<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- name="generator" content="blosxom/2.0" -->
<!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN" "http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd">

<rss version="0.91">
  <channel>
    <title>Notebooks   </title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks</link>
    <description>Cosma's Notebooks</description>
    <language>en</language>

  <item>
    <title>Stochastic Processes</title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks/2009/08/25#stochastic-processes</link>
    <description>

&lt;P&gt;Things to understand better: &lt;a href=&quot;large-deviations.html&quot;&gt;Large
deviations&lt;/a&gt;.  Non-asymptotic convergence rates.  Convergence properties of
non-stationary processes.  Coupling
methods.  &lt;a href=&quot;time-series.html&quot;&gt;Statistical inference&lt;/a&gt; on processes.
&lt;a href=&quot;convergence-of-stochastic-processes.html&quot;&gt;Convergence in distribution
of sequences of
processes&lt;/a&gt;.  &lt;a href=&quot;empirical-process-theory.html&quot;&gt;Empirical process
theory&lt;/a&gt; (i.e. processes where the index set is a sigma field or a function
space), especially when the data are themselves generated by a non-IID process.

&lt;P&gt;A common thing to ask about a stochastic process (assuming it takes values
in a vector space) is its time-average.  For IID sequences, with finite
variance at each time, the ordinary central limit theorem tells us the
distribution of the average converges to a Gaussian.  With infinite variance,
the limiting distribution is one of the Levy distributions.  For independent,
non-identically distributed sequences, similar but weaker results hold.
Quueries: Do we know a necessary and sufficient condition for central limit
theorems (Gaussian or Levy) for &lt;em&gt;dependent&lt;/em&gt; sequences?  (I can find lots
of sufficient ones, and trivial necessary ones.)  Under some circumstances, one
can show that a dependent sequence will converge to an exponential
distribution.  (The most common example is a random walk with a reflecting
barrier.)  Do we know necessary and sufficient conditions for convergence to
exponentials?  (This question is related to the origin
of &lt;a href=&quot;power-laws.html&quot;&gt;power-law distributions&lt;/a&gt;.)  Is there a
characterization for distributions which can be the limits of
averaging &lt;em&gt;dependent&lt;/em&gt; random variables?  Can we take an IID,
finite-variance sequence, and introduce dependence in such a way as to (1)
leave the marginal distribution at each time alone but (2) make the limiting
distribution Levy?  (With thanks to Spyros Skouras for bugging me about these
and related matters.)

&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;markov.html&quot;&gt;Markov
processes&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;branching-processes.html&quot;&gt;branching processes&lt;/a&gt;
and &lt;a href=&quot;stoch-diff-eqs.html&quot;&gt;stochastic differential equations&lt;/a&gt; are
important enough to be spun off into separate notebooks.

&lt;P&gt;See also:
	&lt;a href=&quot;large-deviations.html&quot;&gt;Large Deviations&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;neural-coding.html&quot;&gt;Neural Coding&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;noneq-sm.html&quot;&gt;Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;infinite-stochastic-dyn-sys.html&quot;&gt;On the Asymptotics of an
Infinite-Dimensional Stochastic Dynamical System&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;random-time-changes.html&quot;&gt;Random Time Changes for Stochastic Processes&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;a href=&quot;spatial-statistics.html&quot;&gt;Spatial Statistics and Spatial Stochastic Processes&lt;/a&gt;


&lt;ul&gt;Recommended, general [including general probability books which I think are
especially good on random processes]:
	&lt;li&gt;M. S. Bartlett, &lt;cite&gt;An Introduction to Stochastic Processes, with
Special Reference to Methods and Applications&lt;/cite&gt; [Older, far less technical
(e.g., no measure theory), but very sound, lots of interesting applications,
and a considerable chunk of likelihood-based statistical theory integrated in,
which is pleasing.]
