Chaos Solutions of Linear Stochastic Evolution
Equations&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.PR/0504558&quot;&gt;math.PR/0504558&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;Stochastic Differential Equations: A Wiener Chaos
Approach&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.PR/0504559&quot;&gt;math.PR/0504559&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Jonathan C. Mattingly, Andrew M. Stuart, M.V. Tretyakov, &quot;Convergence of Numerical Time-Averaging and Stationary Measures via Poisson Equations&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/0908.4450&quot;&gt;arxiv:0908.4450&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Anatolii V. Mokshin, Renat M. Yulmetyev, and Peter H&amp;auml;nggi,
&quot;Simple Measure of Memory for Dynamical Processes Described by a Generalized
Langevin Equation&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.200601&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Physical Review
Letters&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;95&lt;/strong&gt; (2005): 200601&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Esteban Moro and Henri Schurz, &quot;Non-negativity preserving numerical
algorithms for stochastic differential
equations&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.NA/0509724&quot;&gt;math.NA/0509724&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Cyril Odasso, &quot;Exponential mixing for stochastic PDEs: the
non-additive
case&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00440-007-0057-2&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Probability
Theory and Related Fields&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;140&lt;/strong&gt; (2008): 41--82&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Fabien Panloup, &quot;Recursive computation of the invariant measure of
a stochastic differential equation driven by a L\'{e}vy
process&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.PR/0509712&quot;&gt;math.PR/0509712&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;S. Peszat and J. Zabczyk, &lt;cite&gt;Stochastic Partial Differential
Equations with L&amp;eacute;vy Noise: An evolution Equation approach&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/9780521879897&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Philip Protter, &lt;cite&gt;Stochastic Integration and Differential
Equations&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;LI&gt;A. J. Roberts, &quot;Normal form transforms separate slow and fast modes in stochastic dynamical systems&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.DS/0701623&quot;&gt;math.DS/0701623&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Ramon van Handel, &quot;Almost Global Stochastic Stability&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.PR/0411311&quot;&gt;math.PR/0411311&lt;/a&gt; [&quot;We develop a
method to prove almost global stability of stochastic differential equations in
the sense that almost every intial point ... is asymptotically attracted to the
origin with unit probability.&quot;]
	&lt;li&gt;Wei Wang and Jinqiao Duan, &quot;Invariant manifold reduction and
bifurcation for stochastic partial differential
equations&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.DS/0607050&quot;&gt;math.DS/0607050&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>