<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- name="generator" content="blosxom/2.0" -->
<!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN" "http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd">

<rss version="0.91">
  <channel>
    <title>Notebooks   </title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks</link>
    <description>Cosma's Notebooks</description>
    <language>en</language>

  <item>
    <title>Thought and Society</title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks/2009/12/25#thought-and-society</link>
    <description>

&lt;P&gt;Not thinking about society, but how society and culture shape thought.
Especially &lt;a href=&quot;collective-cognition.html&quot;&gt;collective cognition&lt;/a&gt;:
accomplishing cognitive taskes &lt;em&gt;en masse.&lt;/em&gt; (&quot;Thought&quot; is broader than
&quot;cognition,&quot; which has connotations of knowledge; but thought can be
arbitrarily mangled and wrong and senseless, and frequently is.)

&lt;P&gt;&lt;em&gt;Fundamental attribution error vs. cultural change.&lt;/em&gt;  Social
psychologists speak of the &quot;fundamental attribution error&quot;, which people's
tendency, when explaining human behavior, to give too much weight to relatively
permanent personal characteristics (honesty, courage, lasciviousness,
rationality), and not enough to the particular situation of the actors.  Query:
how much apparent change in culture, &quot;mentalities&quot;, etc., is really due to
changes in the type and distribution of the situations people find themselves
in?  Consider e.g. the common claim that &lt;a href=&quot;modernity.html&quot;&gt;modernity&lt;/a&gt;
(or industrial society, capitalism, etc.) makes people see themselves as
self-regarding individuals, whereas those in traditional agrarian societies saw
themselves as members of a community.  Even granting that there is a genuine
behavioral difference, might this not be because, under modern conditions,
people have more &lt;em&gt;occasion&lt;/em&gt; to act individualistically?  --- Might this
provide a non-mysterious mechanism for social structure to (appear to)
influence culture?