	&lt;li&gt;Patrick Billingsley
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Ergodic Theory and Information&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Probability and Measure&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Vivek S. Borkar, &lt;cite&gt;Probability Theory: An Advanced
Course&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;J.-R. Chazottes, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://jeanrene.chazottes.googlepages.com/bookslecturenotessurveys&quot;&gt;Books
and lecture notes&lt;/a&gt; [On probability, stochastic processes, and related
subjects]
	&lt;li&gt;Alexandre J. Chorin and Ole Hald, &lt;cite&gt;Stochastic Tools in
Mathematics and Science&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;J. Doob, &lt;cite&gt;Stochastic Processes&lt;/cite&gt; [Since 1953, the
Bible.]
	&lt;li&gt;William Feller, &lt;cite&gt;An Introduction to the Theory of
Probability and Its Applications&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Bert Fristedt and Lawrence Gray, &lt;cite&gt;A Modern Approach to
Probability Theory&lt;/cite&gt; [Extremely thorough measure-theoretic text; nice
treatment of stochastic processes]
	&lt;li&gt;I. I. Gikhman and A. V. Skorokhod, &lt;cite&gt;Introduction to the Theory
of Random Processes&lt;/cite&gt; [Despite the title, this is an advanced book, making
extensive use of measure theoretic-probability, which is summarized in one
chapter.  But it is a &lt;em&gt;very good&lt;/em&gt; book of this sort.]
	&lt;li&gt;Robert M. Gray, &lt;cite&gt;Probability, Random Processes, and Ergodic
Properties&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a
href=&quot;http://ee-www.stanford.edu/~gray/arp.html&quot;&gt;Online&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Geoffrey Grimmett and David Stirzaker, &lt;cite&gt;Probability and Random
Processes&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Hoel, Port and Stone, &lt;cite&gt;Introduction to Stochastic
Processes&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Olav Kallenberg, &lt;cite&gt;Foundations of Modern Probability&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.eng.tau.ac.il/~liptser/&quot;&gt;R. Lipster&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.eng.tau.ac.il/~liptser/list.html&quot;&gt;Lecture Notes for Stochastic
Processes&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;M. Loeve, &lt;cite&gt;Probability Theory&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Rinaldo Schinazi, &lt;cite&gt;Classical and Spatial Stochastic
Processes&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Frank Spitzer, &lt;cite&gt;Principles of Random Walk&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;Recommended, more specialized (very misc.):
	&lt;li&gt;J.-R. Chazottes, P. Collet, C. Kuelske and F. Redig, &quot;Deviation
inequalities via coupling for stochastic processes and random fields&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.PR/0503483&quot;&gt;math.PR/0503483&lt;/a&gt; [Very cool]
	&lt;li&gt;Harald Cram&amp;eacute;r, &lt;cite&gt;Structural and Statistical Problems for
a Class of Stochastic Processes&lt;/cite&gt; [Very nice results about when stochastic
processes can be represented as integrated responses to a driving noise term,
with statistical applications in the Gaussian case.  Delivered as the first
S. S. Wilks lecture at Princeton in 1970, published as a 30 pp. booklet in 1971
by Princeton University Press.]
