<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- name="generator" content="blosxom/2.0" -->
<!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN" "http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd">

<rss version="0.91">
  <channel>
    <title>Notebooks   </title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks</link>
    <description>Cosma's Notebooks</description>
    <language>en</language>

  <item>
    <title>Lev Semyonovich Vygotsky</title>
    <link>http://bactra.org/notebooks/2004/03/28#vygotsky</link>
    <description>

&lt;P&gt;Soviet psychologist and prominent &quot;&lt;a
href=&quot;pre-cognitivism.html&quot;&gt;pre-cognitivist&lt;/a&gt;&quot;.  His work focused on the
development of cognitive skills, especially skills of self-control, and how
these were supported (&quot;mediated&quot;) by external tools, above all the
culturally-provided tools of language and social interaction.  He was
particularly interested in the ways people &quot;internalize&quot; such tools, learning
to do without such scaffolding, though it's necessary for the acquisition of
the skill.  (He went so far as to speculate that all cognitive abilities
originated as internalizations of social interactions.  Whether he meant this
ontogenetically or phylogenetically, or in some sense both, I can't tell, and
in any case it seems very unconvincing to me.)  One way of thinking about what
he was doing (grossly anarchonistic but useful) is that he was interested in
how orgnaisms with limited computational ability can &lt;em&gt;effectively&lt;/em&gt;
expand their information-processing powers by interacting with structured
environments --- think of how, in &lt;a href=&quot;computation.html&quot;&gt;formal language
theory&lt;/a&gt;, attaching a stack to a finite-state machine lets it generate
context-free languages, not just regular languages.  Another anachronistic
framing is that he was interested in &lt;a
href=&quot;collective-cognition.html&quot;&gt;collective cognition&lt;/a&gt;.  Some modern
Vygotskyans believe their socio-cultural approach is an &lt;em&gt;alternative&lt;/em&gt; to
the more usual, computational approach to &lt;a
href=&quot;cognitive-science.html&quot;&gt;cognition&lt;/a&gt;.  This has never made any sense to
me, more or less for the reasons Frawley lays out in his book.

&lt;P&gt;This was inteded as a self-consciously Marxist, but nonetheless objective
and scientific, psychological theory, emphasizing the role of history and
&lt;a href=&quot;thought-and-society.html&quot;&gt;social relations&lt;/a&gt;, as well as the
functional, &lt;a href=&quot;adaptation.html&quot;&gt;adaptive&lt;/a&gt; character of thought.
Comparisons to American &lt;a href=&quot;pragmatism.html&quot;&gt;pragmatism&lt;/a&gt; and to &lt;a
href=&quot;piaget.html&quot;&gt;Piaget&lt;/a&gt; are common-place.  Comparisons to &lt;a
href=&quot;positivism.html&quot;&gt;positivism&lt;/a&gt;, in the mode of Ernst Mach or the &lt;a
href=&quot;logical-positivism.html&quot;&gt;Logical Positivists&lt;/a&gt; less common but equally
apt.  (I imagine that Vygotsky and &lt;a href=&quot;neurath.html&quot;&gt;Otto Neurath&lt;/a&gt;
would've had a lot to say to each other, if Vygotsky could've gotten over
Neurath's rather unorthodox approach to Marxism.)  I should probably say
something here about the Soviet academico-political decisions which led
Vygotskyism to be officially suppressed in favor of Pavlovian
reflex-psychology, forcing his best students into neuroscience, but I don't
feel up to it today.


&lt;ul&gt;Recommended:
	&lt;li&gt;William Frawley, &lt;cite&gt;Vygotsky and Cognitive Science: Language and
the Unification of the Social and Computational Mind&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;A. R. Luria [Most prominent of Vygotsky's disciples, best known
for his work on &lt;a href=&quot;neuropsychology.html&quot;&gt;neuropsychology&lt;/a&gt;.]
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;citE&gt;The Making of Mind: A Personal Account of Soviet
Psychology&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Cognitive Development: Its Social and Cultural
Foundations&lt;/cite&gt; [With reservations, e.g., in some places it seems pretty
obvious to me that their native subjects were being &lt;em&gt;deliberately&lt;/em&gt;
obtuse, or countering questions about deductions with insultingly stupid
premises with deductions of the same form but incompatible premises, and that
Luria &amp; co. just didn't get it.]
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Lev Vygotsky, &lt;cite&gt;Thought and Language&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;/ul&gt;


&lt;ul&gt;To read:
	&lt;li&gt;Laura E. Berk, &lt;cite&gt;Awakening Children's Minds: How Parents and
Teachers Can Make a Difference&lt;/cite&gt; [Vygotskian psychology for parents; why
hasn't anyone written this before?]
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Cambridge Companion to Vygotsky&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Harry Daniels (ed.), &lt;cite&gt;An Introduction to Vygotsky&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Yuriy A. Karpov, &lt;cite&gt;The Neo-Vygotskian Approach to Child
Development&lt;/cite&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/0521830125&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Alex Kozulin, &lt;cite&gt;Vygotsky's Psychology: A Biography of
Ideas&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Alex Kozulin, Boris Gindis, Vladimir S. Ageyev and Suzanne M. Miller,
&lt;cite&gt;Vygotsky's Educational Theory in Cultural Context&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/9780521528832&quot;&gt;Blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Susan Pass, &lt;cite&gt;Parallel Paths to Constructivism: Jean Piaget and Lev Vygotsky&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Anastasia Tryphon et al., &lt;cite&gt;Piaget-Vygotsky: The Social Genesis
of Thought&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Jaan Valsiner and Rene van der Veer, &lt;cite&gt;The Social Mind:
Construction of the Idea&lt;/cite&gt;
[&lt;a href=&quot;http://cambridge.org/0521589738&quot;&gt;blurb&lt;/a&gt;]
	&lt;li&gt;Lev Vygotsky, &lt;citE&gt;Mind in Society&lt;/cite&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;James V. Wertsch
		&lt;ul&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Mind as Action&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Vygotsky and the Social Formation of Mind&lt;/cite&gt;
		&lt;/ul&gt;
	&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>