<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- name="generator" content="blosxom/2.0" -->
<!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN" "http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd">

<rss version="0.91">
  <channel>
    <title>Notebooks   </title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks</link>
    <description>Cosma's Notebooks</description>
    <language>en</language>

  <item>
    <title>Teaching Statistics</title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks/2009/07/19#teaching-statistics</link>
    <description>
&lt;P&gt;Doing this is now, officially, what I am paid for.  I am basically
unembarrassed about doing this while never having &lt;em&gt;taken&lt;/em&gt; a statistics
class --- after all, I do statistical research, so it's not &lt;em&gt;exactly&lt;/em&gt;
like a celibate man offering advice on marriage --- but I do want to do
it &lt;em&gt;better&lt;/em&gt;.

&lt;P&gt;One thing which particularly concerns me is that almost all the introductory
textbooks I run across seem like either cookbooks, or lower and distorted forms
of Cram&amp;eacute;r's &lt;cite&gt;Mathematical Methods of Statistics&lt;/cite&gt;.
Cram&amp;eacute;r's book is &lt;a href=&quot;../reviews/cramer-on-math-stat/&quot;&gt;great&lt;/a&gt;,
but giving a debased version of it to engineers or social scientists doesn't
seem all that effective.  So I'm interested in good approaches to teaching
statistics as a way of learning about the world from data, not a set of rituals
or a calculational exercise in basic probability theory.  If they do a good job
of teaching about computer-intensive methods and applied probability, so much
the better.

&lt;P&gt;In fact, what I'd really like is for somebody to write a popular book on
&quot;better living through data analysis&quot;.  I wish I could say that
&lt;cite&gt;Freakonomics&lt;/cite&gt; was that book, but
it &lt;a
href=&quot;http://d-squareddigest.blogspot.com/2005_11_27_d-squareddigest_archive.html#113336769665072876&quot;&gt;isn't&lt;/a&gt;.


&lt;ul&gt;Recommended:
	&lt;li&gt;Larry Gonick and Woollcott Smith, &lt;cite&gt;The Cartoon Guide to
Statistics&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;D. Huff, &lt;cite&gt;How to Lie with Statistics&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~larry/&quot;&gt;Larry Wasserman&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;cite&gt;All of Statistics&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;Recommended second or secondary books (i.e., ones with too few
technicalities to be self-contained, first-reading texts):
	&lt;li&gt;Robert P. Abelson, &lt;cite&gt;Statistics as Principled Argument&lt;/cite&gt;
[&quot;Author's note: There is a Robert P. Abelson who sings in the Yiddish theater
in New York.  Although theatrically inclined, I cannot (alas) claim to be that
person also.&quot;]
	&lt;li&gt;Richard A. Berk, &lt;cite&gt;Regression Analysis: A Constructive
Critique&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;../weblog/algae-2007-11.html&quot;&gt;My comments&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;Recommended, misc.:
	&lt;li&gt;Nathan Moore, Nicole Schoolmeesters, &quot;Computational Physics and
Reality: Looking for Some Overlap at the Blacksmith
Shop&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/0904.3960&quot;&gt;arxiv:0904.3960&lt;/a&gt; [This
sounds like it might also work for a course in stochastics...]
	&lt;/ul&gt;


&lt;ul&gt;To read:
	&lt;li&gt;Murray Aitkin, Brian Francis, John Hinde and Ross Darnell, &lt;cite&gt;Statistical Modelling in R&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/Mathematics/ProbabilityStatistics/?view=usa&amp;ci=9780199219131&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]

	&lt;li&gt;Benjamin M. Bolker, &lt;cite&gt;Ecological Models and Data
in R&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://press.princeton.edu/titles/8709.html&quot;&gt;blurb, intro&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;F. M. Dekking, C. Kraaikamp, H. P. Lopuha&amp;auml; and L. E. Meester,
&lt;cite&gt;A Modern Introduction to Probability and Statistics: Understanding How
and Why&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.springeronline.com/sgw/cda/frontpage/0,11855,5-0-22-34951942-0,00.html&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Finkelstein, Smith and Levin, &lt;cite&gt;Statistics for Lawyers&lt;/cite&gt;
[&quot;Despite its pedestrian title, it is not a routine statistics text with legal
examples tossed in.  The selection of topics and examples, as well as the
exposition of statistics and law, is erudite, informed, and even
entertaining.&quot; --- or so says the review quoted by Springer Verlag]
	&lt;li&gt;Andrew Gelman and and Deborah Nolan, &lt;cite&gt;Teaching Statistics:
A Bag of Tricks&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Phillip I. Good, &lt;cite&gt;Resampling Methods: A Practical Guide to
Data Analysis&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Phillip I. Good and James W. Hardin, &lt;cite&gt;Common Errors in
Statistics (and How to Avoid Them)&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Dana K. Keller, &lt;cite&gt;The Tao of Statistics: A Path to
Understanding (With No Math)&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Gary King, Robert O. Keohane and Sidney Verba, &lt;cite&gt;Designing
Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pupress.princeton.edu/titles/5458.html&quot;&gt;Blurb, preface,
ch. 1&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Ben Klemens, &lt;cite&gt;Modeling with Data&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://avocado.econ.jhu.edu/modeling/&quot;&gt;website with draft text&lt;/a&gt;.
Looks interesting and I like the idea of integrating it with computing, and
with databases.  (But I've forogtten almost everything I knew about
databases.)]
	&lt;li&gt;Neil J. Salking, &lt;cite&gt;Statistics for People Who (Think They)
Hate Statistics&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Aris Spanos, &lt;citE&gt;Probability Theory and Statistical Inference&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Jefferson Hane Weaver, &lt;cite&gt;Conquering Statistics: Numbers Without the Crunch&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>