	&lt;li&gt;Eric Mjolsness, &quot;Stochastic Process Semantics for Dynamical Grammar
Syntax: An
Overview&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.AI/0511073&quot;&gt;cs.AI/0511073&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Robin Pemantle, &quot;A Survey of Random Processes with Reinforcement&quot;,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.PR/0610076&quot;&gt;math.PR/0610076&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Hernan G. Solari and Mario A. Natiello, &quot;Stochastic population
dynamics: The Poisson approximation&quot;, &lt;cite&gt;Physical Review
E&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;67&lt;/strong&gt; (2003): 031918 [&lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.maths.lth.se/matematiklth/personal/mario/talks/stoch.pdf&quot;&gt;PDF&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Wei Biao Wu, &quot;Nonlinear system theory: Another look at
dependence&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0506715102&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;102&lt;/strong&gt; (2005):
14150--14154&lt;/a&gt; [&quot;we introduce previously undescribed dependence measures for
stationary causal processes. Our physical and predictive dependence measures
quantify the degree of dependence of outputs on inputs in physical systems. The
proposed dependence measures provide a natural framework for a limit theory for
stationary processes. In particular, under conditions with quite simple forms,
we present limit theorems for partial sums, empirical processes, and kernel
density estimates. The conditions are mild and easily verifiable because they
are directly related to the data-generating mechanisms.&quot;]
	&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;Modesty forbids me to recommend:
	&lt;li&gt;My &lt;a href=&quot;../prob-notes/&quot;&gt;lecture notes from the 2000 Complex
Systems Summer School&lt;/a&gt;, for students who had never seen random processes
before, or didn't remember them well
	&lt;li&gt;My &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~cshalizi/754&quot;&gt;lecture notes
from Statistics 754 at Carnegie Mellon&lt;/a&gt;, for students who have had a basic
course in measure-theoretic probability and are interested
in &lt;a href=&quot;ergodic-theory.html&quot;&gt;ergodic
theory&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;large-deviations.html&quot;&gt;large deviations&lt;/a&gt;, etc.
	&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;To read, teaching:
	&lt;li&gt;Rabi Bhattacharya and Mukul Majumdar, &lt;cite&gt;Random Dynamical
Systems: Theory and Applications&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/9780521532723&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Adam Bobrowski, &lt;cite&gt;Functional Analysis for Probability and
Stochastic Processes: An Introduction&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/0521539374&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Vincenzo Capasso and David Bakstein, &lt;cite&gt;An Introduction to
Continuous-Time Stochastic Processes: Theory, Models, and Applications to
Finance, Biology, and Medicine&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.springeronline.com/sgw/cda/frontpage/0,11855,5-0-22-34723835-0,00.html&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Kiyosi Ito, &lt;cite&gt;Essentials of Stochastic Processes&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ams.org/bookstore?fn=20&amp;arg1=probability&amp;item=MMONO-231&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;.  Yes, &lt;a href=&quot;stoch-diff-eqs.html&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;that&lt;/em&gt;
Ito&lt;/a&gt;.]
	&lt;li&gt;Don S. Lemons, &lt;cite&gt;An Introduction to Stochastic Processes
in Physics&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Barry L. Nelson, &lt;cite&gt;Stochastic Modeling: Analysis and Simulation&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;N. G. van Kampen, &lt;cite&gt;Stochastic Processes in Physics and
Chemistry&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Wax (ed.), &lt;cite&gt;Selected Papers on Noise and Stochastic
Processes&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;/ul&gt;


&lt;ul&gt;To read, learning:
	&lt;li&gt;J. M. P. Albin, &quot;On Sampling of stationary increment processes&quot;, &lt;cite&gt;Annals of Applied Probability&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;14&lt;/strong&gt; (2004):
2016--2037 = &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.PR/0403554&quot;&gt;math.PR/0403554&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Vitor Araujo, &quot;Random Dynamical
Systems&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.DS/0608162&quot;&gt;math.DS/0608162&lt;/a&gt; =
pp. 330--385 in J.-P. Francoise, G. L. Naber and Tsou
S. T. (eds.), &lt;cite&gt;Encyclopedia of Mathematical Physics&lt;/cite&gt;, vol. 3
	&lt;li&gt;V. I. Bakhtin, &quot;Positive Processes&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.DS/0505446&quot;&gt;math.DS/0505446&lt;/a&gt; [&quot;we introduce
positive flows and processes, which generalize the ordinary dynamical systems
and stochastic processes&quot;, with promises of laws of large numbers, large
deviation properties and action functionals]
	&lt;li&gt;Andrea Baldassarri, Francesca Colaiori and Claudio Castellano, &quot;The
