<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- name="generator" content="blosxom/2.0" -->
<!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN" "http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd">

<rss version="0.91">
  <channel>
    <title>Notebooks   </title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks</link>
    <description>Cosma's Notebooks</description>
    <language>en</language>

  <item>
    <title>Symbolic Correlations</title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks/2004/08/23#symbolic-correlations</link>
    <description>
The Chinese had a very elaborate system of these, as did Euro-Islamic &lt;a
href=&quot;astrology.html&quot;&gt;astrology&lt;/a&gt;.  Were there any others?  (Yes, lots: see
Farmer, Henderso and Witzel, below.)  Was there a common root?  How did people
use them?


&lt;ul&gt;Recommended:
	&lt;li&gt;Steve Farmer, John B. Henderson and Michael Witzel, &quot;Neurobiology,
Layered Texts, and Correlative Cosmologies: A Cross-Cultural Framework for
Premodern History&quot;, &lt;cite&gt;Bulletin of the Museum of Far Eastern
Antiquities&lt;/cite&gt; (Stockholm) &lt;strong&gt;72&lt;/strong&gt; (2000): 48--90 [PDF&lt;/a&gt;
available from &lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.safarmer.com/neuro-correlative.pdf&quot;&gt;Dr. Farmer&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~witzel/BMFEAfinal.pdf&quot;&gt;Prof. Witzel&lt;/a&gt;.
Normally, titles like that send me running, but having corresponded extensively
with Dr. Farmer, I think he's actually on to to something very real and
important.  (Though I remain skeptical about his detailed &lt;em&gt;neurological&lt;/em&gt;
conjectures, the
&lt;em&gt;cognitive&lt;/em&gt; mechanisms at play seem quite solid.)  I'll quote their
introduction/abstract, less footnotes.  &quot;This theoretical paper combines
neurobiological and textual evidence to develop a cross-cultural model of the
evolution of correlative systems.  The paper argues that claims that
correlative thought was in some way unique to China have seriously impeded
comparative studies; known by other names, correlative tendencies were no less
prominent (and were sometimes more extreme) in premodern India, the Middle
East, the West, and Mesoamerica than in China.  Below, we discuss some factors
that have led to varying degrees of interest in correlative thought in
differeent fields; arguments are given that parallel developments in
correlative cosmologies provide a potent cross-cultural framework for premodern
studies in general.  Our model pictures the growth of 'high-correlative'
systems --- multileveled reflecting cosmologies, nested hierarchies, abstract
systems of correspondences, and similar developments --- as byproducts of
exegetical processes operating in layered textual traditions over extended
periods; the origins of primitive correlative thought and related animistic
ideas seen at the earliest levels of those traditions, 'worked up' abstractly
in later strata, are tied in our model to neurobiological data.  The union of
neurobiological and textual evidence reviewed in our paper allows the
construction of evolutionary models of the growth of premodern religious and
philosophical systems, most of which acquired elaborate correlative features
over time; the model links fluctuations in these developments to shifts in
literate technologies and other factors affecting premodern textual flows.
Part of our paper describes novel methods for studying these developments in a
broad class of computer simulations; to our knowledge, ours is the first theory
of the evolution of religious and philosophical ideas capable of being
implemented and partially tested in such simulations.  The conclusion of our
paper discusses a number of historical tests of our model; special emphasis is
placed on challenges the model raises to popular claims that extensive
manuscript traditions existed in the latter Shang and Western Zhou
dynasties --- or, even earlier, in ancient India's oldest civilization, in the
Indus Valley.&quot;]
	&lt;li&gt;Jack Goody, &lt;cite&gt;The Domestication of the Savage Mind&lt;/cite&gt;
[Correlational systems as a consequence of writing, especially of tables.  &quot;The
matrix abhors a vacuum&quot;, as he says.]
	&lt;li&gt;Joseph Needham, &lt;cite&gt;Science and Civilisation in China,&lt;/cite&gt;
vol. II
	&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>