&lt;P&gt;See also:
	&lt;a href=&quot;analogy.html&quot;&gt;Analogy and Metaphor&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;cognitive-science.html&quot;&gt;Cognitive Science&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;historical-materialism.html&quot;&gt;Historical Materialism&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;memes.html&quot;&gt;Memes&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;psychoceramics.html&quot;&gt;Psychoceramics&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;scientific-thinking.html&quot;&gt;Scientific Thinking&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;social-construction-of-reality.html&quot;&gt;Social Construction of Reality&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;sociology.html&quot;&gt;Sociology&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;sociology-of-science.html&quot;&gt;Sociology of science&lt;/a&gt;;
	&lt;a href=&quot;universal-images.html&quot;&gt;Universal Signs, Images and Symbols&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;See:
	&lt;li&gt;J. M. Balkin, &lt;cite&gt;Cultural Software: A Theory of Ideology&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/jbalkin/cs/&quot;&gt;Full text free online&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Albert J. Bergesen, &quot;Durkheim's Theory of Mental Categories: A
Review of the Evidence&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110549&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Annual
Review of Sociology&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;30&lt;/strong&gt; (395--408)&lt;/a&gt; [Discussed &lt;a
href=&quot;http://bactra.org/weblog/279.html&quot;&gt;elsewhere&lt;/a&gt;.  For Durkheim's works,
see &lt;a href=&quot;religion.html&quot;&gt;Religion&lt;/a&gt;.]
	&lt;li&gt;Raymond Boudon
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;The Analysis of Ideology&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;citE&gt;The Art of Self-Persuasion&lt;/citE&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Theories of Social Change: A Critical
Appraisal&lt;/cite&gt; [Contains an insightful critique of the &quot;sociology of
knowledge&quot; tradition, or at least that part of it which tries to show how
people's beliefs are effects of their place in the social structure.]
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Donald Brown, &lt;cite&gt;Hierarchy, History, and Human Nature: The
Social Origins of Historical Consciousness&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Rochel Gelman and R. C. Gallistel, &quot;Language and the Origin of
Numerical Concepts&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1105144&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Science&lt;/cite&gt; &lt;strong&gt;306&lt;/strong&gt;
(2004): 441--443&lt;/a&gt; [And the related articles it refers to in the same issue.]
	&lt;li&gt;Jack Goody, &lt;cite&gt;The Domestication of the Savage Mind&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Edwin Hutchins, &lt;cite&gt;Cognition in the Wild&lt;/cite&gt; [and, if I may
say so, my &lt;a href=&quot;../reviews/cognition-in-the-wild/&quot;&gt;review thereof&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;A. R. Luria, &lt;cite&gt;Cognitive Development: Its Cultural and Social Foundations&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.marxists.org/archive/luria/works/1976/problem.htm&quot;&gt;ch. 1&lt;/a&gt; is online; &lt;a href=&quot;http://bactra.org/weblog/484.html&quot;&gt;my comments&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Stephen Turner
		    &lt;ul&gt;
		    &lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;The Social Theory of Practices: Tradition, Tacit
Knowledge, and Presuppositions&lt;/cite&gt;
		    &lt;li&gt;&lt;citE&gt;Brains/Practices/Relativism: Social Theory after
Cognitive Science&lt;/cite&gt;
		    &lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;vygotsky.html&quot;&gt;Lev Vygotsky&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;cite&gt;Thought and
Language&lt;/cite&gt; [Vygotsky gets his own page]
	&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;To read:
	&lt;li&gt;Margaret S. Archer, &lt;cite&gt;Structure, Agency and the Internal
Conversation&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/0521535972&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Paul B. Bates and Ursula M. Staudinger (eds.), &lt;cite&gt;Interactive
Minds: Life-Span Perspectives on the Social Foundation of Cognition&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Leslie Brothers, &lt;cite&gt;Friday's Footprint: How Society Shapes the
Human Mind&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Michael Carrithers, &lt;cite&gt;Why Humans Have Cultures: Explaining
Anthropology and Social Diversity&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Karen Cerulo
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;citE&gt;Never Saw It Coming: Cultural Challenges to
Envisioning the Worst&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.press.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/hfs.cgi/00/190763.ctl&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
		&lt;li&gt; (ed.), &lt;cite&gt;Culture in Mind: Toward a Sociology of
Culture and Cognition&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Aaron V. Cicourel, &lt;Cite&gt;Cognitive Sociology: Language and
Meaning in Social Interaction&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Michael Cole, &lt;cite&gt;Cultural Psychology&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Randall Collins, &lt;cite&gt;The Sociology of Philosophies: A Global
Theory of Intellectual Change&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.hup.harvard.edu/S98Books/S98Catalog/sociology_philos.html&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Keith Dixon, &lt;cite&gt;The Sociology of Belief: Fallacy and
Foundation&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Jon Elster, &lt;cite&gt;Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of
Rationality&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Heidi Keller et al. (eds.), &lt;cite&gt;Between Culture and Biology:
Perspectives on Ontogenetic Development&lt;/cite&gt; [&quot;Cambridge Studies in Cognitive
and Perceptual Development&quot;]
	&lt;li&gt;Zolt&amp;aacute;n K&amp;ouml;vecses, &lt;cite&gt;Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/9780521696128&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Arthur Lupia, Matthew D. McCubbins and Samuel L. Popkin,
&lt;cite&gt;Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of
Rationality&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;George Herbert Mead
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Mind, Self and Society: From the Standpoint of a
Social Behaviorist&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;(ed. Anselm Strauss), &lt;cite&gt;The Social Psychology of
George Herbert Mead&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Katherine Nelson, &lt;cite&gt;Language in Cognitive Development: The
Emergence of the Mediated Mind&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Ute Sch&amp;ouml;pflug (ed.), &lt;citE&gt;Cultural transmission : psychological, developmental, social, and methodological aspects&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/9780521880435&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Bradd Shore, &lt;cite&gt;Culture in Mind: Cognition, Culture and the
Problem of Meaning&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;James P. Spradley (ed.), &lt;cite&gt;Culture and Cognition: Rules, Maps,
and Plans&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Claudia Strauss and Naomi Quinn, &lt;cite&gt;A Cognitive Theory of
Cultural Meanings&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Michael Tomasello, &lt;cite&gt;The Cultural Origins of Human
Cognition&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog/TOMCUL.html&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Jaan Valsiner and Rene van der Veer, &lt;cite&gt;The Social Mind:
Construction of the Idea&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/0521589738&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Kathleen D. Vohs, Nicole L. Mead, and Miranda R. Goode, &quot;The
Psychological Consequences of Money&quot;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1132491&quot;&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Science&lt;/cite&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;314&lt;/strong&gt; (2006): 1154--1156&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Eviatar Zerubavel, &lt;cite&gt;Social Mindscapes: An Invitation to
Cognitive Sociology&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog/ZERSOC.html&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>