average shape of a fluctuation: universality in excursions of stochastic
processes,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0301068&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0301068&lt;/a&gt; [A cool
result, if true]
	&lt;li&gt;Michele Baldini, &quot;On the Lyapunov Exponent of a Multidimensional
Stochastic
Flow&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.PR/0610665&quot;&gt;math.PR/0610665&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Fulvio Baldovin, Attilio L. Stella, &quot;Central limit theorem for
anomalous scaling induced by correlations&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0510225&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0510225&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Nils Berglund and Barbara Gentz, &quot;Beyond the Fokker-Planck
equation: Pathwise control of noisy bistable systems,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0110180&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0110180&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Alain Boudou, &quot;Approximation of the principal components analysis
of a stationary function&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spl.2005.09.008&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Statistics and
Probability Letters&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;76&lt;/strong&gt; (2006): 571--578&lt;/a&gt; [&quot;The aim
of this article is the approximation of the principal components analysis (PCA)
of a stationary function, defined on R, by the PCA of a stationary series. For
this, we use a discretization of the real line. We study the behavior of the
approximation when the step of discretization decreases.&quot;]
	&lt;li&gt;Nicolas Bouleau and Dominique L&amp;eacute;pngle, &lt;cite&gt;Numerical
Methods for Stochastic Process&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Anton Bovier, &lt;cite&gt;Statistical Mechanics of Disordered
Systems&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cambridge.org/us/0521849918&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Francis Comets, Roberto Fernandez and Pablo A. Ferrari, &quot;Processes
with Long Memory: Regenerative Construction and Perfect Simulation,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.PR/0009204&quot;&gt;math.PR/0009204&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;M. Cranston and Y. LeJean, &quot;Geometric Evolution Under Isotropic
Stochastic Flow,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.math.washington.edu/~ejpecp/EjpVol3/paper4.abs.html&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Electronic
Journal of Probability&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;3&lt;/strong&gt; (1998): 4&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Predrag Cvitanovic, C. P. Dettmann, Ronnie Mainier and G&amp;aacute;bor
Vattay, &quot;Trace Formulas for Stochastic Evolution Operators: Smooth Conjugation
Method,&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/chao-dyn/9811003&quot;&gt;chao-dyn/9811003&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Silvio R. Dahmen, Haye Hinrichsen, Wolfgang Kinzel,
&quot;Space Representation of Stochastic Processes with Delay&quot;,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0703582&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0703582&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;James Davidson, &lt;cite&gt;Stochastic Limit Theory: An Introduction
for Econometricians&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Victor H. de la Pena, Rustam Ibragimov, and Shaturgun Sharakhmetov,
&quot;Characterizations of joint distributions, copulas, information, dependence and
decoupling, with applications to time
series&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.ST/0611166&quot;&gt;math.ST/0611166&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Victor H. De La Pena and Ming Yang, &quot;Bounding the first passage
time on an average&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spl.2002.09.001&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Statistics and
Probability Letters&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;67&lt;/strong&gt; (2004): 1--7&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;J. Dedecker, F. Merlev&amp;egrave;de, M. Peligrad, &quot;Invariance
principles for linear processes. Application to isotonic
regression&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/0903.1951&quot;&gt;arxiv:0903.1951&lt;/a&gt;
[&quot;maximal inequalities and study the functional central limit theorem for the
partial sums of linear processes generated by dependent innovations. Due to the
general weights these processes can exhibit long range dependence and the
limiting distribution is a fractional Brownian motion&quot;]
	&lt;li&gt;Ronald Dickman, &quot;Numerical analysis of the master equation,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0110558&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0110558&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Ronald Dickman and Ronaldo Vidigal
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;Path Integrals and Perturbation Theory for Stochastic
Processes,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0205321&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0205321&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;Quasi-stationary distributions for stochastic processes
with an absorbing state,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0110557&quot;&gt;cond-mat/0110557&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;S. H. Djah, H. Gottschalk, and H. Ouerdiane, &quot;Feynman graphs for
non-Gaussian measures&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/0501030&quot;&gt;math-ph/0501030&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Peter G. Doyle and J. Laurie Snell, &quot;Random Walks and Electric
Networks,&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.PR/0001057&quot;&gt;math.PR/0001057&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Mohamed El Machkouri and Lahcen Ouchti, &quot;Exact convergence rates
in the central limit theorem for a class of martingales&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.PR/0403385&quot;&gt;math.PR/0403385&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Alison M. Etheridge, &lt;cite&gt;An Introduction to Superprocesses&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.ams.org/bookstore?fn=50&amp;item=ULECT-20&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Sergio Fajardo and H. Jerome Keisler , &lt;cite&gt;Model Theory of
Stochastic Processes&lt;/cite&gt; [Review in &lt;cite&gt;Bulletin of the London
Mathematical Society&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://akpeters.com/pdf/Model_Theory_of_Stochastic_Processes(LNL14)_Bulletin_of_the_LMS.pdf&quot;&gt;reproduced&lt;/a&gt; by the publisher]
	&lt;li&gt;David Gamarnik, &quot;Computing stationary probability distributions and
large deviation rates for constrained random walks. The undecidability
results,&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.PR/0204268&quot;&gt;math.PR/0204268&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Tryphon T. Georgiou, &quot;An intrinsic metric for power spectral
density
functions&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.PR/0608486&quot;&gt;math.PR/0608486&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;H. Gopalkrishna Gadiyar and R. Padma, &quot;Ramanujan-Fourier series,
the Wiener-Khintchine formula and the distribution of prime pairs&quot;,
&lt;cite&gt;Physica A&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;269&lt;/strong&gt; (1999): 503--510 [The
autocorrelation function of the primes!  (Thanks to Dr. Gadiyar for a reprint)]
	&lt;li&gt;Anne Gegout-Petit and Daniel Commenges, &quot;A general definition of
influence between stochastic processes&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/0905.3619&quot;&gt;arxiv:0905.3619&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Beniamin Goldys and Bohdan Maslowski, &quot;Uniform exponential
ergodicity of stochastic dissipative systems,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.PR/0111143&quot;&gt;math.PR/0111143&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Geoffrey Grimmett and Dominic Welsh, &quot;John Michael Hammersley
(1920--2004)&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.PR/0610862&quot;&gt;math.PR/0610862&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Vineet Gupta, Radha Jagadeesan and Prakash Panangaden, &quot;Approximate
reasoning for real-time probabilistic processes&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.LO/0505063&quot;&gt;cs.LO/0505063&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Peter J. Haas, &lt;cite&gt;Stochastic Petri Nets: Modelling, Stability,
Simulation&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Barry D. Hughes, &lt;cite&gt;Random Walks and Random Environments&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Aleksander M. Iksanov, Zbigniew J. Jurek, &quot;Shot noise
distributions and selfdecomposability,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.PR/0111069&quot;&gt;math.PR/0111069&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;L. Ingber, C. Chen, R.P. Mondescu, D. Muzzall and M. Renedo,
&quot;Probability tree algorithm for general diffusion processes,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0103013&quot;&gt;physics/0103013&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;T. Kuna, J. L. Lebowitz and E. R. Speer, &quot;Realizability of point
processes&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/0612075&quot;&gt;math-ph/0612075&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Jeffrey C. Lagarias, Eric Rains and Robert J. Vanderbei, &quot;The
Kruskal Count,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.PR/0110143&quot;&gt;math.PR/0110143&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Liao Ming, &lt;cite&gt;L&amp;eacute;vy Processes in Lie Groups&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/0521836530&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Russell Lyons and Jeffrey E. Steif, &quot;Stationary Determinantal
Processes: Phase Transitions, Bernoullicity, Entropy, and Domination,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.PR/0204324&quot;&gt;math.PR/0204324&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Ashkan Nikeghbali, &quot;A class of remarkable submartingales&quot;,
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;I&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.PR/0505515&quot;&gt;math.PR/0505515&lt;/a&gt; [&quot;In this
paper, we consider the special class of positive local submartingales $(X_{t})$
of the form: {t}=N_{t}+A_{t}$, where the measure $(dA_{t})$ is carried by
the set ${t: X_{t}=0}$. We show that many examples of stochastic processes
studied in the literature are in this class...&quot;]
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;II: Enlargments of filtrations&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.PR/0505623&quot;&gt;math.PR/0505623&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Jan Obloj, &quot;The Skorokhod Problem and Its Offspring&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.PR/0401114&quot;&gt;math.PR/0401114&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Piero Olla and Luca Pignagnoli, &quot;Local evolution equations for
non-Markovian processes&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/nlin.CD/0502022&quot;&gt;nlin.CD/0502022&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Gilles Pag&amp;egrave;s, &quot;Quadratic optimal functional quantization of
stochastic processes and numerical
applications&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/0706.4450&quot;&gt;arxiv:0706.4450&lt;/a&gt;
[&quot;Functional quantization is a way to approximate a process, viewed as a
Hilbert-valued random variable, using a nearest neighbour projection on a
finite codebook.&quot;]
	&lt;li&gt;Magda Peligrad and Sergey Utev
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;A new maximal inequality and
invariance principle for stationary sequences&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.PR/0406606&quot;&gt;math.PR/0406606&lt;/a&gt; = &lt;a
href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10%2E1214/009117904000001035&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Annals of
Probability&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;33&lt;/strong&gt; (2005): 798--815&lt;/a&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&quot;Central limit theorem for stationary linear
processes&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.PR/0509682&quot;&gt;math.PR/0509682&lt;/a&gt;
[&quot;We establish the central limit theorem for linear processes with dependent
innovations including martingales and mixingale type of assumptions as defined
in McLeisch (1977) and motivated by Gordin (1969). In doing so we shall
preserve the generality of the coefficients, including the long range
dependence case, and we shall express the variance of partial sums in a form
easy to apply. Ergodicity is not required.&quot;]
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Marcus Pivato, &quot;Building a Stationary Stochastic Process From a
Finite-dimensional Marginal,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.PR/0108081&quot;&gt;math.PR/0108081&lt;/a&gt; [And you
thought the Danielli-Kolmogorov Theorem was bad!]
	&lt;li&gt;M. Planat, &lt;Cite&gt;Noise, Oscillators and Algebraic Randomness: From
Noise in Communications Systems to Number Theory&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;LI&gt;A. J. Roberts, &quot;Normal form transforms separate slow and fast modes in stochastic dynamical systems&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.DS/0701623&quot;&gt;math.DS/0701623&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;J. B. Roberts and P. D. Spanos, &lt;cite&gt;Random Vibration and
Statistical Linearization&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a
href=&quot;http://store.yahoo.com/doverpublications/0486432408.html&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Andrea Rocco and Bruce J. West, &quot;Fractional Calculus and the
Evolution of Fractal Phenomena,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/chao-dyn/9810030&quot;&gt;chao-dyn/9810030&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Ken-Iti Sato, &lt;citE&gt;L&amp;eacte;vy Processes and Infinitely Divisible
Distributions&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/0521553024&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Naoki Saito, &quot;The Generalized Spike Process, Sparsity, and
Statistical Independence,&quot; &lt;a
href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.PR/0110103&quot;&gt;math.PR/0110103&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;S. Satheesh and E. Sandhya, &quot;Semi-Selfdecomposable Laws and Related
Processes&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.PR/0412546&quot;&gt;math.PR/0412546&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Jacek Serafin, &quot;Finitary Codes, a short survey&quot;,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/math.DS/0608252&quot;&gt;math.DS/0608252&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Wojciech Szpankowski, &lt;cite&gt;Average Case Analysis of Algorithms on
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cs.purdue.edu/homes/spa/book.html&quot;&gt;Preprint version&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Thorisson, &lt;Cite&gt;Coupling, Stationarity and Regeneration&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Jiming Yu and Sergio Verdu, &quot;Schemes for Bidirectional Modeling of
Discrete Stationary
Sources&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2006.883626&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;IEEE
Transactions on Information Theory&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;52&lt;/strong&gt; (2006):
4789--4807&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>